Logo

The fight over fighting poverty: CCHD and the push for reform

Monday, June 14, 2010
The fight over fighting poverty: CCHD and the push for reform
CAMINOS San Francisco/Ken Touchton/©USCCB. All rights reserved.
ShareThis

 

 

Is the bishops’ work to empower the poor Catholic enough? An alliance of pro-life groups says it’s not.

It was the brainchild of a Chicago priest, Michael Dempsey, in the 1960s, and it has blossomed over the past 40 years into one of the most effective, sustained anti-poverty efforts ever attempted in the United States. In 2010 the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD) is funding some 250 groups in the United States, wrestling with issues such as education, jobs, health care, violence, economic development, and access to public services.

Unlike traditional direct help to the poor through Catholic Charities offices and St. Vincent DePaul societies, the Campaign is aimed at the systemic roots of poverty by helping the poor help themselves. At least half the board members of every CCHD-funded organization must be low-income residents of the community where the work is going on.

"Across our nation, CCHD is needed now more than ever in these difficult economic times when so many families are suffering and poverty is growing," says Bishop Roger Morin, chairman of the U.S. bishops' subcommittee on the CCHD.

But since last fall the Campaign has been under continuous public criticism.

An alliance of some 20 pro-life organizations called Reform CCHD Now (RCN) launched a barrage of specific charges and called for Catholics to boycott the Campaign's 2009 November collection. CCHD has funded and continues to fund "groups that openly oppose the church's teachings," declared RCN, "including support for abortion rights, legalized prostitution, and gay marriage."

The effort continues through publications, online articles and blogs, mailings to priests and bishops, and frequent appearances of spokespersons on radio, TV, and YouTube.

The persistence had an effect: Six U.S. bishops refused to allow the 2009 CCHD collection to be taken up in their dioceses. John Carr, executive director of Justice, Peace, and Human Development for the bishops' conference, says he expects to see at least a 5 percent reduction in 2009 contributions, though he attributes it to a combination of the lingering effects of the recession as well as RCN activity. Still, the question of the long-range impact of the campaign against the Campaign remains.

The bishops' charity

Dempsey, a Chicago pastor, had no idea such a controversy would ever arise when he conceived the idea for the Campaign. He had gone door to door in his poverty-stricken parish and asked the people how the church could best serve them. Many indicated that more than charity, they needed the skills, encouragement, and support to address the societal injustices they faced on a daily basis.

When he became an auxiliary bishop of Chicago in 1968, Dempsey brought his experience and his vision with him to the National Conference of Catholic Bishops. He called for a new national thrust to empower local self-help organizations to be funded by an annual nationwide collection. In the wake of the Second Vatican Council, with its call for the church to open its doors to "the joys and hopes, the griefs and anxieties" of the people of the world, "especially the poor," Dempsey's plan was adopted wholeheartedly by the bishops, and he was named the first director of the Campaign in 1970.

Though Dempsey died in 1974 at the age of 55, the Campaign from the start encountered a cheerful response from Catholic parishes. Today the yearly collection draws some of the largest contributions given to any Catholic collection, averaging more than $11 million a year, despite the recession. Seventy-five percent of the collection goes to the national office, which grants funds to applicants all over the county. The remaining 25 percent is given to dioceses to be distributed locally. All grants are screened at both the national and local level.

Many CCHD-funded organizations are in large metropolitan regions. For example, the Chinese Staff and Worker Association in New York City began receiving grants in the 1970s to assist badly paid immigrants laboring in Chinatown garment factories. Over the years the association has helped workers reclaim some $50 million in denied wages, created an independent restaurant workers union, and gained wage increases for all the state's tipped employees.

Other Campaign recipients are in rural areas. Since the Statewide Organizing for Community eMpowerment (SOCM) in East Jackson, Tennessee received its first grant in 1974, the organization has won important battles to halt the spread of toxic waste from coal mining in the Cumberland Mountains.

On the offensive

The major members of the RCN alliance include the American Life League (ALL), an anti-abortion group founded in 1979, and Human Life International, created in 1981, both based in Virginia.

A newer voice is Texas-based Bellarmine Veritas Ministries, which calls itself a "Catholic grass-roots organizing ministry." Its founder, Rob Gaspar, was largely responsible for compiling the battery of accusations against CCHD in 2009, which other groups are disseminating, adding their own grievances as well.

Besides accusing some Campaign recipients of themselves flouting church guidelines by promoting abortion, same-sex marriage, or birth control or openly taking partisan political positions, many more are charged with being "partners with" or "associated with" or being "members of" other organizations holding positions contrary to the Catholic faith.

Frequently mentioned amid the charges is ACORN, the large community action network and longtime Campaign recipient. It became notorious in 2008 when it faced charges of embezzlement and voter fraud. Though cleared of wrongdoing, ACORN was investigated by CCHD at the time and cut off from funding that year and since.

Following Reform CCHD Now accusations, Carr and his staff investigated all the Campaign-supported organizations charged, and at least five have been defunded. For example, the Preble Resource Center in Portland, Maine, which serves the homeless, was ordered to return a $17,400 Campaign grant because it urged voters to vote no on a ballot measure to overturn the state's same-sex marriage law. Other organizations were exonerated of charges and a few are still undergoing scrutiny.

"We're trying to lift up a Catholic expression of Jesus' message to the world," Carr says. "But this kind of institutional funding is a complex enterprise. And when we've made mistakes in the past, we correct them."

These strong steps were welcomed by RCN, but they insist the guilty organizations represent only the tip of the iceberg. They identify 31 Campaign recipients that are publicly listed as members of the Center for Community Change, a Washington, D.C.-based organization that concentrates on poverty issues and provides training for community organizers. Though not funded by the Campaign, it was reported that the center had spoken favorably about reproduction rights and board members on its Generation Change project include advocates of gay rights or "radical" feminism.

Of special interest was the fact that Carr, the bishops' top Campaign overseer, was formerly the board chairman of the Center for Community Change. Carr responded that he has had no relationship with the center since 2005 and that during his chairmanship, the center never took any advocacy positions contrary to church teaching. Nevertheless, critics saw in these links an indication of how far the church is straying into enemy territory.

Deal Hudson, director of outreach to Catholics for George W. Bush's presidential campaigns, urged Belllarmine Veritas Ministries to call for the elimination of CCHD. "No amount of housecleaning is going to make this arm of the USCCB worthy of our donations," he wrote on his blog.

Robert McClory is professor emeritus of journalism at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois and author of Radical Disciple: Father Pfleger, St. Sabina Church, and the Fight for Social Justice (Lawrence Hill) to be released in October. This article appeared in the July 2010 issue of U.S. Catholic (Vol. 75, No. 7, pages 12-17).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

When it comes to charity

When it comes to charity there are two major outlooks: All charity should be private; some or most should be public. The latter is more realistic and humane. We need private charity, but it isn't sufficient, especially in large, complex societies, where many are left out. The homeless and needy can't wait for when the wealthy are moved to give, if ever.

Throughout human history, the tendency of societies has been for most money to end up in the hands of a few, often one person, a king, queen, or other ruler. That is why we formed our country, to counteract this tendency.
And the goals of our founders were nobler than starting a new government so that they could be the ones amassing all the wealth. No. One of their main goals was to “promote the general Welfare,” as clearly stated in the Preamble to the Constitution.

These days we have subverted this goal. We strongly resist promoting the general welfare, not even by another 3 ½ percent contribution from the wealthiest (whose parents or grandparents contributed at 90 percent). We see all we have as entirely ours, even if it is interest income, even if we produced no goods or provided no services to earn it.

This in a nation called Christian by many who say they believe in God and who say prayers, as in the Lutheran Book of Worship: “Merciful God, everything in heaven and earth belongs to you. We joyfully release what you have entrusted to us.” Yes joyfully. That’s Christianity.
A common way around doing this, however, is by demonizing government, so that it is almost a sin to pay taxes. Thus we deny the reality of a large complex society where individual charity is insufficient to help all those in need.

Ask the private charities. They appreciate your help, but they recognize the reality. They can’t do it alone. A structured safety net is required, one that can be provided only by government, especially a government of the people, by the people and for the people.

Charity

Myself and a group of concerned parents of children with developmental disabilities are hoping to raise "seed money" to develop plans to build housing for adults with special needs ( Autism ) who will not be able to speak for themselves or otherwise make their way in the adult world . We plan to apply for grants to build housing units on a 100 acre tract of land adjacent to Leg-Up Farms, which serves as a therapy center for children with developmental disabilities. Our families will give everything they have in an effort to build a sustainable model for the future of all children who will grow into adults who need our help . This is a Catholic cause / a not for profit effort that will require public support to be successful . This is the reality . Our church was never meant to be exclusive . Please consider helping us . www.legupfarm.org

Lots of confusion

evident in the comments regarding socialism, Church Teachings, Liberation Theology, social justice, and what various organization's agendas are. Seems to me, in any case, that CCHD is too big and runs contrary to the concept of subsidiarity in the process. Better to support your local parish and diocese. Unfortunately, we are facing a time when "Catholic" claimed is not necessarily indicative of conformance to Church Teachings and "social justice" is not necessarily a christian undertaking but a progressive program to control people and wealth.

Al I agree that the Church

Al I agree that the Church with its redistribution of the other fellows money has gone far astray from its roots"a fisher of mens' souls" to "collectivation".No longer are we to have individual rights ;BIG BROTHER will do everything for you all you have to do is look the other way while your standard of living plummets.One of the tenets of the 1963 american communist party was to change the church from a spiritual entity to a social one that they could influence I think they have been very successful in their stated goal

Lots of confusion

What a "leap" from simple criticism to demonizing the opposition. Al from F1 promotes polarization by implying that his/her adversary is an orginization that sets out "to control wealth and people". C'mon!Be different! Be honest! How can you possibly crawl into a corporation's collective head and universally declare their motivation to be so supremely evil? Those are of big-sounding but hollow words; all "sound and fury signifying nothing".FS

Demonization?

At least he is not charging racism, greed, sexism, nativism, sexism and all the other hateful charges made by the left.

Al made no claim on motivation of his opposition or claimed it was supremely evil. People who advocate big goverment and high taxation believe they are doing good by controlling people and wealth.

Community Organizers, Huh!

The author is a shill. He start out sounding balanced and simply reporting the information, at the top of page two begins to attack the motives of those opposing the direction of CCHD - as if he can read their hearts!

I spent many years around community organizers and they never accomplished anything except to chip away at decency of those they encounter by filling them up with Alinsky-styled political views, mainly, "Burn down the system".

If you wonder why Catholics will soon be forced to perform abortions and dispense birth control or risk their jobs (and some reading this think this is normal) and have no conscience rights you can point to the very effective tactics promoted by Saul Alinsky whose early work was focused on indoctrinating Catholic priests.

See the connection: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymwguwy5BCw

Ask yourself, who has done more to provide hope and who has perpetuated the distruction of the hope of the poor for their own political gain - Charitable organizations like Mother Theresa's or groups like ACORN. The answer is simple yet we spend all this money on propping up these phony groups.

It's all about making you FEEL like you're helping while you fund their agenda. Duh!

CCHD Petition

Most devout Catholics would never knowingly support pro-abortion groups.

Yet on November 21st, many Catholics throughout the Arlington Diocese (and America) will unwittingly donate to organizations that promote abortion, homosexual marriage, and contraception.

That is because, despite the extensive publicity regarding CCHD’s funding of questionable groups, Bishop Paul S. Loverde of the Diocese of Arlington plans to go forward with the collection next month for CCHD.

Most people already know that CCHD gave millions of dollars to ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) before news of ACORN’s scandalous activities made national headlines. However, many people are not aware that CCHD continues to fund dozens of similar “community organizing” groups that promote abortion, contraception, homosexual marriage and other activities that are in direct conflict with Church teachings.

Hundreds of parishioners have already urged Bishop Loverde to withdraw his support of CCHD by signing the Prayerful Petition found at www.NoMoreCCHD.com We remain hopeful that Bishop Loverde will join other American bishops who have already withdrawn their support for CCHD.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey E. Knight

Washington, VA 22747

cchd

AMEN!THANK YOU FOR TAKING A STAND.I would like to see a list of the organizations they contribute to.

cchd

I have gone on cchd website,Catholic charities website USCCB website all of them silent on where the money goes.Why are they so secretive about who they contribute to;until I get some info on where my money is going I will no longer contribute to any basket in the church but rather I will send my money to St.Judes' children hospital ,Smile Train ,etc .No more secret contributions to "ACORN"or "LA RAZA"

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. Links are not allowed and comments with them will be moderated or deleted. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.