Logo

Sing a new song: New music for the new Mass

Wednesday, April 20, 2011
ShareThis
Anyone who’s seen The King’s Speech, about King George VI and his speech therapist, knows people don’t stutter when they sing. So will singing similarly help Mass-goers with the words of the new missal translation?

Composer Steven Warner says yes. Singing will keep people from slipping back into the familiar words of the old translation. He sings a demonstration of the new “The Lord be with you” and its response, “And with your spirit.”

That is a word-for-word translation of the Latin: “Et cum spiritu tuo,” bringing English-speaking Catholics much closer to their Spanish-speaking fellow parishioners who respond, “Y con tu espíritu.”

No doubt that’s at least part of the reason Spanish-speaking composers seem especially enthusiastic about the changes. “It brings more unity to what we’re doing bilingually,” says Santiago Fernández, who is both a composer and music director of three combined parishes in Pontiac, Michigan. “I think it’s a wonderful opportunity to praise, to come together with the same text. We’re doing this for the right reasons.”

The musical changes are substantial or minor, depending on how they’re counted. While most of the sung portions of the Mass (put to music in various Mass settings) remain the same, three key sections differ: the Holy, Holy, or Sanctus; the Glory to God, or Gloria; and the memorial acclamations. The most popular of those acclamations, “Christ has died, Christ is risen, Christ will come again,” used only in the United States, has been eliminated completely.

Music directors will find help from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, professional organizations, and their dioceses. All three major Catholic music publishers and some individual composers are offering resources to support music ministers with the new music.

Oregon Catholic Press, for instance, sent out a packet to every parish in the country this January. It included a CD of new and revised Mass settings and a booklet with the revised Order of Mass. GIA Publications produced videos of composer David Haas explaining the new Mass settings and offering suggestions. World Library Publications composer Warner, who also leads the folk choir at Notre Dame University, has crisscrossed the country offering workshops for music directors.

All three publishers are offering so many new and revised Mass settings (which can be heard at their websites) that the question has become how to choose from among all the new Mass settings.

Most music directors seem to be going with one new Mass setting and one familiar, revised setting—a common-sense solution considering how attached parishioners are to their music and the fact that most of the sections are unchanged.

Composers, though, are arguing against revising familiar Mass settings. “My concern with the revised Mass settings is if you start out with two measures of what they already knew, then depart from it, you’re manufacturing a train wreck,” says Warner.

Fernández says that as a musician he knows it’s easier to learn a new song from scratch rather than try to relearn an old piece differently. “We should take this opportunity to learn something new and exciting.”

In his role as a member of the Detroit Diocesan Worship Commission, Fernández has created a chart of the new and revised Mass settings for music ministers. It illustrates which settings have more of a traditional feel, which are contemporary, which are arranged for just a choir without accompaniment, and so on.

Michael McMahon, president of the National Association of Pastoral Musicians, urges music directors to begin studying the new and revised Mass settings in order to get to know them. Composer Haas, on that GIA video, suggests music directors at that point call a town meeting, perhaps even with nearby parishes, devoted to singing and learning about the new and revised settings. People can vote for their favorites.

Many parishes are offering classes. McMahon says that the musical changes will raise questions, and it will be up to music directors to have answers. He urges music ministers to focus on the positive, that the new translation will force everyone to pay attention and go back to basics.

Jaime Cortez, a composer and the director of liturgy and music at Holy Cross Church in Mesa, Arizona, sees his role in the upcoming transition as being a catechist. “I’m going to calm people’s fears,” he says. “I’m going to be a voice that will proclaim an opportunity for a better understanding of the liturgy that will deepen faith. I’m going to try to do it as gracefully as possible.”

Enthusiasm aside, the changes will be unsettling. “It will be like getting up in the middle of the night and finding the furniture’s been rearranged,” Warner says. “We’ll need to be patient because we’ll all make mistakes.”

Catholic musicians will overcome the difficulties, McMahon says. “Of all the ministers, musicians tend to be the happiest,” he claims. “Most are can-do people. They know how to make things work.”

Owen Alstott, who composed the popular Heritage Mass (which has been revised to fit the new translations), predicts that this uncomfortable transition will result in churches again being filled with new, beautiful music, composed by all the talented young composers now writing new Mass settings.

So expect to find yourself singing “And with your spirit,” with little worry about slipping back into “And also with you.”

Leaving just one question: Will it also help with “consubstantial”? 

By Kristen Marie Hannum, a writer working in Denver, Colorado and Portland, Oregon. This article appeared in the May 2011 issue of U.S. Catholic magazine (Vol. 76, No. 5, page 16).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Get the headlines straight.

Get the headlines straight. It is not a "new Mass." The current form of Mass, weather you call it the "Novus Ordo," "the Ordinary form of the Roman Rite," "the Missal of Paul VI," "the New Rite, etc" is still the new Mass (ie introduced in 1969/1970). The rite and structure of this form of Holy Mass has not changed, the editio typica of the Latin has not changed, what has changed however, is the translation to be used in the Mass. This does not imply a new order of Holy Mass.

Music for the new Mass

There seems to be an inordinate amount of time and energy being spent on this new Mass traslation and the accompanying music. We would be better off spending the same amount of time and energy ( and money) learning why children are being abused in our Church, why so many Catholics are choosing to leave the Church, why Catholics look to other places rather than to the Church to get their psychological and spiritual needs met.It is as if the pope and the bishops seem to think that this new translation will cure everything that has gone wrong in the Catholic Church. Wake up; it isn't the Mass that needs fixing!

Ah, Helen.

Rather than gathering your information from the New York Times and other anti-Catholic sources, why not try some faithful Catholic sources for your information?

The Catholic Church has looked into the child abuse scandal and has implemented procedures to deal with it. The vast majority of cases coming to light in the media are from decades ago. That doesn't matter to the media, however, who are only glad to present the information as if it happened only yesterday. There is no large organization in the world who has done more in the last several years to protect children than the Catholic Church.

Yes, some people are leaving the Church, but more are coming in. That's why the Church is continuing to grow. It is not shrinking.

Jesus did not found the Church to "meet our psychological needs." He founded the Church to be an instrument of salvation. It is His Mystical Body. Like Him, it has a human nature, and a Divine nature. Because of the Divine nature, it is indefectibly holy. Unlike Him, however, it's human nature is often sinful. And you can begin showing that with the Apostles, one of whom was Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Him. Another, who was St. Peter, who denied Him three times. And the others, except for St. John, who deserted Him like cowards during His passion.

The Eucharist is the source, center, and summit of our faith. The celebration of the Eucharist (the Mass) is where the Eucharist is consecrated and we worship God. Is the celebration of the Mass the place where you think mediocrity is acceptable?

Ah, Steve,

For your information, Jesus did not "found" a church; he was a Jew and never intended to found a new church. he came to teach us how to live. and, by the way, Jesus was a master psychologist because he understood that we are "bio/psycho/social/spiritual" beings and if you read scripture you will see that Jesus always addressed the whole person.

As far as child abuse is concerned, the Philadelphia situation assures us that abuse existed well into the 90's and the bishops are still covering up.

The growth of the church- in the United States the growth is largely due to the infulux of Hispancis. any other organization would want to know why their are so many members leaving for other or no church.
The church is only as holy as its members and many of its leaders are anything but holy.

In my experience, when the Mass is "mediocre" it is because the presider is Mediocre in his celebration of the Mass, in reading the homily, in rushing through the prayers as if he has some other place he would rather be.

Ah, Anonymous, if only you

HAD read the Bible...as a Catholic.

Matt. 16:18 says, "And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church,* and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it."

Or do you think Jesus was joking? Or maybe He really didn't know as much as you think you do?

Jesus didn't write a book. He built a Church to spread His truths. He trained the first members of His Church, the Apostles, and commanded them to go forth and teach all that He had taught them (Matt. 28:20). SOME (but not all) of what was spread orally was written down. We call that the New Testament. But ALL of what He taught was passed on from the Apostles to their successors, the bishops, throughout the centuries. Without an authoritative and authentic interpreter of both Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture, you end up with countless errors, as you have demonstrated. That's why Protestantism continues to splinter into more and more denominations. They have no authentic and authoritative interpreter. We do. It is the Magisterium of the Church.

Jesus's Quotes

And of course Eyewitness News recorded it on tape for all posterity. Somebody writing decades later wrote this quote down based on oral tradition. Who knows what actually was said 2000 years ago, or how the message may have changed over time as it was passed around from community to community. Biblical scholars agree that many of the Jesus's quotes in the Bible are suspect; that is, they are not sure he actually said these words.

The Bible has much wisdom in it, especially the New Testament, but to base everything on what somebody supposedly said to somebody else 2000 years ago is something I am very skeptical of. I have read and studied the Bible and have taken several courses from Catholic Biblical professors at a local Catholic University and find blind interpretation of the Bible unrealistic.

Don, "blind interpretation"

vs. having to reinvent the wheel every time you pick the book up? LOL How's that working for Protestants with their tens of thousands of differing denominations, all founded on someone not "blindly" following the interpretation of the Church who gave it to us in the first place? How's that working out?

I can't believe I just read this.

"There is no large organization in the world who has done more in the last several years to protect children than the Catholic Church."

I think I'm going to throw up.

Well, I think what you're

going to throw up are the "meadow muffins" you have been evidently ingesting from the national (anti-Catholic) media, rather than the facts.

From just one source (among many), here's an except from http://www.catholicleague.org/nytstraighttalk.php:

"A common belief, fostered by the media, is that there is a widespread sexual abuse problem in the Catholic Church today. The evidence is to the contrary: In 2004, the John Jay College of Criminal Justice issued its landmark study and found that most of the abuse occurred during the heyday of the sexual revolution, from the mid-1960s to the mid-1980s. What we are hearing about today are almost all old cases. To wit: from 2005 to 2009, the average number of new credible accusations made against over 40,000 priests was 8.6. This is a tribute to the reform efforts that have taken place: 5 million children and 2 million adults have gone through a safe environment program. Indeed, there is no religious, or secular, institution that can match this record, either in terms of the low rate of abuse or the extensiveness of a training program."

C'mon

Virtually all media is, shall we say, "selective" these days. So called pro-Catholic and anti-Catholic media are BOTH suspect and BOTH can contain truth. BOTH can, by omission or because of a specific agenda, spin the truth toward their own view.

To rely on a single type as the the sole source of "truth" in either case, is to be voluntarily blind to the real truth and actively seek to find evidence for your own personal agenda. Of course the sex abuse scandal is abhorrent and there has undoubtedly been a cover-up of significant magnitude. It is beyond regrettable and has certainly done irreparable harm - even in the eyes of many faithful Catholics, old news or not. That, of course, does not negate the very true fact of the marvelous good the Church does every day - but it does not excuse it either. The devil can site scripture and statistics for his purpose. Usually this is done by taking verifiable facts out of their complete context and/or conveniently ignoring other relevant facts.

In U.S. politics the analogy would be to watch either FOX news or MSNBC exclusively. Neither is is going to give you the complete picture and those who believe either presents the whole truth are fooling themselves. To dismiss either without serious consideration is just as foolish.

I'm not accusing either of you of doing this -- I'm just sayin'! 8)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. Links are not allowed and comments with them will be moderated or deleted. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.