Born-again Catholics: Evangelicals crossing the Tiber
Former denizens of evangelical arenas are finding new homes in the age-old sanctuaries of Catholicism.
It took Mark Shea four tries to become a Catholic.
Raised without any religious instruction, Shea had embraced evangelical Christianity as a college student at the University of Washington in the late 1970s. “There was a little non-denominational group that came together on the dorm floor next to mine,” Shea says. “We got together for Bible study, Saturday night praise and worship, that sort of thing.”
Shea took his conversion to Christianity seriously, reading the Bible regularly and embracing the doctrines of his new faith with vigor. Over the next few years, though, he found that there were things that troubled him about evangelical Christianity, such as the way interpretations of scripture seemed to vary from congregation to congregation. Shea’s way of dealing with his doubts was to read voraciously. As he did so, he found himself increasingly embracing Catholic answers to his questions.
His path to Rome, however, was not a smooth one. During his first RCIA class, Shea was wrestling with some of the things he had done in college. “The priest sort of dismissed it. ‘Storms of youth, my lad,’ he told me. But I really wanted to know what the church taught about this.” Shea ultimately left the program.
He didn’t last much longer in his second attempt at RCIA. “The catechist was trying to explain the Exodus story, and he compared it to the American story of Paul Bunyan digging the Grand Canyon,” Shea says. “You weren’t meant to take it literally. I was pretty sure that this was not what the church taught about the Book of Exodus. I decided the class wasn’t helping me.”
In his third RCIA program, “the guy was scrupulously orthodox,” Shea recalls. Alas, he was also a terrible teacher. “He was reading something about the temptation of Jesus in the desert and said that ‘Jesus was not tempted interiorly,’ ” Shea says. “I raised my hand and asked him what it meant to be tempted if you weren’t tempted interiorly. He got this deer-in-the-headlights look and just re-read the same passage.” Shea dropped out of the class soon after that.
“Finally, in frustration, I did what evangelicals do,” Shea says. “I formed a study group.” Calling themselves the Seattle Catholic Study Group, Shea and a group of friends slowly worked their way through a catechism and various church documents. They focused particularly on doctrines that have divided Catholics and Protestants, such as the authority of scripture and prayer to Mary and the saints. In the end Shea and many others in the group were convinced that what the church taught was true.
Shea and his friends showed up at the office of a local priest and asked to be received into the Roman Catholic Church. The priest was a bit flummoxed to find himself presented with a group of evangelicals quoting church teaching. “I didn’t realize at the time that this was a ‘don’t try this at home’ kind of thing,” Shea says. After some extensive questioning, the priest agreed to receive them into the Catholic Church 10 days later on the Fourth Sunday of Advent in 1987.
Shea has gone on to become involved in the Catholic apologetics movement, writing a number of books, including By What Authority: An Evangelical Discovers Catholic Tradition (Our Sunday Visitor) and This Is My Body: An Evangelical Discovers the Real Presence (Christendom Press). Shea’s story resembles a number of other high-profile evangelicals who have converted (or, in some cases, “re-verted”) to Catholicism over the last two decades. They include scripture scholar Scott Hahn, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, literary critic Thomas Howard, and radio host Al Kresta.
Given the popularity of books and programs on conversion stories, such as Patrick Madrid’s Surprised by Truth series and EWTN’s The Journey Home, one could be forgiven for thinking that the conversion of evangelical Christians to Catholicism is a growing trend. The available evidence, however, suggests that there has been movement in both directions.
According to the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life’s 2007 Religious Landscape Survey, roughly 8 percent of Catholics were raised in other Christian denominations. This compares with 9 percent of evangelical Christians who were raised Catholic.
While high-profile conversions may make the news, the data suggest that the church loses more members than it brings in. “For the Catholic Church, four people leave for every one who joins. That is a much higher ratio than for any other religious group,” says Greg Smith, senior researcher at the Pew Forum.
At the same time Smith believes it is important not to downplay the magnitude of conversions to Catholicism. “Roughly 2.5 percent of American adults have converted to Catholicism. That is a huge number of people.”
Fast friends
It is easier today than ever for evangelicals to consider entering the Catholic Church as the historic animosity between the two communities is on the wane.
“Vatican II was critical,” argues Mark Noll, an evangelical historian who teaches at the University of Notre Dame. “The fact that the Catholic Church was encouraging the faithful to read scripture and talking about the church as the ‘people of God’—which sounded like the Protestant idea of the ‘priesthood of all believers’—started to erode some of the prejudices that evangelicals had about Catholics.”
Noll notes that Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI have been highly regarded in the evangelical community. “Their writings are very focused on the person of Jesus Christ and very attentive to scripture. That’s important to evangelicals.”
Politics has also played a role. After Roe v. Wade legalized abortion in 1973, evangelicals and Catholics often found themselves on the same side of a burning political issue. During the 2004 presidential campaign, Noll says, one evangelical leader wryly observed that “we used to be afraid that John Kennedy would follow the pope. Now we are afraid that John Kerry won’t follow the pope!”
The rapprochement between the two communities was strengthened by the 1994 statement Evangelicals and Catholics Together, drafted by a group convened by Charles Colson of Prison Fellowship Ministries and Father Richard John Neuhaus, founder of the journal First Things. Neuhaus, a former Lutheran minister, had converted to Catholicism in 1990 and was ordained a priest a year later. He died in 2009.
J. Peter Nixon is a regular contributor to U.S. Catholic.
This article appeared in the August 2011 issue of U.S. Catholic (Vol. 76, No. 8, pages 22-26).
Enough is enough!
By TomR (not verified) on Monday, July 18, 2011You converted a long time ago. Welcome, let's move on.
Most of these folks mentioned were unexceptional protestants when they converted and by now have spent most of their adult lives as Catholics. They don't have some special gnosis as poorly educated cradle Catholics seem to think.
Stop treating them like the greatest gifts since Cardinal Manning and GK Chesterton.
Conversion stories are great but their coverage is all out of proportion. At some point it's like going down to AA or the local Courage chapter to listen to testimonies irrelevant to one's own struggles.
I can't say that's the warmest welcome into the Church
By Richard M (not verified) on Monday, July 18, 2011...that I've ever heard.
How about a little charity?
It would appear this
By C.Rene (not verified) on Thursday, July 21, 2011It would appear this conversion stuff is over played. Take a look at EWTN.
Can't we just accept each other and work on common goals and get away from the narcissim?
This fascination with
By Shaun (not verified) on Thursday, July 28, 2011This fascination with converts appears to be a uniquely American phenomenon
Ex-catholic says "The church" is not based on Peter
By Desmond in Spain (not verified) on Saturday, July 16, 2011Yeshua said: You are A STONE (Petros, Gk) but (kai) on THIS ROCK, ME, Yeshua/Jesus, I will build my eklesia. There was no pope before the 4th century. James was the leader of the Jerusalem eklesia. Infallibility of the pope was initiated MANY centuries after the founding of the RC in the 4th century, and is a complete lie. Jesus said HE ALONE is the Way, the Truth and the Life. He made no reference to Mary or saints. Statues are an abomination and forbidden in 1st & 2nd Commandments. Mary was NOT ever a virgin. She proceded to have more children after normal sexual relations with Joseph. It is in the Gospels: "Thy mother and thy brothers are outside." Our sins are forgiven by GOD when we confess TO HIM and are washed by the Blood of Jesus. No indulgences, no purgatory, no priests, ONE INTERCESSOR BEFORE GOD, the Man Jesus/Yeshua, and Son of God. Leave the catholic and protestant churches and their anti-Semitism and replacement theology. Follow the simple Way
of the Messianic Jews and Gentiles.
The True Church
By Broflo (not verified) on Friday, July 15, 2011How many 'true churches' are there? THERE IS ONLY ONE! In Matthew 16:18 the Lord Jesus said to Peter: "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." The ONLY TRUE CHURCH is the one that the Lord is building, which consists of the ones "the Lord (is adding) to the church daily such as should be saved" (Acts 2:47). These are the ones to whom "flesh and blood hath not revealed (that Jesus is "the Christ, the Son of the living God")unto (them), but (his) Father which is in heaven" (Matthew 16:17,16). This Church are the true believers that "continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers" (Acts 2:42). These "churches of Christ" (Romans 16:16 have existed since the beginning in the midst of professing Christianity; for it can be said of it as of Israel: "They are not all Israel, which are of Israel" (Romans 9:6). One will be hard pressed to prove that the RCC is the true church; or for that matter, any professing Christian church, unless its doctrines are in conformity with the doctrines of "the gospel of the grace of God" (Acts 20:24); and in the light of solely the New Testament, the RCC has no semblance whatsoever of the Church the Lord Jesus is building!
Although I am a Baptist of the Reformed faith, that doesn't make me of His True Church, but only as I confess as Peter did who is Jesus, which includes ALL that He did to save sinners; and so I am of His Church which "the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Amen.
Hello Broflo
By Bad Meets Evil (not verified) on Friday, July 15, 2011You are correct, Jesus did say:
"And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."
But the popes are the direct successors of St Peter !
About the popes
By Broflo (not verified) on Saturday, July 16, 2011Who said that the popes were the successors of Peter? Not the Word of God! Even the apostle Peter did not claim such a ludicrous position. Nowhere in the Bible does one read of any of the apostles taking upon themselves the title of pope, including the apostle Paul; for he wrote to the Corinthian church: "Not for that we have dominion over your faith" (2 Cor.1:24), which the RCC gives the "pope"! In fact, he is considered to be "infallible", isn't that right? You know, that is an "antichrist" doctrine; and I'm afraid that unless God of His grace delivers you and every Roman Catholic from this "damnable heresy" (2 Pet.2:1), multitudes will perish in their sins for looking at man to be their "savior". "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ (and ONLY Him), and thou shalt be saved" (Acts 16:31). Amen.
Both Jesus and History
By Anonymous (not verified) on Monday, July 18, 2011said that the Popes were successors to the office He created and first installed Peter in. Most Protestants don't understand Scripture. They can parrot some of it, but they don't understand it, and certainly not in context.
When Jesus told Peter, "I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven." in Matt. 16:19, He was establishing a dynastic office, i.e., an office to which there were to be successors. Every first century Jew understood this. The king always had a royal steward, a second in command, who ran the kingdom in the king's absence (off to war, visiting other kingdoms, sick, etc.). Whatever this royal steward ruled (held bound or loosed), the king backed up upon his return. The symbol of the royal steward's office was a large key about 2-3 feet long which he carried over his shoulder. If the royal steward died, another was appointed to take his place. THIS is what we have in the office of Pope. An office established by Jesus Christ (our King!), to which He gave His full authority to govern, and to which there would be successors.
With regard to papal infallibility, it is only when declaring doctrines on faith and morals. It does NOT say the individual in the office of Pope is impeccable. He can sin, just like anyone else. He can make administrative errors, just like anyone else. It's just when he is teaching the Church on faith and morals, God won't allow him to make an error.
Your post indicates that you don't know the Bible at all. The Bible is not a bunch of snippets to be taken out of context. It must be read in context of the whole of Scripture, in light of Sacred Tradition (oral teaching passed on from Jesus to the Apostles and their successors, the bishops for 2000 years now), and in light of the living teaching office of the Church, the Magisterium (the Pope and the bishops in union with him). Anything else results in unceasing errors, as demonstrated by the never-ending splintering of Protestantism.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. Links are not allowed and comments with them will be moderated or deleted. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.

