Logo

Bishop of Tulsa "turns his back on the people" during Mass

Friday, August 28, 2009
By Catholic News Service
ShareThis TULSA, Okla. (CNS) -- When he celebrates Mass at Tulsa's Holy Family Cathedral, Bishop Edward J. Slattery of Tulsa now faces the crucifix on the altar with his back to the congregation.

He has restored the liturgical practice, called "ad orientem," because he said it reflects "a more authentic Catholic worship."

The bishop, writing in the September issue of Tulsa's monthly diocesan magazine, Eastern Oklahoma Catholic, said the liturgical practice, largely abandoned in the 1960s, demonstrates how the priest and the congregation share in the act of worship.

"In the past 40 years," he wrote, "this shared orientation was lost; now the priest and the people have become accustomed to facing in opposite directions. The priest faces the people while the people face the priest, even though the eucharistic prayer is directed to the Father and not to the people."

The bishop began using this restored liturgical practice during Masses last December.

An article in the January issue of the diocesan magazine explained the change and noted that cathedral parishioners might have "been confused, thinking that the bishop had turned his back on them."

But many cathedral parishioners welcomed the restoration and said it gave them an increased understanding of the meaning of the liturgy, according to the article.

The bishop, who celebrates the Mass in English, said the "ad orientem" practice better represents what the Mass is all about, showing that the people and the priest are united in a single action. They offer one sacrifice, he explained, but in their proper roles: The people joined to Christ as his body and the priest configured to Christ as the head of the body.

"At Mass Christ joins us to himself as he offers himself in sacrifice to the Father for the world's redemption. We can offer ourselves like this in him because we have become members of his body by baptism," Bishop Slattery explained in his column.

"We also want to remember that all of the faithful offer the eucharistic sacrifice as members of Christ's body. It's incorrect to think that only the priest offers Mass," he continued. "All the faithful share in the offering, even though the priest has a unique role."

"Ad orientem" simply means "toward the east," he said, noting that the church's ancient liturgical practices had the priest and people facing in the same direction, usually toward the east, "in the expectation that when Christ returns, he will return 'from the east.'"

There were "solid reasons for the church to have held on to this posture for so long," he said.

"First of all, the Catholic liturgy has always maintained a marvelous adherence to the apostolic tradition," Bishop Slattery said. "We see the Mass, indeed the whole liturgical expression of the church's life, as something which we have received from the apostles and which we in turn are expected to hand on intact.

"Secondly, the church held on to this single eastward position because of the sublime way it reveals the nature of the Mass ... that the priest stands at the head of the people, sharing in one and the same action ... an act of worship," he said.

Since the Second Vatican Council, the priest has faced the people, partly to help them "understand the liturgical action of the Mass by allowing them to see what was going on, and partly as an accommodation to contemporary culture where people who exercise authority are expected to face directly the people they serve, like a teacher sitting behind her desk."

But the change had "a number of unforeseen and largely negative effects," the bishop said.

"It was a serious rupture with the church's ancient tradition. ... It can give the appearance that the priest and the people were engaged in a conversation about God, rather than the worship of God," he said. And it also "places an inordinate importance on the personality of the celebrant by placing him on a kind of liturgical stage," he said.

Even before he became pope, Pope Benedict XVI "has been urging us to draw upon the ancient liturgical practice of the church to recover a more authentic Catholic worship and, for that reason, I have restored the venerable 'ad orientem position.'"

Copyright © 2009 Catholic News Service/U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

GREAT!

I am too young to remember the tridentine mass. I occasionally attend Latin Mass and regularly attend the ordinary mass. I have said for some time that I would like a mass said in English but with "ad orientum" posture. To me, it makes much more sense for the priest to face the crucifixion and join the people in the celebration.

Masculine Priest

I'm young enough that I never remember attending an "ad orientem" mass. I've heard some say priests were neutered when they faced the people in more of a last supper table setting rather than leading the people in worship of the Almighty.

I wonder what effect changing the orientation of the priest has had on vocations.

I am from Tulsa and welcome the tradition

I am from Tulsa and although I have not attended mass at the Cathedral, I am please to see the tradition return. I would also like to see the communion rail return. It seems as though we have gotten away from reverence of the Eucharist and traditional practices which in some instances has caused a rather "informal" approach to the Mass. I can't wait to attend Mass with Bishop Slattery.

I couldnt agree with you

I couldnt agree with you more, I grew up with the priest worshiping in the same direction as the congregation ..just as my parents and grandparents and on and on and all of the sudden its a "correction" well the mass is beautiful no matter what. and I too miss the communion rail. color me in the non-progressive movement.

He, and the congregation,

He, and the congregation, face the Lord. What's so difficult to understand?

BISHOP BACK

WHAT!!!!! I can't believe it. What happened to this Bishop?

Bishop Back

Unfortunately he's the latest in a growing number of conservative catholics who want to turn the clock back to a time before Vatican II. Just like in ancient Roman pagan tradition, where the priest and congregants alike faced the statue representing the deity, this practice found it's way into the celebration of Mass. John XXIII rightfully corrected this practice (did Jesus and the Apostles face in one direction at the Last Supper?). But like most conservatives, the old ways are the best ways regardless of how alienating or anachronistic they may be for the laypeople.

Where do you get your facts?

This has NOTHING to do with "turning the clock back". Vatican II did not change the orientation of the priest at Mass. The modern Sacramentary and GIRM allow for (and in fact anticipate) that the priest will be standing on the same side of the altar as the people, because there are instructions for him to "face the people" and then to "face the altar".

The practice came to us, not from Roman paganism, but from the Jewish worship, which was to face Jerusalem. Instead, Christians would face the East, which was a sign of Jesus as the Sun of Righteousness and of his eventual return.

Ad orientem worship is a universal practice; that is, it is found in both the Western and Eastern Churches. For that, it has great ecumenical value for our long-desired reunion with our Eastern Orthodox brethren.

When and where did Blessed Pope John XXIII change or "correct" this practice?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.