Keep the faith
Disease and disaster might challenge our belief in God, but despite all that, we must keep the faith.
One of the most memorable moments of my life was when I conferred the sacrament of confirmation on 20 youths in San Francisco's Children's Hospital-children ranging from 4 or 5 to 16 years of age who were dying from leukemia. I was apprehensive about how these young ones would feel about receiving confirmation.
When I arrived, I found many of the children bald from chemotherapy and radiation, thin and pale, their faces as white as the pillows on which they lay. I imagined they would be resentful, angry at God for letting them die so young. I thought they might be rejecting God.
Did these children have these feelings? No.
As I anointed their foreheads with the chrism, their faces were peaceful, serious, and with a look of awe realizing that they were receiving a gift from God. What faith!
But today, we are told that religious faith is declining in America. Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, and Sam Harris have written best-selling books about atheism. Billboards appear in major cities proclaiming that millions of people are living lives that do not need a God.
We live in a world reliant on science, which on one level is good. Science is not an opponent of religious faith. Science and faith are both part of God's truth. Charles Darwin did not want his discoveries about evolution to diminish faith in God. Albert Einstein believed in a supreme intelligent being. Today popular physicist Stephen Hawking sees God in the laws of the universe. One of the most gifted scientists, Louis Pasteur, once said, "Because I am a scientist, I have the faith of a French peasant; if I continue to study science, someday I may have the faith of a French peasant's wife."
There are many challenges to our religious faith. We puzzle about a merciful God and the suffering of innocent people in the earthquakes of China, Haiti, and Chile. Yet even in their suffering, these victims seem to draw closer to God. Through the tear in broken hearts, God is finally seen. God knows the full answer to the suffering of the innocent. We don't.
And then there is the sexual abuse crisis. This challenges our Catholic faith-and perhaps causes us to lose it. Many of us who are bishops, as leaders in the church, often have been blind, ignorant, and clearly wrong in this crisis. At times we have focused more on the perceived needs of the institutional church than on the needs of the victims. For this we apologize.
I pray that out of this crisis, the church will become better. The church is not the priests and the bishops. The church is the people. And most of all the church is Jesus Christ.
Today, thank God, the church's ordained leadership is involving the laity more and more, bringing together the experience of parents, academics, scientists, the young, and the old to study new structures in the Catholic Church. Already there are signs of maturing, such as the comprehensive, vigorous programs now installed in all dioceses to ensure the protection of youth. Church leadership is also now wisely inviting candidates for priesthood to begin their formal seminary training after high school, after college, or after work experience, rather than during puberty.
I believe we should consider having a new ecumenical council with representatives of the entire church family, always respecting tradition and sacred scripture, studying more deeply the subjects of human sexuality, the healthy exercise of authority in the church, the needs of the poor and the suffering, the appropriateness of celibacy in the priesthood, the role of women in the church, the need for transparency, and the personal holiness of each one of us.
The church is a living organism. Only lifeless things are static and unchanging. Well-thought-out changes may be necessary in times like these.
To strengthen our faith, we should consider the words of author Carlo Carretto, who writes:
How much I must criticize you, my church, and yet how much I love you!
You have made me suffer more than anyone, and yet I owe more to you than to anyone.
I should like to see you destroyed, and yet I need your presence. You have given me much scandal, my church, and yet you alone have made me understand holiness.
Never in this world have I seen anything more compromised, more false, yet never have I touched anything more pure, more generous, or more beautiful.
Countless times I have felt like leaving you, my church; and yet every night I have prayed that I might die in your warm loving arms.
By Bishop Francis A. Quinn, bishop emeritus of Sacramento, California. This article appeared in the August 2010 issue of U.S. Catholic (Vol. 75, No. 8, page 33).
What I hear are words of
By Deacon Bill (not verified) on Monday, September 20, 2010What I hear are words of regret and words of compassion from Bishop Quinn. They are welcome. But it is what I do not hear from him that is troubling. I do not hear words and ideas for changing the power structure of the church. Why is that? Does he still not see that the absolute control of the hierarchy has enabled this scandal to be perpetrated on the laity's children and billions of the laity's dollars being used by the hierarchy to pay for the hierarchy's crimes.
Where, Bishop Quinn, are your words of recognition that the feudal power structure must be reformed? Where are your words of hope that the structure must change to prevent the hierarchy's secrecy from causing the scandals of the future from being covered up? Why can't you bring yourself to publically criticize the current hierarcical structure as needing reform?
If ever there was a time for a retired bishop to speak up publically in criticism of the hierarchy's structure it is now. Not to do so will cause the abuse of more children and the cover up of more scandals.
"Apology"?
By Anonymous (not verified) on Monday, September 13, 2010"For this we apologize."
Are these truly the words from "my Church"? Are these words from the Pope, from Roger Vangheluwe of Belgium, from my parish? The only apology I have heard is that "we are sorry" that the homosexuals in the Church have caused this. As a Gay man, I am offended by the inference that the two are related. I am offended that the remedy is to once again vilify Lesbians and Gays, and to restrict the role of women in the Church. How is restricting the role of women in the Church related to the sexual scandals?
If the Church is made up of the people, then I request, no, demand to sit at the table with the rest of my community. God is everywhere, and the true teachings of Jesus are available to EVERYONE. Until then, my family and I will not be supporting "the Church". Our faith in God will continue with or without "the Church".
As a heterosexual man I
By Deacon Bill (not verified) on Monday, September 20, 2010As a heterosexual man I support your statements critcizing the hierarchy inappropriate and inadequate responses to their abuses of children, especially trying to scapegoat homosexuals as a group. I support your demand for full resposible membership in the church.
I made the decision not to give financial support to the hierarchy's church some time ago. I also am no longer in active ministry because of the hierarchy's corruption. I speak out for reform when and where I can, and I encourage you to associate and fellowship with reform groups either within the Roman church or outside the Roman church. If you choose the latter you can find other catholic churches that are independent of Rome and not so sexually biased.
The only apology I have
By wsxyz (not verified) on Monday, September 13, 2010The only apology I have heard is that "we are sorry" that the homosexuals in the Church have caused this. As a Gay man, I am offended by the inference that the two are related.
You're right. How could anyone possibly think that homosexuality has anything to do with it when a priest seduces a teenage boy?
Just as there are
By Deacon Bill (not verified) on Monday, September 20, 2010Just as there are heterosexual pedophiles who sexually abuse young girls or teenage girls, there are homosexual pedophiles who sexually abuse young boys and teenage boys, but that does not mean all heterosexuals are pedophiles, nor does it mean all homosexuals are pedophiles.
What the public does not know is that the sexual abuse of young children and teenagers is really an abuse of power. Pedophiles of whatever sexual orientation look for isolated troubled children to victimize. The adult perpetrator seduces the child by wooing them with attention, compliments,gifts and treats to gain their trust and friendship. The perpetrators prey on the childs need for affection and use manipulation and coercion to get the child involved in sexual activities. It is an abuse of power of an adult over a child and teenager.
The infamous priest pedophile and papal favorite, Fr. Maciel, used to start physical contact by getting his victims to give him a back rub to "ease his pain." I am a trained professional therapist so I understand how pedophiles operate.
With the reasoning above, we
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, September 15, 2010With the reasoning above, we should purge the Church of priests since they are the ones abusing children.
Some pedophiles are homosexual. Some pedophiles are heterosexual. Not all homosexuals and heterosexuals are pedophiles. Shouldn't we purge the Church of people that abuse children, instead of scapegoating homosexuals?
Laity in the Church
By Rita (not verified) on Friday, September 10, 2010We have been told that the people are the Church not just the bishops and priests. The power and voice and governance is only from the bishops and the Vatican, not the people. The laity have no voice and neither do the nuns. So how does one get one's voice heard without being an outcast? I respect my Church and wish to remain for the spituality, but can there be no honest evaluation and change. Change is hard for the elderly all elderly not just older bishops and Popes. Every organiztion has to do an honest evalution of itself just as we do constanly evauate our lives.
The Vatican II Council
By Deacon Bill (not verified) on Monday, September 20, 2010The Vatican II Council defined the "Church" as those who are baptized. Pope Paul VI refused to let the Council reform the curia and the hierarchy inspite of the Council Fathers desire to do so. (See John W. O'Malley's book, "What happened at Vatican II.") In truth the laity are free to make only 2 decisions in the Roman Church, do I go to this church and do I give any money to it. All other decisions are in the power of the pastor, bishop, and pope. All three have the power of medieval feudal dictators. Sometimes they are benevolent tyrants who listen to the laity, but they are always free to ignore the laity, or only listen to the laity who defend the absolute power of the ordained. Lies are repeated like this is "your parish." This is not true because the deed to all church property is exclusively in the bishop's name and he canclose a parish and sell it at any time for any reason. Another "lie" is that "there is no democrcy in the church and there never has been."Bishops had traditionally been elected by the local community. Popes did not start naming bishops outside the papal states until after 1820. John Carroll, the first American bishop was elected by the priests in America and American parishes were "owned and controlled" by the laity through the "trustee system."Lay reform groups like Voice of the Faithful and the American Catholic Council are trying to change the governing strucures of the church.


