Learn your lines: How parishes are preparing for the new Mass
It’s dress rehearsal time as parishes prepare for the new Mass.
It was last Advent season when Andy Hentz first heard his pastor talk about the new Latin-to-English translations coming to the Mass. But it wasn’t until Hentz, a mail carrier who reads Catholic magazines and listens to Catholic radio, read excerpts of the new texts on the Internet earlier this year that he realized how dramatic the changes will be.
The 33-year-old married father of three says his parish, St. Elizabeth Catholic Church, has not yet done much to prepare parishioners for what is coming. When the new texts are implemented across the nation this fall, Hentz thinks some Catholics could be caught off guard.
“I haven’t heard much about this, considering it’s going to change the central thing that we do as Catholics,” says Hentz of Granite City, Illinois, a St. Louis suburb. “That’s kind of surprising.”
Diocesan and parish officials across the country say they have worked hard to make sure that won’t be the case when the new translations are introduced at Mass on November 27, the first Sunday of Advent. Last year the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops presented the new texts at 22 regional workshops for diocesan and parish leaders. More than 4,200 people participated from all but six dioceses, says Father Richard Hilgartner, associate director of the USCCB’s Secretariat for Divine Worship. Many dioceses that weren’t home sites sent teams of priests, who would return home and lead training sessions in their parishes.
The church has more than ignorance to overcome. Critics charge that the new texts clash too awkwardly with English, and they resent the “top-down” way in which they are coming to American parishes from Rome.
“Many people will at first be concerned about making changes to prayers and responses we know by heart, but the hope is that the new texts will be helpful in leading to a deeper understanding of what we celebrate in the liturgy,” Hilgartner says. “Parishes are being encouraged to plan for catechesis about not only the changes in the texts but the bigger picture—the nature and meaning of the Mass—as well.”
Ready or not
Father Paul Turner, pastor of St. Munchin Parish in Cameron, Missouri, has been giving presentations to a few dozen dioceses in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. He will go to England and Scotland later this year.
“I’ve been trying to respond to requests from dioceses intermittently over the past couple of years, and there is more intense interest now,” Turner says. “I think it’s going well, but I’m finding what you would expect. Some priests are very hesitant about the changes coming, and some are very excited about it.”
Turner says some dioceses have done “quite a lot” to prepare; others have done “quite little by comparison.”
The Archdiocese of Dubuque, Iowa hopes a gradual approach will have its faithful ready by late November. Starting in February it began publishing one-paragraph installments in the Sunday bulletin, describing the reason for the changes and including short excerpts, says Peggy Lovrien, director of Dubuque’s Office of Worship.
The first 15-part series covered the introduction to the Mass and the liturgy of the word. This fall a second 15-part series will focus on the liturgy of the Eucharist and the dismissal.
In February the archdiocese also gathered more than 200 musicians to practice singing the new translations and some new music proposed by Catholic publishers. Early this fall Dubuque plans to reconvene the group.
Lovrien says she has enjoyed working with the musicians. “Through all of this I’m real impressed with the deep love of the church that people have,” she says.
She is not worried that many Catholics will be caught off guard come Advent. “Nothing is perfect in terms of communications,” she notes. “The church, from Rome to the Sunday liturgy in parishes, has been communicating over and over that these changes are coming. If there are those who are surprised by it, I think the numbers will be small.”
Turner says it’s hard to say whether he’s comfortable with the level of preparation thus far. “It’s like asking me as a pastor if I’m comfortable with the level of preparation an engaged couple has received so far before marrying,” he says. “You can never have too much.”
Great divide
Turner has no doubt that the new texts will be implemented on schedule, but some critics say the change will be so unpopular, it should not be forced on Catholics all at once. Father Michael G. Ryan, pastor at St. James Cathedral in Seattle, last year proposed a pilot project “What If We Just Said Wait?” in which the new texts would be introduced in some carefully selected parishes throughout the English-speaking world to be evaluated after a year. Ryan has since discontinued the campaign.
“There is no chance that will happen,” Turner says. “It’s impractical. What would you do [at such a pilot parish] for weddings and funerals when you have a large number of people who have not had the catechesis? And what would you do at the end of that year, go back to the original texts?”
While he disagrees with the critics, Turner likes their passion for the issue. “It’s a sign of how deeply people care about the Eucharist. Behind that is a desire that the people’s voice be heard in some way. It’s a good desire. These changes are going to affect every Catholic in the pews.”
Alexandra Besore, a 25-year-old singer and actress in Los Angeles who attends Mass daily, is among those who are excited about the changes. She says she has grown increasingly frustrated with how area churches have become too “modernized and Protestantized,” citing more tolerance for homosexuality and contraception.
Besore doesn’t necessarily want to revert to an all-Latin Mass but says she is “thrilled” that the “fabulous” new translations will bring a more literal translation of the Mass from the original Latin and a step toward the traditional.
“The closer you get to the original, the closer you get to when Christ was on the Earth, so any move in that direction is a positive thing,” Besore says.
By Jeff Parrott, a reporter at the South Bend Tribune in South Bend, Indiana. This article appeared in the May 2011 issue of U.S. Catholic magazine (Vol. 76, No. 5, pages 12-17).
I will agree with both
By Anonymous (not verified) on Sunday, May 15, 2011I will agree with both Eduardo and Observer.
To change or NOT to change
By Eduardo (not verified) on Sunday, May 15, 2011To illustrate the point of this discussion, what is the Spanish translation for a hot dog? It is NOT as many would guess "un perro caliente", but rather "un hotdog", pronounced "awt-dawg". A "perro caliente" is a dog in heat.
Just as Chevrolet could never sell its NOVA in any Spanish speaking country because NOVA literally means "it doesn't go", literal translations never work. I'm sticking with the current translations.
Excellent point, Eduardo.
By Anonymous (not verified) on Sunday, May 15, 2011Excellent point, Eduardo. Excellent point.
When Logic Fails
By Observer (not verified) on Sunday, May 15, 2011Examples hard hard to argue with. Thanks, Eduardo! This is a succinct and perfect illustration of the real truth surrounding ANY and ALL language translations. To call ANY literal translation 'better' simply because it is more literal is factually delusional.
I'm not sure I get this
By David of Wales (not verified) on Thursday, May 12, 2011I'm not sure I get this "Latin unites the Church" point. Shouldn't Jesus Christ, alive among us in the Body of Christ, unite the church?
Our parish is publishing the official explanations of why various changes were made -- frankly, even my high school kids recognize that the "explanations" don't make sense. It would be a lot more honest if we just said, "this is the way Rome wants it, and Rome is in charge." It's all part of the current ideological campaign to purify the Church, which will make it more Catholic than catholic. In the end, time will tell, as it always does.
The church is a big ship
By Cynthia Leighton (not verified) on Wednesday, May 11, 2011The church is a big ship steering humanity in the same direction. That direction remains the same as does having one person at a time at the steering wheel. Obviously we are never going to be all of one mind on any topic.
I must admit I was upset by comments of others about the changes -- until I attended two presentations about the new Missal. The first was a while ago and it helped me a lot. I do hope that comments don't scare people off from Mass! Advent is our new year, so the timing seems appropriate. Change is never easy!
focus on Latin
By New Jersey Mom (not verified) on Wednesday, May 11, 2011Whether one approves or not, Latin is making a comeback in America's schools and in the Catholic tradition. Latin unified many world Catholics in the days before Vatican II, and Latin also marked Catholics as "non-Protestants." Latin came to have a special place in the hearts of Catholics, many of whom had experienced anti-Catholic sentiments back in the old pre-PC days when anti-Catholic people felt more free to air their bigotry. I myself have studied Latin and am glad so many students are electing it.
At the same time, Latin has no mystical power. When Christ walked among humans, Latin was spoken by those who oppressed Him and His family and friends. The medieval translation of the Bible into Latin is not magical and is not capturing the language of God (I rather think God has mastered all human languages).
As an English teacher, I would have preferred an English translation that used standard American English or British English syntax (rather than Latin syntax), but I'll adjust.
Anti-Catholics still feel
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, May 11, 2011Anti-Catholics still feel free to express their bigotry. Putting down Catholics, indeed Christians in generally, is one of the few remaining prejudices that is still accepted, and in some cases applauded.
I'm confused but I'm pretty
By Barbara (not verified) on Wednesday, May 11, 2011I'm confused but I'm pretty sure Jesus Christ's native language wasn't Latin "original" or otherwise.
Also, The way this has been handled by Rome is a major dissappointment! When is Rome going to listen to the faithful, rather than dictating changes not needed.
Couldn't the cost of this change be better spent on social justice issues?
Barb
"When is Rome going to listen to the faithful?"
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, May 11, 2011Not in our lifetime will they listen to Catholics who disagree with them, maybe never.
Some "orthodox" will point out that Rome does listen to the faithful because faithful Catholics agree with everything that comes from Rome. Anyone who doesn't isn't faithful and doesn't deserve to call themselves Catholic. They are Protestants in Catholic clothing.
I'm one Cradle Catholic who has given up hope of seeing what Good Pope John hoped I would.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. Links are not allowed and comments with them will be moderated or deleted. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.

