Logo

The Congo’s killing fields

Thursday, July 24, 2008
The Congo’s killing fields
ShareThis
Families separated. Millions left for dead. Do we share some of the blame?

Patrick Mwnyamahord knows where his father is buried because a neighbor showed him that small place. What he doesn't know is how his father got there, and there was no one he could safely ask, not then. Twelve years ago he and his family made one of a series of sudden escapes from the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) into nearby Burundi. On this particular exodus his father was too ill to travel and the family had to leave him.

"When we got back, he was dead," Patrick says, "and I don't know if he was killed by the enemy or by his illness. I don't know what happened to him." The "enemy" who may or may not have killed his father is a little hard to determine as well.

It could have been a gang of run-of-the-mill bandits taking advantage of the DRC's general craziness, or it could have been a group of Hutu irregulars fighting Tutsi rebels or government troops or both. It may even have been a neighbor of a different tribe who took offense at his father's ethnicity and advantage of his weakness. Members of Patrick's tribe are often set upon by larger groups in the chaotic killing field that has been the Congo's lot off and on-mostly on of late-since its 1960 independence.

The Democratic Republic of Congo, previously Zaire (its moniker under the despotic reign of Mobutu Sese Seko), straddles the equator in Central Africa. It is Africa's third largest country, the size of the entire United States east of the Mississippi. The country's 60 million people represent more than 250 distinct ethnic groups, and about half of the population is Catholic.

The thousands of refugees and mutilated survivors are testimony to the mindless brutality that has consumed this nation since a series of destabilizing conflicts began in 1996, when Tutsi pursuit of the Hutu perpetrators of the Rwandan genocide across the Congo's borders began a series of clashes that can be described as ethnic and political. But they also have roots in competition over the Congo's bountiful resources, particularly the precious metals that are currently helping to power the industrialized world's high-tech lifestyle even as their extraction delivers low-tech misery to the DRC.

According to the International Rescue Committee as many as 5.4 million people have died in this African holocaust since 1998, making it the world's deadliest documented conflict since World War II.

The suffering has gone largely unnoticed in the West. The United Nations has only recently achieved a fragile success in curtailing it. In January the Congolese government and 22 armed groups signed a cease-fire and peace agreement in the DRC city of Goma. The Congolese government set up a peace program for eastern Congo called the Amani Program and appointed Abbé Apollinaire Malu Malu, a Catholic priest, to organize the efforts.

All signatories to the Goma accord committed to stop any human rights abuses, but since the peace negotiations at least 86 civilians have disappeared or been executed, including some children, and at least 500 women and girls have been raped. Tutsi, Mai-Mai, and Hutu militias remain armed and ready to fight; child soldiers continue to be "recruited" in village conscription raids.

How often did Patrick and his family flee such "problems," his word for the violence that has assailed his community? Hands wave away the futility of trying to determine a specific figure. "Many, many times," say Francine and Serieux, Patrick's sister and brother, now sharing a couch in a Chicago apartment. "Many, many times," Patrick agrees.

Throughout their childhood, Patrick and his siblings were forced to fend for themselves as communal violence erupted, sometimes while they were at school.

"We would get a message: ‘It is not safe to go home,' " remembers Francine, and so the children would depart on foot for Burundi alone for a later rendezvous with their parents and other family members in a refugee camp.

Along the way, if they were lucky, they would be harassed by members of other tribes or robbed of what little they carried by armed men or soldiers at improvised checkpoints. If they were unlucky, they would not make it to the border alive.

Have they lost family members during such flights? It is a silly question. "Oh, many, many," the young refugees say, before leafing through a family photo album, emotionlessly pointing out the survivors, the wounded, and the dead.

Bordering nations that have been involved in the Congo's civil clashes have joined in on the plunder of the DRC's resources and, according to many, prolonged the conflict as a cover for the economic windfall. Primitive gold, copper, and coltan mining operations established and battled over by regional proxies or local warlords are often staffed by child soldiers or enslaved civilians.

Rudimentary operations connect to sophisticated global commercial networks that acquire the extracted metals for jewelry or computer or cell phone components.

While many U.S. consumers may have become aware of the phenomenon of blood diamonds, few are as familiar with these other conflict resources and hardly think of the technological marvels in their hands as "blood gadgets." But the explosion in cell phone use over the last decade and a half has fueled and intensified the violence in the Congo.

Anneke Van Woudenberg, senior researcher for New York-based Human Rights Watch, has tracked the interaction of Western commercial interests with the mayhem in the Congo.

"We live in a globalized world," Van Woudenberg says, "and we need to ask questions about the products we buy, such as gold, diamonds, or mobile phones. Where did the goods come from? Were they ethically sourced?" While a U.S. or European consumer can feel far removed from the Congo's turmoil, they are really only a cell phone keypad away. "It is our responsibility to ensure that we do not indirectly contribute to human rights abuses in far away places like the Congo."

After another outbreak of violence a few years ago, during which his family farm was looted and their many cattle, goats, and sheep stolen or slaughtered, Patrick and his family went on the road to Burundi and never looked back.

They endured a few years waiting in an increasingly insecure camp in Burundi (where a cousin was killed during a mortar attack) until they found sponsorship through Catholic Charities in the United States.

They finally landed in Chicago, on their feet for the most part, gainfully employed and trying to build a future. His younger siblings are in school; Patrick, now 26, plans to resume an education that had been frequently interrupted by violence. He hopes to become a biologist.

Would he return to the Congo someday? He shrugs, nods. "Yes, maybe. I would like to go back," he says.

"I would like to go back to our home," he says. "When there is peace."

Does he think that peace will come? Patrick shrugs.

"No," he says after a moment.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Blame?

My response to Jerry is this: is the author blaming America for all the woes in the DRC or simply pointing out one of the ways that we are not as removed from problems in other parts of the world as we would like to believe?

Jeff you are correct. This

Jeff you are correct. This isn't laying the blame on any one nation, but asking the question."Do we consumers share some of the responsibility for this horror?" An excellent article by Kathleen Kern "The Human Cost of Cheap Cell Phones" highlights what multinationals are prepared to do to get cheap coltan to bring us our cell phones and lap tops. There is a direct line from these conflicts to the consumer, so in that sense we do share some of the blame. The point isn't to make us feel guilty or defensive, but to make us aware of our connection to each other, and all we do and have comes at a cost, and it's usually a cost to somebody else.

Jeff, I messed up as I had

Jeff, I messed up as I had intended to make my post a reply to Polly/'s reply which stated simply: Yes we are partially responsible.

I agree that even though our relationship to the problem in the Congo is extremely remote, the problem is of such horror  and magnitude it is an important subject for U.S. Catholic to discuss as well as discuss ways we can make a change.

However, I believe asking the question "Are We to Blame?" is a little over the top.  As my post suggests, I believe some are too caught up in America bashing.  I'm all for self reflection and national reflection, but I believe in  both cases it can become destructive if the good in one's self or one's nation is not recognized.

 

Agreed, it is all about

Agreed, it is all about balance. Yet, I would be as careful about reading any criticism automatically as "America bashing" as I would about losing sight of the goodness in America because of some of her sins. There are collective sins as well as individual ones. We need to be honest and pay attention to both.

Re: Blame?

As in all things, there is a need for balance; it does us no good to simply bash ourselves, yet it also is important to recognize that we as a country (like we as individuals) are both saints and sinners - at the same time! With the grace of God, may we become more aware of both our light and our darkness, and may the former outshine the latter.

Kevin Clarke's picture

Poor choice of words?

We seem to be getting bogged down in this word, blame. Perhaps it was a poor choice.

I think I was merely drawing attention to the interconnectiveness of the world we inhabit now. There is obviously an "Am I my brother's keeper" call to attentiveness to the suffering which persisits in the DRC and central Africa in general, but the ethical challenge of peacemaking and commerce goes beyond that.

I think in our culture as consumers we are not trained to think of the connections we make because of the things we buy. That consumer's role can be positive and it can be negative. Commerce can build up community, and it can tear it down. It can build relationship or it can encourage indifference. I think the growing role of fair trade movements and alternative commodity sourcing has been a positive force in sustaining community and threatened cultures in distant nations just as it has developed first awareness and then relationship between consumers and producers.

That positive role of commerce is completely lacking in the sourcing of commodities like coltan, however. Chinese and western mining interests are beginning to step in now to encourage stability. That may lead to the end of rule of the gun eventually, but such progress will be a far cry from the vibrant relationship that active and just commerce can produce.

Blame America First

If we don't send other people's sons to the Congo to die in a fight for which we have no interest, blame America.

If we send troops, blame America for any deaths from that point forward and spend the whole time criticizing America when our troops roughly treat someone who hacks the limbs off children.

Blame America if American retailers do not screen the components of foreign manufacturers like Nokia.

Blame America if American retailers do screen components beause of the direct or indirect harm it does to African countries.

Do we share some of the

Do we share some of the blame? YES

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.