Logo

Vatican official urges confidentiality by confessors on sex abuse sins

Thursday, March 18, 2010
By John Thavis, Catholic News Service
ShareThis

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- A priest who confesses sexual abuse in the sacrament of penance should be absolved and should generally not be encouraged by the confessor to disclose his acts publicly or to his superiors, a Vatican official said.

Likewise, the confessor should not make the contents of such a confession public, said Bishop Gianfranco Girotti, regent of the Apostolic Penitentiary, a Vatican court that handles issues related to the sacrament of penance.

Bishop Girotti spoke in an interview published March 17 in L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican newspaper. His comments came as church leaders were responding to the disclosure of hundreds of allegations of past sexual abuse by priests in several European countries.

Bishop Girotti spoke strictly about the response of a confessor, and not about the wider responsibility to acknowledge and investigate priestly sexual abuse outside the confessional.

When a priest confesses such acts, "the confession can only have absolution as a consequence," he said.

"It is not up to the confessor to make them public or to ask the penitent to incriminate himself in front of superiors. This is true because, on one hand, the sacramental seal remains inviolable and, on the other hand, one cannot provoke mistrust in the penitent," he said.

"From the confessor, (the penitent) can only expect absolution, certainly not a sentence nor the order to confess his crime in public," he said.

Other Vatican officials, who spoke on background, said a distinction should be drawn between what a confessor requires of a penitent as a condition for absolution, and what the confessor may strongly encourage the penitent to do.

In the case of priestly sexual abuse, for example, a confessor may want to recommend that a priest discuss the situation with superiors in order to avoid the occasion of future sins, they said. Publicly admitting the sin might even be required of a penitent if it would clear the name of another person unjustly accused of the same act, they said.

In the interview, Bishop Girotti also explained why the church reserves to bishops the overall authority for absolution for the sin of abortion, but not for other grave sins like murder or the sexual abuse of minors by priests. Essentially, he said, the purpose is to highlight the gravity of the sin of abortion.

"It's not really correct to say that it's easier to confess a murder or sexual abuse than an abortion. It's simply a matter of two different configurations of sin," he said.

"By placing abortion in the category of sins reserved to a higher competence, the aim was to place the accent on the seriousness of the killing of an individual even before he or she is born. The hope is also to encourage more reflection by those thinking of abortion as a way to resolve a serious personal issue," he said.

Copyright © 2010 Catholic News Service/U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

One scandal after another we

One scandal after another we should pray to God to save us.

This penalty is reserved to

This penalty is reserved to the Holy See. A confessor can encourage a man to turn himself in or seek counseling, but cannot force him to do so.

cannot break the seal

A priest who violates the seal of the confessional is excommunicated latae sententia immediately. This penalty is reserved to the Holy See. A confessor can encourage a man to turn himself in or seek counseling, but cannot force him to do so. Absolution must be given if the penitent is sorry for his sins and makes a promise of amendment of life.

To violate the seal would be to destroy the sacrament. One cannot use an evil means to attain a good end. No priest will do it.

To violate the seal would be

To violate the seal would be to destroy the sacrament. One cannot use an evil means to attain a good end. No priest will do it. gratta e vinci skill games giochi online scommesse online gratis

The Vaican must end this

Absolution of some sins

Let me get this straight___
A woman makes the difficult decision to have an abortion. The little soul goes home to God and lives in peace.
A priest fondles and abuses a child. The child grows up with horrible memories all his/her life.
Which sin requires a more serious absolution?

Both are very grave sins that cause tremendous damage

Let's be careful not to make abortion sound like it's a good thing- i.e. "the little soul goes home to God."    Abortion is murder  (although we certainly need to have compassion for, and not judge, the mothers who have done it.)

Both sins you named- abortion, and the abuse of a child-  are very grave offenses.

But let's not forget that God would forgive either sin, or any sin, in the blink of an eye.  Let's not lose sight of God's mercy, which takes precedence over everything else.

The reason the Church long ago attached the "automatic excommunication" to the sin of abortion was to underscore its seriousness, that it is indeed equivalent to murder.  In my opinion, if the Church were to eliminate this penalty of excommunication, it might give off a signal to everyone to view abortion as "less" serious as it used to be perceived.  This would be very dangerous.

At the end of the day, the "automatic excommunication" really does not mean that much of a difference for the sinner.  (It is not like where a formal "decree of excommunication" is written up, as with some rare sins.)    *Any* unabsolved *mortal sin* carries the eternal damnation of Hell if one dies (much more serious than any excommunication penalty), as well as not having access to Holy Communion while one is alive (basically equivalent to excommunication).

Bishops have a "higher competence" to absolve sins?

I had to echo the previous phrase: "You have GOT to be kidding!" when reading this article, especially when I came to learn that bishops have a "higher competence" to absolve the sin of abortion. Priests are less competent in absolution than bishops? Who comes up with these rules?
That just adds to the absurdity of this situation within the Catholic church. How can anyone read Jesus' comments about the Pharisees in Matthew 15:9 "They worship me in vain; their teachings are but rules taught by men" and not see disturbing parallels in what the Vatican officials are teaching?
Can't we drop the rules and regulations and just love one another?

Bishops DO have a higher competence to absolve sins!!!!

The only way that priests get any authority to absolve sins in the first place is from their bishops.

Christ Himself gave to His Apostles the authority to loose and bind, the power to forgive sins, the ministry of reconciliation....and the bishops are successors to those Apostles.

It is true that rituals, rules, and regulations can be followed wrongly- i.e. without the correct intentions of the heart.   (Christ condemned that.)  But on the other hand, Christ gave us a visible Church with visible leaders and doctrines.  

I have personally never heard of a woman having to make a personal appointment to meet with her bishop to receive absolution for the sin of abortion.  Wouldn't most bishops normally be as lenient as possible (i.e. extending the power of absolution to the parish priests) regarding this sin of abortion?  

Confession

"The only way that priests get any authority to absolve sins in the first place is from their bishops."

And the only way a bishop gets to be a bishop is from the pope. How then does the Vatican legal defense that priests and bishops are not employees of the Vatican hold water?

The Church sacrament of Confession creates a Catch 22 which essentially enforces the concealment of crime. That's a place few lawyers will go but it has happened and will probably happen more as lawsuits claiming a conspiracy by the Church go forward.

This all reminds me of a MAD magazine cartoon I saw recently while my daughter was checking out books in the library. The August issue shows a priest confessing to another priest in a traditional confessional that he has molested children in the most vile ways for years. The confessor tells the penitent that his sin is understandable, gives him a few Hail Mary's and absolves him. Then they switch places and roles with knowing glances and the same thing happens in reverse.

Some will say that's anti-Catholic but it's funny because it has the ring of truth. This statement makes it more so.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.