Logo

When did we start celebrating Mass in Latin?

Friday, June 18, 2010
When did we start celebrating Mass in Latin?
ShareThis
The instinct of Christianity has always been that people should worship in a language they understand.

The first language of Christian liturgy was Aramaic, the common language of the first Christians, who were Palestinian Jews. While Hebrew was the language of scripture and formal worship, Christian worship occurred in the home where Aramaic was spoken. The words Abba and maranatha are Aramaic.

Christianity quickly spread from Palestine to the rest of the world, and the Eucharist came to be celebrated in many languages, including Syriac, Coptic, and Armenian. In most of the Mediterranean world, the common language was Greek, which became the language of liturgy in that region and remained so until the early third century.

Eucharist itself is a Greek word, meaning thanksgiving. The phrase Kyrie eleison and the words liturgy, baptism, evangelize, martyr, and catechumen, among other familiar church words, are also Greek in origin.

From around the third century B.C., what we call “classical” Latin was the language of the Roman aristocracy and the educated classes. Around the time Jesus was born, during the reign of Augustus Caesar, the language began to change. The Roman aristocracy was destroyed by war and political infighting; when they disappeared, their language went with them. Classical Latin was replaced by a less refined version of the language.

In the third and fourth centuries A.D. this form of Latin began to replace Greek as the common language of the Roman world and soon became the language of the liturgy.

Exactly how this change in the liturgy came about is uncertain. In the early church the liturgy was led extemporaneously by the bishop, according to a pattern. There were written examples of Eucharistic Prayers, but they were models, not prescribed prayers. The last such document in Greek was written around the year 215. By the sixth century, the Roman Canon (which is still in use, also called Eucharistic Prayer I) appears, completely in Latin and prescribed for use exactly as written.

What happened during those centuries? It seems that a core of the Roman Canon was developed and used first, probably even in liturgies that were partly in Greek and partly in Latin, until the final Latin version evolved. Because Christians had not used Latin for worship prior to this, words had to be adapted or imported (often from Greek) to express Christian ideas, beginning the development of an ecclesiastical form of Latin. There is also evidence that the Roman Canon was influenced by prayers from the Eastern churches.

Even though Latin evolved into various modern languages, Latin remained the sole language of the Roman Rite until the Second Vatican Council returned to the original instinct of Christianity that people should worship in a language they understand. 

By Victoria M. Tufano, director of liturgy at Ascension Parish in Oak Park, Illinois. This article appeared in the July 2010 issue of U.S. Catholic (Vol. 75, No. 7, page 46).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"Congregationalists" is the

"Congregationalists" is the word the Church today is using to power up its roll out of the New Missal. It reminds us that the Church does not use democratic principles in what it teaches, or in the way it teaches: we are to have a New Missal because we are being sent one, and there is nothing that will change that fact. To say we are not congregationalists to defend procedures such as this, makes the word negative and pejorative, and also links it with non-Catholic churches, i.e., Congregationalists. A simple word use not only makes dissenters sound like non-Catholics, but also takes attention away from the actual word, "community,” that should be used when addressing the Catholic People of God in this country. To fail to use it also fails to bring up the all the words connected with community: communication, communitarian, common good, communion, and Eucharist.

Discussion with those who think differently than those who promulgate policy and procedure within Church is not tolerated, Tridentine folk excepted apparently. Galileo met this haughty savagery first hand. See also what happened concerning Sr. Elizabeth A. Johnson's book, Quest for the Living God: Mapping Frontiers in the Theology of God. Fr. Thomas G. Weinandy, executive director of the Secretariat for Doctrine stated, [with respect to the bishops’ failure to meet with Sr. Elizabeth Johnson after banning her book, Quest for the Living God: Mapping Frontiers in the Theology of God], "The bishops felt that would just prolong a process they really didn't want to prolong."

In other words, there is nothing that can be said about an issue but what the bishops themselves say, and except to repeat what they say themselves, one is persona non grata. It is especially sad because women are the most abused in these methodologies and ideologies. Whether they speak or remain silent, they are given no voice and are treated as non-persons, a terrible and ugly dysfunction.

mass attendance

Could attendance be dropping off b/c more people are in jobs that require them to work on Sunday? I'm not only talking about people who work in the health care industry. There was a time when there were good jobs that had their people only work during the week. These jobs also paid a decent buck. Sad part is that if you don't work on Sunday, they'll find someone who will and you will not be able to feed your kids.

That's the biggest reason for me

I work a retail job that requires Saturday and Sunday work. I get out of work too late on Saturday for a Vigil Mass and too late Sunday for the latest one. The only Sunday mass I can get to is 6:30 on Sunday and I'm too lazy for that. After getting home at 10:00 Saturday night I guess I'm not good enough to get up at 5:30. My store is open every day of the year except Christmas. A manager told me that it's only a matter of time before we'll have to work Christmas too, that all stores will be open 365 days a year. Last year all our employees were required to work on Thanksgiving. No requests for time off were accepted. Pretty soon it will be the same for Christmas. If Catholics have a problem with this they should speak up about it but conservative Republican Catholics won't because they don't want to put any restrictions on businesses. Blue laws weren't all bad. Since businesses everywhere opened on Sundays employees are required to work on Sundays. If you have to work on Saturday too it makes getting to mass difficult.

WHEN DID WE START CELEBRATING MASS IN LATIN

THEY SAY that people under stress want to return to the safety of the past, so with the desire to return to the Latin mass. The mass gradually changed to Latin as the Roman see became politically more powerful. Latin became a sign of political power and European unity. Thank Charlemagne for his proliferation of the Roman liturgical books which were in Latin.

It seems that many who post

It seems that many who post to this site want the Latin Mass back for them It is available, so to each their own. I never went or heard a mass in Latin, but it is worship of God. As we give permission for people to worship in that form, we should also provide the option of those who want to worship in the contemporary language when the new translations arrive. As one preface states, "our acts of worship add nothing to your greatness, but help us grow in your grace."

By the way, mass attendance is down due to many factors people. Perhaps one reason is that we have had 31 years of conservative rule. Contrast attendance between 1965 and 1979 (it is down), and between 1979 and today (way down).

31 years of Orthodox Rule?

I am a convert to the faith (1998) and have worked for the Church for 8+ years. This issue is of great interest to me and my work. Actually, your dates prove the opposite of your assertion that attendance is down due to 31 years of conservative (political term) rule. In reality, the heterodox ("liberal") Catholics changed everything after Vatican II and took over much of the control of the U.S. Catholic Church through political and cultural pressures to acquiesce to, mainly, the sexual revolution. If you research the growing seminars and diocese across the U.S., you will find that it is in fact the more orthodox that are increasing vocations and have thriving parishes. There was an excellent book written a number of years ago by Colleen Carroll (a Catholic herself, but the book crosses denominational lines) called The New Faithful that may give some insight into this phenomenon. It actually makes sense that people would be more drawn to authentic Catholic Truth, as they can barely tell the difference between watered-down Catholicism and most Protestant denominations. Plus, I highly doubt the majority of Catholics would disagree with the fact that the overall circumstances of vocations and moral life have improved since the changes implemented in the U.S. after Vatican II. Especially, since the council was primarily pastoral in nature and should have had little to do with liturgical changes that were made. God bless.

"It seems that SOME who

"It seems that SOME who post. I agree with everything else you said, especially about the reasons mass attendence dropped. Don't be fooled by the medievalists who love the Latin mass. I grew up with the old Latin mass. Much of the mass was completely silent. The only time we had a Latin singing choir was one "high" mass on Christmas and one "high" mass on Easter. The people in the pews the rest of the year prayed their rosaries in silence because the people were not allowed to pray out loud. Imagine yourself going to a lecture in Chinese every week for an hour on Sunday, only the speaker kept his back to you the entire time he was praying and you could not hear what he was saying because he was only speaking to the crucifix on the far wall. That is what it was like. Even when new missals were printed so the Latin was on one side and the English was on the facing page, it was silent. None of the other people there with you understand Chinese either. You have to bring your 5 little kids and teach them to endure the silence. The only time the priest spoke English was when he gave his sermon which was not on scripture, but on other topics like the difference between venial sin and mortal sin, or the vices of alcohol.Of course only the priests were holy enough to "say" mass. That was what the Latin mass was. The ones who are clammering for it now don't know that.

Excellent

That's exactly how it was. I remember it the same way. My 73 year-old aunt is as devout as they come, never misses mass and sings in her parish choir. She was telling me about some of the other old ladies clucking about how much better it was in the old days until one of them said, "We didn't know what was going on, we just sat there with our rosaries". Some "orthodox" will say now that they shouldn't have done that but they were never told not to "in the day", it was standard practice. I remember being one of those kids with itchy dress pants sitting there not having a clue what was going on and waiting for it to be over so we could get donuts. I remember being older reading along in my missal never being sure if I was where the priest was. I only got something out of it when I became an altar boy and could get up on the altar and be part of it. The rest of the time it was just as you describe. I'll probably go to a Tridentine Mass someday just for old time's sake but no way do I want to go back to it.

Different experience

I am 77 so attened the same "old days" masses. I guess I had never thought back then that some people could not understand, especially once the missal was also in English.

The church/school I attended on the south side of Chicago, taught the Latin responses to the kids once we reached 5th grade. We were also taught what that meant. At that age, I didn't think that some people could not read no matter what language was in the missal. I still love the sound of the Latin Mass although I am glad of the decision to say Mass in the language people understood.

A funny, once day in church, I realized that when the priest was saying, "Ite Missa est" and we were responding, "Deo Gratias" that he was saying, "Go the mass is over and we were responding, "Thanks be to God". Of course to a ten year old that was funny. The nun drug me out to the vestible and asked me if I wanted to share what I felt was funny. Of course, I didn't.

Those who Post

Church attendance is not down because of conservatism. It is because of our secular society that promotes "if it feels good do it and if i'm ok you're ok." Many American Catholics whcih is a minority in the Universal Church to follow their beliefs or ideas (priestly celibacy, abortion and women ordination )which has caused scandals in the American Church and now attempts to do the same around the world. The church's job is to get us to heaven by asking us to follow the word of Jesus and church teaching and sacred tradition.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. Links are not allowed and comments with them will be moderated or deleted. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.