Logo

Where do we get the Marian dogmas?

Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Where do we get the Marian dogmas?
ShareThis
Although the Roman Catholic dogmas of the Immaculate Conception and Assumption of Mary are relatively new (1854 and 1950, respectively), the pious attitudes that generated these promulgations are ancient.

Scholars of early Christianity are in agreement that interest in the mother of Jesus was mostly initiated by the need to clarify the church’s teachings about the nature of Christ, his relationship with God, and the salvation Christ accomplished. Through Mary the fullness of Christ’s genuine humanity was guaranteed, in opposition to those who argued that Jesus only appeared to be human.

As christology continued to develop, new insights were drawn from St. Paul’s understanding of Christ as the New Adam who completes and perfects creation (1 Cor. 15). A natural correlation was seen between Jesus and Mary, with the latter being understood as the New Eve by second-century theologians like St. Justin Martyr and St. Irenaeus of Lyons. While some early teachers understood Mary as less than perfect, even arguing that she could be ambitious and doubtful, others argued for her sanctification or consecration to God even prior to her birth. Similar ideas abounded for St. John the Baptist, whose conception was celebrated as a feast even before that of Mary.

Doctrinal development in the West, supported by pious fervor, eventually led to Mary’s conception being promulgated as “immaculate” by Pope Pius IX in 1854. The intention was to signify that she had been preserved from all stain of sin (the Latin word for stain being macula) by a unique and singular act of God, based upon the redemptive merits of Christ’s future. In the Roman Catholic Church, the liturgical feast of Mary’s conception, celebrated on December 8th, became the celebration of her “immaculate conception.” Mary is considered sinless in the Orthodox Church as well, though her conception is not described as immaculate because of Eastern hesitancy concerning Western ideas about original sin.

The belief in Mary’s assumption into heaven probably evolved from the tendency in early Christianity to describe her life in ways similar to that of her son. By the fifth century the end of her life was celebrated in various places in a feast of her dormition, or “falling asleep.” In an interesting parallel to Jesus, Thomas the apostle doubts her passing until seeing her empty tomb, from which she has been assumed into glory. Eastern Christans tend to think of her assumption as occurring after her passing, while Western Christians usually understand her passing and assumption as a unified reality.

In 1950 the dogma of the Assumption was declared by Pope Pius XII as a singular gift to Mary and as an anticipation of the general resurrection of believers. Perhaps it is best understood as a dogma of hope extended to all Christians who strive to be faithful to Christ and who embrace his resurrection as their own. The final chapter of Lumen Gentium describes Mary as the most faithful disciple of Jesus. By extension, her fate represents our own longing for life without end.

This article appeared in the August 2010 issue of U.S. Catholic (Vol. 75, No. 8, page 46).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

But what's interesting is the

But what's interesting is the more recent phenomenological explorations. For example asking people who've had a loved one die whether or not they've experienced his/her "presence" - a felt sensibility. And surprisingly a large number acknowledge this experience.

Then the interesting discussions around the inexplicable lack of decay of corpses long dead like Br./ Fr? Solanus Casey of Detroit. Or the testimonies of a perfume-type scent emitted from bodies of people like John XXIII after his death.

And then one takes it a step further - how to explain the phenomena of Guadalupe in 1635, Fatima, etc. And here I give deference to the necessity of discernment distinguishing psycho-spiritual disorder from authentic experiences.

Lastly, if one accepts these phenomena - then why not acknowledge the possibility of something like the Assumption?

Discussion on Mary and the Saints

A Lutheran - Catholic discussion was held in 1990 by academics from both church bodies. They came to some startling realizations as to the agreements they both shared. They discovered 19 convergences, and only 4 divergences, none-the-less, these divergences were formidable. The unfortunate part of this discussion is that it is virtually unheard of among most Catholics and Lutherans, as it goes a long way in clearing up many mis-understandings and misconceptions about each other. Sadly, there was little or no follow-up on these documents issued by each church body.

Check: http://www.lcms.org/graphics/assets/media/CTCR/mediate.pdf to find the Lutheran response to this dialogue. Though it had no official sanctification, being done by academics not Bishops/Presidents etc. This is a document that every Catholic and Lutheran should study.

Another excellent book on Mary and the Saints is "Mary for Evangelicals" by Tim Perry ISBN-10 0-8308-2569-X. This identifies some Protestant concerns, but also points out the neglect of Mary by Protestants.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.