Hawaii OKs civil unions; Maryland House panel debates same-sex marriage
HONOLULU (CNS) -- Hawaii Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie signed same-sex civil unions into law Feb. 23, a week after the bill passed the state Legislature, calling it a "triumph for everyone."
Civil unions will be legal in the 50th state beginning Jan. 1, 2012. The law extends the same rights, benefits, protections and responsibilities of spouses in marriage to homosexual couples in a civil union.
The Hawaii Catholic Conference said it was disappointed with lawmakers' support for the measure and the governor's endorsement.
"Passage of this legislation is just a step toward the legalization of same-sex marriage," said the conference, the church's public policy arm, in a Feb. 23 statement.
"Marriage is what it is and always has been, no matter how this Legislature defines it; however, the public understanding of marriage will be negatively affected by passage of a law that ignores the natural fact that sexual complementarity is at the very core of marriage," it said. "The impact of this legislation on Catholic ministries remains an important and thus far unanswered concern."
Meanwhile in Maryland, a committee of the House of Delegates opened a hearing about same-sex marriage Feb. 25; a vote by the full House was expected to follow quickly. The state Senate passed the measure Feb. 24, and Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley has promised to sign it into law.
In a homily Feb. 13 at an archdiocesan Mass for World Marriage Day, Baltimore Archbishop Edwin F. O'Brien said the recognition of marriage as being between one man and one woman is not arbitrary.
"This recognition, bestowed on marriage by societies throughout human history, originates in a simple biological fact," he said. "The union of one man and one woman is the only relationship capable of creating children and nurturing them together as father and mother."
In late January in Hawaii, Honolulu Bishop Larry Silva wrote to state senators urging them to vote against legalizing civil union, saying passage of the measure would have "detrimental effects."
The bishop described the legislation as discriminating against non-Western cultures, children and family members.
"Civil unions, while they may not be the exact equivalent of marriage, are so much like marriage that our acceptance of them will ultimately force us into accepting same-sex marriage," he wrote. "We should not be afraid to identify the desire of same-sex couples to enshrine these unions in law as a manufactured civil right and not a true civil right based upon our human dignity."
Abercrombie's signing the bill into law coincided with President Barack Obama's Feb. 23 order for his administration to stop defending a federal law banning same-sex marriages.
The Hawaii law follows years of court fights, protest rallies and debate on the subject.
Last summer, then-Gov. Linda Lingle vetoed a bill that would have established civil unions in Hawaii, saying she believed the legislation was "essentially (same-sex) marriage by another name." The Catholic conference and the Hawaii Family Forum praised her decision, saying it affirmed "the will of Hawaii citizens."
Copyright © 2011 Catholic News Service/U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
Same Sex Unions
By John Zubalik (not verified) on Wednesday, March 2, 2011Since Maryland (Mary's Land) is such a Blue State,the outcome of this issue is a foredrawn conclusion. I Pray daily for my home state, and my country for the Evil One has a stranglehold on both. I pray that Our Father will hold back His hand,for the judgement of men is forthcoming.Who will be able to say "Lord, I kept Your Word Holy, and obeyed"? Lord have Mercy on us. Jesus, I Trust In Thee. Amen.
Civil unions
By Anonymous (not verified) on Tuesday, March 1, 2011It does seem to me that recognizing civil unions as having the same legal rights as married unions is a sensible way to accommodate the natural desire of committed homosexual couples be recognized as CIVILLY legitimate though NOT sacramental (i.e. married). They should not be stigmatized by the self-righteous nor should their relationship not receive legal benefits accorded to the sacramentally married. We live in a pluralistic, democratic society that should respect the dignity of all types of individuals who live justly.
THE VOTE IN MARYLAND
By Richard Cook (not verified) on Tuesday, March 1, 2011My bishop here in Baltimore, Archbishop Edwin F. O'Brien is quoted as saying, marriage as being between one man and one woman is a "recognition, bestowed on marriage by societies throughout human history, [which] originates in a simple biological fact." . . . "The union of one man and one woman is the only relationship capable of creating children and nurturing them together as father and mother."
Historically, marriage has been defined very differently by various civil societies, including a recognition of polygamy (ancient tribes, including Hebrew patriarchs), marriage for the preservation of property, including the denial of inheritance by wives (early and medieval Europe) and an outright denial of marriage between one man and one woman - if the male partner was a slave (colonial Maryland).
The Church has cooperated in all of these motivations for marriage or for forbidding marriage, as in the case of prohibitions of slaves marrying free people.
The "one man, one woman" definition is of recent origin, and has not always been a sacrament of the Church. The Church certainly can enforce its own definition of marriage upon communicants, ought not attempt to imposed doctrinal strictures on civil society, which is composed of many persons, who are not communicants of the Catholic or indeed, of any church.
I hope the Church reconsiders its campaign against same-sex marriage, as this prohibition, in civil society, is discriminatory and cruel to people who want to end their solitary existence and become bound to another. This request is reasonable and expressive of human promptings, which the Church ought not denounce.
In view of the growing number of children raised by same-sex couples, the Church should not act to stigmatize these kids.
Don't just hope... pray
By Stacie Adams (not verified) on Tuesday, March 1, 2011I too hope and pray that the Church will reconsider its campaign against same-sex couples. While I believe that the Church recognizing same-sex marriages in the Catholic Church is a decade or so away, it is sinful for us to campaign for discrimination against a disenfranchised group. A person's legal (state) rights should not be linked to their place in the church.
Putting in the most simplest terms this is an issue of Separation of Church and State.
The Victory is Not for Everyone, God is Soon to Come!
By Pastor Calvin Baker (not verified) on Tuesday, March 1, 20112 Timothy 3 teaches us, This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3. Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, 4. Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; 5. Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. This (The signing of the civil union bill) is not a victory for those who desire to break God's Law, but a victory for those who live right before Him, because in due season we shall reap if we faint not. God is soon to come and has warned us of these things which are to come. The saint are trying to save those who will hear from destruction through thier own lust according to the Word of God, but for some you will not hear. Selah!
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. Links are not allowed and comments with them will be moderated or deleted. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.

