Certifiably Catholic
Our place in the church isn't determined by politics or policy.
If there's one lesson Americans can take from the last 12 months of our political life, it's that something called "bipartisanship" is long dead and buried. If the recent national debate on health care is an indication, anyone "reaching across the aisle" is most likely trying to punch the person in the opposite chair.
Bipartisanship among Catholics took a few hits as well, as Catholic groups beginning with the U.S. bishops' conference struggled to stake out a Catholic position on the issue, with federal funding for abortion being the sticking point (along with a minor nod to the fact that neither political party supported access to health care for undocumented immigrants).
Enter Deal Hudson, who lobbied Catholics for the GOP in the 2004 election and now blogs at InsideCatholic.com. Hudson argued that Catholic politicians must reject any health care legislation that would direct further public funds to abortion because it would directly implicate Catholic taxpayers in abortions. Any Catholic organizations that disagreed, in Hudson's mind, were "fake Catholic" groups, and he pointed directly to two, Catholics United and Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, both of which generally supported the Democrats' health care legislation. One was left to wonder if Catholics in those groups were themselves "fake" Catholics.
Here's where "big tent" Catholics should start to worry: It is one thing for Catholics to disagree about how church teaching should apply to civic and political life, and Catholics throughout history have been imperialists, monarchists, feudalists, divine-right-ists, socialists, communists, fascists, anarchists, Whigs, Tories, and, in our own country, Republicans and Democrats. Each group has likely argued that if you're a Catholic you should be (enter political party), through which you should support (enter public policy), to the exclusion of all others.
But it is something else altogether to rhetorically kick one's sisters and brothers out of the church, and that is what many Catholics seem all too willing to do. We have become familiar with the acronym "RINO" (Republican in Name Only); unfortunately its Catholic analogs are appearing as well, especially online.
But here's the rub: No Catholic, not even the pope, gets to determine whether someone is a Catholic. Even excommunication does not "un-Catholic" a person; it merely restricts a member's participation in our sacramental life.
Our Catholic identity is rooted not in a political ideology, a policy position, or a social affiliation. It is created by one thing only: our common initiation-the Baptism that creates us as God's people, the Confirmation that seals the grace of Baptism, and the Eucharist that deepens our communion as the Body of Christ. Finding our Catholic identity in anything else, even positions on certain moral problems sometimes referred to as "non-negotiables"-an expression that does not appear in official church teaching-is less than Catholic and at worst sectarian. It is true that Catholics will affiliate to pursue some goal, and there are Catholics who lobby for policies such as universal health care and Catholics who pursue free-market solutions to social problems. There are Catholics who lobby for prison reform, for an end to the death penalty, and for school vouchers.
We can debate which groups best exemplify our Catholic tradition-and tempers may flare-but what none of us can do is exclude those on the other side from the church. Charity further demands that we presume each other's good will.
In most parishes Lent is marked by the initiation of adults into the church. The RCIA, the ritual roadmap through which they enter, has as one of its high points the Rite of Election, when those to be baptized are enrolled as members of the church at the diocesan cathedral.
Having passed through a time of discernment, they have explored scripture and become acquainted with the Catholic faith. But there are no orthodoxy exams, no questions about political affiliation, no litmus tests for membership save the desire to be baptized and to live as a disciple of Christ.
With entrance requirements like these, we're not likely to achieve political or any other kind of uniformity, nor should we expect it. This flexibility is part of the genius of Catholicism, for it allows one body to hold a great richness in spirituality, devotion, practice-even politics. There are issues that may separate us, but finally no ideological aisle should divide the graced unity we have in Christ's body.
Bryan Cones is the managing editor of U.S. Catholic. This article appeared in the March 2010 issue of U.S. Catholic (Vol. 75 no. 3, page 9).
Thank You!
By Maureen (not verified) on Tuesday, March 16, 2010As the intensity of the debates on Health Care and abortion ratch up, it's nice to hear a voice for moderation.
The Catholic Church has wonderful teachings and documents on a variety of issues. However when the faithful try to pull on one thread for an issue, they ruin and distort the fabric of the teaching as a whole.
While the Catholic Church calls us strongly to realize our ideals. Sometimes, I feel that the good is sacrificed for the perfect. I think the health care debate is a classic example of this. Is the bill perfect and everything the Church could want? No. However, it will help millions of people live better quality lives.
In some ways, it's like the story of the boy walking along a beach filled with starfish and picking them up one by one and tossing them back into the sea, so they don't die from drying out. A man comes along and asks him, "Why bother? What difference will it make?" "It makes a difference for this one." replies the boy as he tosses another starfish back.
Because we cannot achieve the perfect Kingdom of God on earth, does not mean we should not do what we can to make it a reality.
Reply to Certifiably Catholic Part 1
By David Phillips (not verified) on Monday, February 22, 2010There are some aspects in which I agree (and disagree) with Bryan, and I'd like to respectfully make some points.
The Catholic Church has no preferred form of government as Bryan points out. Catholics can live in and participate in States/societies of various kinds (dictatorships, monarchies, popularly-elected governments, etc). [However, I don't think one could be a good Catholic and a good Communist.]
The Church does have official teachings about the human person and society, and the Church should take an active role in society. But the Church should not take official stands on, for example, the concept of government-provided universal health care. Whether one supports "universal health care"-- or one's views on how to solve environmental problems, etc. --do not determine one's orthodoxy or if one is Catholic or not.
What is most important is that as a Catholic, one is sincerely seeking the truth regarding such issues.
Where do you draw the line?
By Jim (not verified) on Monday, February 22, 2010"The Church does have official teachings about the human person and society, and the Church should take an active role in society. But the Church should not take official stands on..."
If I'm understanding you correctly, you believe that the Church should advocate for the idea of human dignity, but shouldn't stick its neck out and advocate on behalf of specific policies? Are you suggesting a bright line-no direct Church involvement in policy debates, or a murky line-maybe in some areas, but not in others, kind of depends? And, if you pick and choose, how do you argue with someone who makes different choices?
Myself, I'd argue for the bright line-no policy involvement at all, and allow the holy spirit to do his job of working on the consciences of our political leaders. It is better for the Church to be an outsider, than to be an inside player.
Reply to Jim on drawing the line...
By David Phillips (not verified) on Monday, February 22, 2010I think the Church should stick its neck out with propositions such as "The genocide of a certain people is wrong" or "Immigrants have dignity and should be respected" or even "we should try to improve people's access to health care."
I am saying that it is wrong and inappropriate for Church leaders to officially say "Vote for John Conyers" or "Vote for Margaret Thatcher."
It is posssible for two orthodox Catholics to disagree over how to best solve a complex social ill, and still be orthodox in their Faith. It's hard to draw a line, because every situation is different. Two Catholic scientists could disagree about things not yet resolved, such as questions about outer space...neither would be compromising their Faith.
Church and State are two distinct entities. But this doesn't mean the Church should hide in a cave from the real world. The Church is in the world (though not of it). The Church is actually superior to the State... but should not attempt to be the State.
I agree with that, David
By Jim (not verified) on Monday, February 22, 2010It sounds like you're saying the Church should state general principles and let the secular authorities get the nitty gritty details? I can go along with that.
Reply to Certifiably Catholic Part 2
By David Phillips (not verified) on Monday, February 22, 2010It is true that there has a concept known as "once a Catholic, always a Catholic", even regarding excommunicated persons!... although if one deliberately chooses to formally apostasize, I don't think this concept would hold.
But when it comes to articles of Faith, there are certain truths to which one must assent in order to be Catholic. (It is possible that one might falter from a certain truth in good conscience or ignorance, without losing the Faith.) What is scary is that today, "unity" and "inclusiveness" are sought at all costs, even at the expense of Divine Truth! Unity at all costs is a mistake.
Recently, I gave a link to the Oath against Modernism that all clergy were required to take. But even more important is the profession of the Catholic Faith. Please read this carefully. One MUST believe all of this to be a good Catholic. Those who no longer believe in the following's contents really have LOST THE FAITH, sad and hearbreaking as it is to say! I say this objectively, without judging individuals. PLEASE CLICK THE LINK AND READ THIS CAREFULLY; OUR PRIESTS ONCE SWORE TO THIS IN A SACRED OATH...HOW MANY STILL ASSENT TO WHAT IT SAYS???
http://www.sspxthepriesthood.com/holy-orders%20pius%20iv.shtml
Is the society of saint piux x back in the Church?
By Jim (not verified) on Monday, February 22, 2010I can't remember if B16 negotiated with them, or what the status was-are they back in communion with Rome?
Reply to Jim on sspx
By David Phillips (not verified) on Monday, February 22, 2010Benedict XVI lifted the "excommunications" against the 4 bishops ordained by Msgr. Lefebvre. There are still discussions going on between Rome and SSPX....
I know the above link was from SSPX's website. I didn't want to use it, because I didn't want to argue for or against SSPX here....but I couldn't find a more "neutral" link on the internet to the contents of the Catholic Profession of Faith that priests swore to at ordination.
Nicene Creed
By JimB (not verified) on Monday, February 22, 2010"We believe in one baptism"
I don't think it is possible to "un baptize"- I don't know for sure because it's hard to prove a negative, but my personal understanding is that it isn't.
"for the forgiveness of sins."
For those of us-me first and foremost-dependent on the mercy of God-it's a source of comfort to believe that, if in the absolute last instant of life someone begs for Gods mercy, that He could possibly grant it.
btw, how do you get the fancy fonts in your posts?
You're right JimB about baptism and mercy
By David Phillips (not verified) on Monday, February 22, 2010You're right JimB...Baptism leaves an indelible seal upon the soul. No one can be "un-baptized."
Yes, you're also right- the Church teaches us that anyone, even in the last instant of life, who asks forgiveness from God with perfect contrition will be forgiven.
As far as the fonts... well, I raise my power sword in the air and say "I have the power"... no, just kidding...if you use the "I" at the bottom of the comments you get the red. (Sorry to let the secret out Bryan- lol)


