Under the watchful eye: LCWR investigated
Just weeks after the visitation of American women religious congregations was announced, the Leadership Conference of Women's Religious (LCWR) learned that it would be the subject of a doctrinal assessment by the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF).
The 44-year-old LCWR has 1,500 members who represent about 95 percent of U.S. women religious. It is a resource to the leaders of congregations and it also provides a collective voice on issues of justice.
The CDF met with LCWR's leaders nine years ago to inquire how they were receiving and promoting church teaching in three areas: ordination of women, interfaith relations, and homosexuality. According to the National Catholic Reporter, the CDF prefect, Cardinal William Levada, informed LCWR leaders of the need for the current assessment in a 2009 letter: "Given both the tenor and the doctrinal content of various addresses given at the annual assemblies of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious in the intervening years, this dicastery can only conclude that the problems which had motivated its request in 2001 continue to be present."
Fifty-four percent of respondents to our survey consider the doctrinal assessment of LCWR to be "insulting and unjustified," and 25 percent see it as unnecessary.
Even many of the 8 percent of respondents who believe it is "reasonable and justified" have concerns. One such sister-who writes from Ohio that she has "little use for the ideological blindness of LCWR"-says that the assessment "is being conducted in an insulting and dangerous manner that will not help matters. It ignores a lot of the good LCWR does, for example, mentoring new leadership in the hard decisions they need to make about giving up sponsorship, selling motherhouses, and reconfiguring provinces."
While most respondents focused on LCWR's role in cultivating leadership, others did not shy away from the charge of controversial perspectives: "Members of LCWR are chosen because we saw in them the ability, wisdom, and Spirit to lead our congregations," writes Franciscan Sister Mariette Kalbac of Wheaton, Illinois. "We admire them for their courage in speaking their truth and taking stands that are sometimes prophetic and different from the institutional church."
Regardless of where they stand on controversial issues, many respondents agree with Ursuline Sister Regina Rogers of Youngstown, Ohio: "As a former general superior, I appreciated their ability to envision a future for religious life. I also believe that they have gone out of their way to be open with the hierarchy. This openness has not been reciprocated."
Heather Grennan Gary is a contributing editor at U.S. Catholic. This article appeared in the January 2010 issue of U.S. Catholic (Vol. 75. No. 1, p. 15).
Comments (3)
here we have the crux-----
By Anonymous (not verified) on Sunday, June 27, 2010Jerry I agree with you if you are dealing with spiritual theology of the "universal" church but as a social organization there are no such constraints surely no one would ever imagine Jesus requiring his followers to accept sex abusers,criminal facilitators,predatory priests and their protectors.Abortion is murder and definitely against Jesus' teaching.PEACE
Here we have the crux of the problem...
By JerryInOwasso (not verified) on Saturday, June 19, 2010"Members of LCWR are chosen because we saw in them the ability, wisdom, and Spirit to lead our congregations," writes Franciscan Sister Mariette Kalbac of Wheaton, Illinois. "We admire them for their courage in speaking their truth and taking stands that are sometimes prophetic and different from the institutional church."
======================
The problem is the direction in which they are leading the congregations.
Recall the following from the Gospels: "thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." (Matt. 16:18) and "He that is not with me, is against me: and he that gathereth not with me, scattereth." (Matt. 12:30)
Thus, if the LCWR is taking stands that oppose the "institutional Church" (Peter) they are against Christ. It seems they have two choices: get back in line with the Church, and hence Christ; or formally split from the Church. Recall that "Catholic" means universal: the Church can't be universal if there are factions going off in different directions. When this happens, Christ has already declared who wins the battle.
Gather or scatter? Take your pick...
Problems in religious communities
By Giuseppe Paolo (not verified) on Thursday, December 31, 2009The problems that religious communities like those that support the current "mission" of the LWCR is that they have lost their compass with regard to their role in the Church and their fidelity to the will of God. Their supporters speak of "speaking truth that is different from the institutional church" as defense of what they are promoting. Christ said that "he who hears you, hears me" when speaking of the Church. There is only one God, one Christ (the Truth, the Life and the Way) and one Church that Christ founded and promised to keep her faithful and free from error so that "Hell would not prevail against her". If we accept this as settled truth then how can and organization like LWCR and its contemporaries speak a different truth and it still be the truth? Religious communities and catholic organizations that promote values, lifestyles and moral choices are not in line with the teaching office of the Church are a scandal to the faith. They have exchanged their fidelity and vows for the embrace of the pride and vanity of this world. Traditional, conservative (in faith, teaching, fidelity and dress) religious communities have continued to survive and even thrive in the US and throughout the world while the supposedly "enlightened" religious communities struggle financially and with their faith (literally and figuratively). All religious are in my daily prayers that they would be Holy and Faithful to God and to His Church. These are not mutually exclusive precepts.

