Promises to keep
Barack Obama’s election was historic, but can his presidency be great?
At a time of historic economic, social, and strategic challenges, the election of Barack Obama offers Americans the hope that we can rise above the many forces pulling us down, but more, that we can even rise above the worst of ourselves—the original sin of racism and the lingering structural toxins of prejudice and discrimination.
As Mr. Obama prepares to go to Washington, we find ourselves at a “Now what?” moment. The obstacles before us are historic, and the pressure on this new administration to deliver on its theme of change is enormous. Here are some agenda items to consider in these first 100 days:
On health care: Obama has targeted the deplorable state of our health care system for reform, but his strategy for healing it relies on some of the same free-market mechanisms that are already driving U.S. health care into the ground. Surely we can be more imaginative, more bold in addressing this chronic structural dysfunction.
Finding a way to take the profit hounds out of the delivery of health services in America should be part of the discussion toward building a rational system. Perhaps before locking into a new approach, it is time to open this matter up to a real, transparent debate rather than continuing to hash out a fix among the system’s competing and self-serving health sector interests.
On the federal budget: All bets should be off as we confront growing budget deficits in balance against U.S. social needs. Defense spending cannot be sacrosanct while basic services and the future of our children are put on the budget block. Why? Ask bank robber Willie Sutton: “Because that’s where the money is.”
On Iraq: Obama has promised to wind down America’s intervention in Iraq. How can he conduct a strategic withdrawal that protects American service members and overall security without further imperiling the people of Iraq?
On abortion: Many pro-life Catholics put their careers and reputations on the line to argue for a vote for Obama. How can he begin to work past the rhetoric to build a social structure that encourages those facing an unplanned pregnancy to choose life instead of death? How can the church help?
On the threat of global terrorism: Obama understands that America’s comprehensive security concerns cannot be resolved through the application of brute military force alone. Can he convince the public and Congress that soft-power solutions to blunt the threat of Islamist maximalists are also essential to long-term success against this amorphous, evolving threat?
On energy independence: As the price of oil declines, the sense of urgency on alternative energy threatens to diminish even as new voices and lobbying campaigns promote retrograde and dangerous solutions. Will Obama be able to stay his focus on rational, sustainable energy solutions?
On the economy: The Catholic Church has long advocated an economic structure built in service to humanity—all humanity—not the other way around. We have recently experienced the latest reminder of the wisdom of that injunction.
How will Obama craft a just economic order out of the latest dust pile generated by America’s faith in liberalism’s free-market wonderworks. There will be powerful forces seeking to recreate an order that protects the special interests and comfort of the few against the crying needs of the many.
Can we begin to build a new, sustainable economic order that offers opportunity and advancement to all Americans while stewarding the gifts of creation and lifting up our brothers and sisters in the developing world?
Obama has proven that he can see clearly, think critically, and move effectively, but running a crisp campaign is one thing, surviving the murky realities of Foggy Bottom and its hazardous environs something else entirely.
It’s nice to believe in change, but in this life you have to work hard for it, too. Can Obama’s be a great presidency? Maybe. We just need to apply some of the same yes-we-can-do spirit that brought this unlikely candidate from the streets of Chicago all the way to Pennsylvania Avenue.
Kevin Clarke is a senior editor at U.S. Catholic and online content manager at Claretian Publications. This article appeared in the January 2009 (Volume 74, Number 1; page 46) issue of U.S. Catholic.
I'm only trying to help you Iorr!
By John Sanchez (not verified) on Tuesday, May 25, 2010The socialist countries of europe are going bankrupt from all their social programs.. The U.S. is as well, now $12.5 trillion in debt and can barely make the interest payments! Raising taxes is robbing the country of investment capital that is used for innovation and expansion for more job growth! Does any of this mean anything to u Iorr???
Seriously, would u vote for anyone if U knew they would murder someone????? These are serious questions IORR! Take up your cross!
Future of Barack Obama
By Kevin Cushing (not verified) on Friday, May 14, 2010He's a politian seeking high office and fame, so I'm not sure whether his stands are really due to concern for others or in order to increase his popularity. One example: he was forced to issue that executive order to forbid abortions from being funded by federalo funds, in order to pass the health care bill. Like most Democrats, he's pro-choice. However, I do admire him
Regarding all officeholders: How many stands come from real values and how many are from horse-trading to get votes and win elections?
Politics
By IORR (not verified) on Friday, May 14, 2010I have a book written by a veteran of the Tammany Hall days in New York a century ago. In a chapter titled "Good Graft and Bad Graft" the author points out the difference between an politician who seeks election to serve the public then in office makes deals to do it and one who seeks public office solely for personal gain. A third kind is the person so idealistic that they will not compromise. These are almost never elected and if elected are ineffective at serving their constituents. I think President Obama is the first kind.
Obama
By Joseph Ritz (not verified) on Tuesday, January 27, 2009One hopes he can be great, that's why many of us pro-life Catholics voted for him.
You are clearly anything but pro-life... [comment edited]
By John Sanchez (not verified) on Monday, May 24, 2010You voted for the most pro-abortion leader in U.S. history... [comment edited] I THINK YOU ARE PERFECTLY FINE WITH THAT AS LONG AS OBAMA CARRIES OUT YOUR SOCIALIST AGENDA OF REDISTRIBUTING THE WEALTH (TAKING FROM OTHERS INSTEAD OF ENCOURAGING CHARITY).
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.
Baby Killers
By IORR (not verified) on Tuesday, May 25, 2010Wow John, great way to encourage dialog. If someone is a baby killer for voting for President Obama then there are a ton of Catholic baby killers walking around including priests. We did not vote for President Obama because of abortion. Hopefully abortions will be reduced under his administration. They usually are under Democratic ones, there were more under Bush than Clinton. As far as your Conservative rant about governments taxing citizens for the common good, spending part of the income of one individual on another, what you call redistributing the wealth, well, that's just fine with the Church, it's what governments are allowed and supposed to do. It's a long, long way from Socialism. This idea that governments shouldn't do anything directly to help individuals, that any aid to individuals or groups should come solely from voluntary charity just doesn't square with Catholic teaching. It's extreme Individualism, what the Church condemns as Americanism. Look it up. Taxing citizens for programs that benefit them and/or others is not Socialism or Communism. It's what normal modern governments do. If you want to take your flintlock and go off into the Rugged Individualism Forest join a reenacting group because that's not how people live today and the Church says that's a step in the right direction. Yours is a step the other way.
OBAMA GIVES MILLIONS IN TAX $$$ TO UN FOR ABORTIONS
By John Sanchez (not verified) on Tuesday, May 25, 2010If a leader tells you iorr, that he wants to reduce the # of abortions and turns around to fund abortions in china than he is a liar and a babykiller. Anyone, a catholic, a priest, including babykiller bush, that votes for obama knowing that he is pro-abortion is evil... That includes you Iorr but maybe that can change. If your daughter or son was killed by a neighbor, how much respect would you have for that neighbor killing just that one person you loved dearly??? The same goes for obama, bush and hitler, who all have the blood of innocent babies on their hands! You Iorr, and others catholic or not, have got to make a change in your!
FOFF
By IORR (not verified) on Tuesday, May 25, 2010John,
You've insulted me personally. I'm done with you.
IORR


