Logo

Life support: U.S. Catholic readers on what it means to be pro-life

Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Life support: U.S. Catholic readers on what it means to be pro-life
ShareThis

 

 

The pro-life movement is hardly monolithic, those responding to U.S. Catholic's Reader Survey reveal, and that's a good thing. Activists, nurses, priests, and parents are all needed to create a culture of life.

Two things become immediately apparent whenever Catholics are tapped to discuss the role of faith in defending human life.

First: Most American Catholics support the sanctity of human life, all human life-"from womb to tomb," as the old saying goes. In a recent survey of U.S. Catholic readers and website visitors, a full 60 percent said that being pro-life means everything from opposing abortion and assisted suicide to alleviating poverty and injustice. A meager 3 percent said pro-life means opposing abortion only.

Second: "Religion and politics don't mix"-at least not very well whenever Catholics try to cast a vote consistent with their beliefs. Michael Goodboe of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida speaks for many, complaining that the pro-life movement is "based too much on politics," rather than values.

Others, like Jeanie Lewis of Chicago, dread "the screech factor" that becomes ever more deafening during the heat and hype of an election year. For 85 percent of respondents, confrontational rhetoric and tactics detract from the pro-life movement's message.

Whether they think that abortion should always be illegal (43 percent) or that the government shouldn't prohibit others from making that decision (40 percent), the survey respondents agree that abortion isn't just an issue up for discussion every four years. Being pro-life seems to be a way of life for all sides.

 In the year following a heated election season, the pro-life movement has struggled to find its place. Catholics remain an important group to the new administration, especially in the health care reform debate. For Catholics with a broad definition of pro-life, universal access to health care is an important goal, as long as abortions aren't being funded.

A vocal minority of Catholics protested President Barack Obama being honored at the University of Notre Dame, as well as Edward Kennedy's Catholic funeral, but most Catholics were supportive of both. The week after Kennedy's funeral also brought the surprise resignation of Scranton Bishop Joseph Martino, who had clashed with many for insisting Vice President Joe Biden, a Scranton hometown boy, and other pro-choice Catholics be barred from Communion.

Fifty-seven percent of survey respondents are proud of the U.S. bishops' vocal and uncompromising stand on the right to life of the unborn. Still, Bishops John M. Darcy and John R. Quinn recently pondered in America magazine what the bishops could have done differently about the Notre Dame controversy to facilitate a better dialogue among key Catholic decision makers. Catholics everywhere will want to note-if not also model-Quinn's suggestion that his fellow bishops adopt the "policy of cordiality" already so evident "in the example of the Holy See."

When it comes to bishops, one is particularly notable: Cardinal Joseph Bernardin was invoked repeatedly by our survey respondents. In the early 1980s, the now-deceased Chicago cardinal linked abortion to other assaults on vulnerable forms of human life. He won over a multitude of hearts and minds by pointing out Catholicism's inherent consistency on all life issues, which he likened to the "seamless garment" of Christ.

"There are so many pro-life issues going on right now," agrees a Colorado reader. "How can you separate one from all of them? Are unborn children any more precious than children who are already born and need education or health care? Are the people who pick your food and butcher your meat any less precious to God?"

Andover, Minnesota's Kim Jensen, however, takes issue with that view: "Catholics seem to think that all issues-pollution, immigration, war, torture, poverty, health care-are on an equal footing with abortion. But abortion is far more serious; the victims are the most innocent. We must battle all forms of social injustice, but right-to-life issues must take precedence. Without the right to live, no other right matters."

Father Bill Kenneally, who serves in Chicago, patiently points out, "Our Cardinal Bernardin tried to describe common ground on this issue," but "the American bishops were reluctant to follow his lead."

Reluctant, indeed. Perhaps that's one of the reasons 36 percent of readers doubt that common ground can ever be found between the pro-choice and pro-life camps-and why 35 percent believe abortion trumps all other pro-life causes. Abortion "is the bishops' only stand in most cases," laments a reader in Saginaw, Michigan. "Why are Catholic Church officials so quiet about wars or poverty?"

Angela Stockton of Clermont, Florida points to another black eye for the bishops: "I don't believe the bishops will ever appreciate how the pedophile scandals destroyed their credibility on any moral issue for large numbers of Americans."

One thing respondents agree on is that pro-life concerns are based in faith. "A totally consistent ethic of life is the heart-and-soul basis of Catholic Social Teaching," insists Joe Walker of East Grand Rapids, Michigan. "The creation story from the Book of Genesis teaches that all life ‘is very good.' God is the decider of life, and humans must respect that."

"My compass for life is God," says Jessica Lombardi of Norfolk, Virginia. "His commandment ‘Thou shalt not kill' states it perfectly; there are no but's in the commandments."

What's tricky, of course, is that in-vitro fertilization and hospital ventilators didn't make an appearance with Moses on Mount Sinai. Some of the lines between what is and isn't seen as a viable life have become blurred as new technologies have emerged. These tools tempt humans to play God, allowing us to produce human life outside the womb, prolong life, or pluck it away when we see fit.

Consider a more everyday example: artificial birth control. Readers such as Eileen Smith of Dearborn, Michigan include Natural Family Planning as part of "a heartfelt response to being pro-life and the marriage covenant." A slight majority of readers, however, believe the Catholic Church would be more credible in fighting abortion if it reconsidered its teaching on artificial methods.

"The church has painted itself into a corner on the birth control issue," says Spring Hill, Florida reader Keith Burbridge who, with his wife Rita, has fostered unwed mothers through Catholic Charities and adopted children born to moms who couldn't keep them.

From Rita's experience as a nurse, she's found that there are no easy answers: "When I worked in the emergency room, I cared for a few women who came-sometimes near death-as a result of botched illegal abortions. It was too late for one woman, whose death orphaned her other children. I have prayed for her and her family for 40 years. The women I saw were usually in desperate situations, and I sympathized with their miserable decision.

"Illegal abortions will resume if present law is changed. I can't stand the thought. But neither can I stand the thought of the millions aborted today. I believe that the answer is public policy that promotes contraception and keeps abortion from being used as contraception. Contraception is the lesser of two evils; thanks to modern science it is now safe and effective."

Education is key, the Burbridges and other Catholics who have worked in the trenches on pro-life issues agree.

Sometimes education needs to be aimed at the general public, as a reader from Appleton, Wisconsin attests: "I have seen little done to educate the public on the fact that this baby truly is a person. Ultrasounds are what educate many mothers. As a young nurse I baptized many babies after a mother's miscarriage, some as little as 2 inches. Who can say this isn't a person?"

Sometimes, though, the education is as simple as letting a frightened woman know she has alternatives. Illinois reader Alma Hermes knows this all too well. "I worked with Birthright for 14 years. Whenever I met with clients who were considered to be abortion-minded, I asked, ‘If I could solve all these problems for you, what would you really like to do?' " she says. "With only one exception in those 14 years, the answer was always, ‘Have the baby!' So then we set out to work on the problems."

My faith motivates me to be pro-life because . . .

I believe in the sanctity of life as created by God. Only God can take life away.
Bobbi DeVries
Jenison, Mich.

The dignity of human life is the core of our faith. Abortion should be unthinkable for Catholics.
Rick Mills
Coldwater, Mich.

Although my faith is obviously a very big part of my motivation, I believe that I would still be staunchly pro-life without it. I don't know how anyone could justify that it's OK to kill a child in the womb-the place where a child should be the safest.
Mary Miller
Stillman Valley, Ill.

All life is sacred-not just the life of the unborn.
Jack Beschta
Oregon, Wis.

Killing is wrong, period, especially the killing of innocents.
Gregory Gauthier
Tampa, Fla.

God created life, Jesus Christ saved life, and the Holy Spirit animates life.
Mike Haney, O.F.M.
Bayfield, Wis.

I am not pro-life. Abortion is really between a woman, the person who fathered the baby, and their God. The church should actively show the many alternatives to abortion.
Daniel Lata
Chicago, Ill.

The most creative response I've seen to the abortion issue is . . .

"Thank you, Mom, for choosing life."
Steve Trainor
Carlock, Ill.

President Obama's "Nobody likes abortion" comment. Abortion came about because of Christianity's lack of response to the causes of abortion.
Linus Mercil
Baton Rouge, La.

Asking "What if President Obama's mother had chosen abortion?"
Helen Wise
Springfield, Ill.

Allowing desperate women to leave their newborn babies at hospitals rather than leaving them somewhere to die after birth.
Alice Rass
Mosinee, Wis.

Pictures of a fetus sucking its thumb.
S. Grunst
Holland, Mich.

Letting people know what really happens during an abortion.
Name withheld
Superior, Wis.

Father Andrew Greeley said, "It is hard to convince people of your ‘pro-life' position if you are screaming ‘baby-killers' at them."
Bill Johnston
Tacoma, Wash.

Humanae Vitae, which few of us have actually read and lived.
Titus Trube
Warner Robins, Ga.

Accounts from women who are remorseful for having an abortion.
Name withheld
Kingsport, Tenn.

My 19-year-old college-freshman daughter placing her son in an open adoption, going on to finish college, and becoming a speaker about adoption options.
S. W. Weigert
Mundelein, Ill.

What bothers me the most about the usual pro-life/pro-choice dispute is . . .

That it hasn't accomplished anything!
Jo Lauer
Sherwood, Ark.

Animal-rights activists seem to have more clout than those trying to educate people about the horrendous procedure of partial-birth abortion.
Name withheld
Eden Prairie, Minn.

All the vitriol. Say rosaries quietly-not in the driveway of the clinic.
Virginia Magers
Jackson, Miss.

The lack of respect, especially the unwillingness to acknowledge the good intentions of opponents.
Jean Sartor
Brighton, Mass.

That "pro-choice" doesn't really equal "choice." It seems to equal abortion only.
Name withheld
Cape Girardeau, Mo.

There seems to be more concern over the unborn than the born of all ages.
Peg Schwendeman
Hampton, Minn.

I think denying Communion to a pro-choice politician is . . .

Counterproductive. We need to be working together to support all aspects of life, not sitting in judgment of politicians who have the duty to make tough calls.
Linda A. Jani
Macomb, Ill.

Absolutely right. We need to take a stand. This is a most public slap in the church's face when these people are allowed to speak evil pro-choice words and receive Jesus in the same mouth!
Bridget DiCello
Drummonds, Tenn.

A wonderful idea-as soon as the same treatment is insisted upon for bishops who shelter child molesters.
Joseph Komadina
St. Louis, Mo.

Indefensible. They need the grace of the sacrament. Christ never turns anyone away from his table of love. He didn't hesitate to eat with the sinners.
Jeanne Scavone
Applegate, Mich.

My personal efforts in the pro-life movement include . . .

Listening to women who have had an abortion and assuring them of God's unconditional love and forgiveness-and suggesting they claim, name, and pray for their baby.
Sister Helen Walling, I.H.M.
Clinton, Mich.

Working for 25 years at a pro-life counseling center. These girls do not want abortions. They can see no other way.
Jan Shiplett
Milton, Fla.

Voicing my opinion against killing of any kind.
Jacquelyn Stahler
Fayetteville, Ga.

Supporting Planned Parenthood. They, unlike the "pro-lifers" I know, at least try in practical ways to prevent abortions.
Martin A. Berg
Oak Park, Ill.

Nothing. The radical fringe of the pro-life and pro-choice movements polarize me from taking a stand. Both groups need to find common ground and remove the radicals from their ranks.
Carolyn A. Ugowski
South Milwaukee, Wis
.

Supporting Project Rachel and giving personal help when approached.
Name withheld
St. Louis, Mo.

Belonging to Democrats for Life.
Martha Simms
Plymouth, Mich.

Taking part in the pro-life walks organized by our Knights of Columbus.
Beverly Mire
Lafayette, La.

Raising my 2-year-old grandson.
Name withheld
Clarksville, Ind.

General Comments

It's unbearable to listen to the impassioned oratory of old men and women, past child-bearing age, and priests and nuns who haven't a clue what it's like for young pregnant teens.
Name withheld
Elkhorn, Wis.

My youngest sister has moderate-level Down Syndrome and lives in a small group home. If anyone spent time with her or her seven housemates-if they could just see their zest for life-they would never support abortions.
Kathy Childs
Little Rock, Ark.

I exist only because I wasn't aborted. I was given up by my mother in the hospital in which I was born. My childhood was unhappy, but I never condemned my mother. I'm grateful to her for giving me life; I have tried to make the best use of it.
Joseph Ritz
Hamburg, N.Y.

All of life is sacred: the patients in the mental ward, the woman in jail, the migrant worker, the homeless man on the street, the elderly woman living alone-as well as the life of our enemies. It's not just about "saving babies."
Name withheld
Decherd, Tenn.

In my view, the proper definition of pro-life is:
Opposing abortion only - 3%
Opposing abortion and embryonic stem cell research. - 8%
Opposting all direct killing (abortion, war, capital punishment, assisted suicide). - 15%  
Opposing all of the above, plus working for peace and social justice and alleviating poverty. - 60%
Other - 14%

Abortion is by far the most egregious evil in the U.S. today and needs to be singled out and condemned above all concerns:
Agree - 35%
Disagree - 32%
Other - 13%

The primary focus of the pro-life movement should be:
Personal: Change people's minds and hearts. - 45%
Policy: Promote social policy to reduce abortions. - 34%
Legal: Overturn Roe v Wade and make abortion illegal. - 21%

The Catholic Church would be more credible in fighting abortion if it reconsidered its teaching on artificial birth control:
Agree - 55%
Disagree - 38%
Other - 7%

It's possible to find common ground between the pro-choice and pro-life movements:
Agree - 53%
Disagree - 36%
Other - 11%

The confrontational rhetoric and tactics of some in the pro-life movement detract from its message.
Agree - 85%
Disagree - 11%
Other - 4%

I think abortion should be legal:
Never. - 43%
When the mother's health is in serious danger. - 27%
In the case of rape or incest. - 21%
When the mother is seriously mentally ill. - 12%
Up to fetal viability. - 11%
At any time in the pregnancy. - 4%

Although I am personally opposed to abortion, I don't think the government should prohibit others from making that decision.
Agree - 40%
Disagree - 48%
Other - 12%

I am proud of the U.S. bishops' vocal and uncompromising stand on the right to life of the unborn.
Agree - 57%
Disagree - 27%
Other - 16%

By Mary Lynn Hendrickson, a writer and religious educator in Stoughton, Wisconsin. 

This article appeared in the November issue (Vol. 74, No. 11, pg. 18-22) of U.S. Catholic magazine.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The Anger of Pro-Choice Catholics

Many pro-choice Catholics are so filled with anger at the Church that they cannot stand to hear a person say that abortion is sinful. If I (or other pro-life Catholics)state that abortion is wrong, they respond with a litany of unfair accusations. "You think it is okay for priests to molest children!" (No, of course I don't.) "You think capital punishment is great!" (No to that as well.) "You want women to die! You want children to go hungry, suffer abuse, and die from rampant disease!" (Still no.) "You won't help women facing difficult pregnancies! You won't care for children who were born into difficult situations!" (Yes, I help financially, by volunteering, and through prayer, as do many pro-life Catholics.) And finally, "You don't know what it is like to face an unplanned pregnancy! You don't know what it's like to have a child with a disability!" (On those two counts, my answer is once again, "yes, I do.") Pro-choice Catholics seem to think that we who are pro-life don't understand the "real world." Yes we do. So did Jesus. Jesus would have NEVER said to a woman, "Go ahead, murder your baby." If he wouldn't have done it, why do Catholics? (Remember, by being pro-choice, a person IS saying, "Go ahead, murder your baby if you want to do so.")

What boggles my mind is how

What boggles my mind is how everything comes down to the priest sex scandal, as if I, or any ordinary Catholic, had anything to do with it. Unless I personally knew a priest who molested a child, personally kept that information to myself or reported it only to his superior, I am not a part of the problem and resent very strongly when someone brings it up in a discussion about something else, especially abortion.

The priest sex scandal does not justify abortion.

Down, off soap box.

Although my personal life

Although my personal life experiences have been different from yours, I agree with everything you said. I, too, as a pro-lifer have faced the same types of questions. I am not one of the pro-lifers who stands outside of clinics and prays the rosary. My opposition is expressed through education.

The best way to deal with people who bring up the questions you were bombarded with is to answer honestly. Of course, I have found that even honesty doesn't work with some pro-choicers. They're right and don't confuse them with the facts.

I remember being in a discussion on line about abortion and one of the posters said to show discuss without bringing in religion. So, I pointed out that each foetus has his/her own DNA, DNA that can only produce that particular individual human being, thus showing that the baby is not merely an abnormal growth of the mother's flesh, such as cancer or a canker sore. The pro-choicer denied the importance of DNA in identifying the foetus as a human being. Someone else pointed out that DNA is what helps identify the baby's father. The pro-choicer still threw DNA, and subsequent scientific arguments out.

I said it recalled a discussion I had in a classroom once when we were going over what happens during gestation and when. And one of the girls raised her hand, and stood up to say that if she were pregnant and wanted to have an abortion, there would be no heartbeat, no fingerprints or thumb sucking, etc. The baby would be just a blob of flesh attached to the uterus to be removed. To which one of the boys in the class responded: "Well, then, you wouldn't be pregnant and wouldn't need an abortion. You would have a tumor and need surgery."

Contraception

I don't think that anyone mentioned the single act that facilitates almost all of the culture of death...mainly the acceptance of artifical contraception. Abortion, high divorce rates, out of wedlock birth skyrocketting, and and overall decline in morality and respect for human life can be traced to our acceptance of artificail birth control.

ABC

The majority of Catholics disagree with you and the Church on contraception. Blaming it alone for the social ills you describe is simplistic. Divorce is easier and more accepted now, probably the biggest reason for its increase. Another is the Women's Rights movement. Women are in the work force and not as reliant on their husbands' incomes. Contraception undoubtedly has given them more options too so you have a point with that but many would not see that as a bad thing. Men and women no longer feel they need to stay in failed marriages. There were always abortions. Before legalized abortion they were illegal and known only to those involved. There were always out of wedlock births. They are more accepted now so more mothers keep their children. In the past they quietly put them up for adoption or had illegal abortions. I am so sick of the phrase "The Culture of Death". Every time I hear it I know what side of the political-cultural divide someone is on. The way it is used on EWTN and Ave Maria Radio seems to include virtually all popular culture. This extreme rejection of the modern world makes Catholicism look like a cult. The pope's attacks against secular culture reinforce this. To those who use it, "The Culture of Death" means everything they see around them. It's paranoid, reactionary and weird. I agree with the person who said that the bishops just don't get how the abuse cover-up scandal has destroyed their credibility to speak about anything.

Birth Control

You obviously have not studied artificial birth control and its devestating effects on society. Every country of the world - EVERY COUNTRY, once they legalized artificial birth control, within 2 generations, abortion was legalized.
You are probably a person who used artificial birth control, and therefore you think it is OK. It is NOT OK and is a mortal sin to participate in it.

Birth control not only

opens the door for abortion, but it also increases the number of divorces, adultery, homosexuality, and a host of other evils, such as euthenasia. It says that man, not God, is the author of life. It says that sex is no longer primarily about procreation. It is about "my pleasure alone."

The moral demise of a nation always precedes its ultimate demise.

One of the first things the Communists did after taking over a country was to destroy its morals. Why? Because an immoral people is always easier to enslave than a moral one.

Humanae Vitae 12 recognized

Humanae Vitae 12 recognized the equality of both the unitive and procreative aspects of sexual intercourse.

"This teaching, set for the by the Magisterium on numerous occasions, is founded upon the inseparable connection, willed by God and which man may not break on his own initiative, between the two significances of the conjugal act: the unitive significance and the procreative significance.....By safeguarding both these essential aspects, the unitive and the procreative, the conjugal act preserves in its fullness the sense of true mutual love and its ordination to man's most lofty vocation of parenthood."

But, then, of course, most Catholics do not accept the teachings of HV. Instead, they wish to separate the inseparable. But in elevating the one over the other (and this goes also to those who would advocate that the sex act is all about procreation) they are destroying the fullness of the purpose of the act, which is to become a unity as the Trinity is a unity.

Pro-life

Nowhere in the article is capital punishment decried. As Sister Helen Prejean says, "Most pro-lifers are only pro innocent life."
Are we satisfied that executions are now carried out by lethal injection instead of crucifixion, and so now the state taking of a human life is
acceptable. Shame on us that the cry to end abortions does not include the demand for an end to the death penalty. Amazing that no country in the European Union has the death penalty, and yet we want to consider ourselves a good "Christian" nation in name but not deed.

Abortion vs. death penalty

I agree with Kathy (well, kind of)....Some "pro-lifers" are very concerned about abortion, but not all that concerned about respecting life after birth.  That makes no sense.

But, we do need to make sure we distinguish though between abortion & death penalty.  They are not equal in gravity.  Abortion is never acceptable, and is the murder of innocent life.   However, death penalty can sometimes be within the State's authority.

Now, we have seen in some ways, with the passage of time, an increased awareness of human dignity.  Happily, most Western societies long ago moved beyond disemboweling people, torture chambers, etc.   (Although, we now see torture returning into the U.S. mainstream- which is shameful.)   Anyway, prison long ago became the norm of punishment, mostly due to the Quakers' vision.  Let's hope that we see the death penalty all but disappear... and let's also hope to see a move away from prison as being the norm of punishment.  Restorative justice, rather than punishment, needs to be explored.   We need more progress in this area, and an increased respect for all human life.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.