Incoming Missal
Get ready for changes to your Sunday Mass.
When Father Jeff Keyes arrived at St. Edward's Parish in the summer of 2004, he found a thriving, multiethnic parish of 5,400 families on the eastern side of the San Francisco Bay. Keyes' religious order, the Missionaries of the Precious Blood, had sent him to become pastor of one of the order's two remaining parishes in California.
While pleased with many aspects of his new assignment, there were certain things that bothered him. Passionate about the liturgy, Keyes felt that the parish's approach to the celebration of the Eucharist conveyed a somewhat casual attitude toward this central mystery of the Christian faith.
It was an accumulation of small things, notes Keyes, who recalls, for example, that the parish was using a loose-leaf lectionary rather than a bound copy. Keyes was troubled by the idea of having a "throwaway Word of God," as he puts it.
A trained musician with a number of published compositions to his credit, Keyes was particularly disturbed by the parish's musical repertoire. At his first Mass, for example, the choir sang "Gather Us In," whose third verse begins, "Not in the dark of buildings confining, not in some heaven light years away." Keyes was frustrated that a Catholic hymn would appear to dismiss our desire for heaven. "I said to people at the parish, ‘That's not what we believe!' " says Keyes.
In the months after he became pastor, Keyes set about making changes. Many were small, such as the decision to purchase real candles for Advent rather than the plastic oil lamp candles that had been used previously. "The point of an Advent wreath is to mark the passage of time," says Keyes. "You need real candles to do that." Keyes also found craftsmen within the parish who refurbished the ambo, baptismal font, and tabernacle.
It was Keyes' decision to radically reshape the parish's music program, however, that generated the most controversy. Keyes essentially banned the use of a number of popular contemporary hymns, particularly "praise and worship" songs with lyrics that sometimes reflect a Protestant theology. "They are not appropriate for a Catholic Mass," says Keyes.
His most striking innovation was to transform the parish's 10 a.m. service into a "sung Mass," with many parts being sung in Latin using Gregorian chant. Keyes favors using the chants from the Graduale Romanum and the Graduale Simplex-the two official chant books for the Mass-even though few parishes make use of them because of the complexity of the music.
The first few months were difficult. The original choir of almost 30 voices dwindled to a small handful. A number of families left the parish. Some parishioners accused him of wanting to return to a pre-Vatican II liturgy. The charge is ironic, says Keyes, because the Second Vatican Council's Sancrosanctum Concilium (Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy) specifically envisioned Catholics learning to sing the key parts of the Mass in Latin.
Not everyone was displeased with the new direction, however. After his first Christmas Mass at St. Edward's, one older parishioner came up and said, "Thank you for giving us our church back." A woman who now drives 20 miles to attend the 10 a.m. Mass every Sunday wrote Keyes a three-page letter thanking him for providing a "dignified, prayerful, and truly artistic celebration" of the Mass.
A visitor to St. Edward's 10 a.m. Mass finds an intriguing mix of old and new. Much of the "ordinary" of the Mass-the parts that recur from week to week, including the Kyrie, Gloria, Sanctus, and Agnus Dei-is chanted in Latin, as are the "propers," that is, the antiphons that are used for a particular Mass at the entrance, offertory, and Communion processions. The readings and homily and most (but not all) of the congregational responses are in English, as is the Eucharistic Prayer, which Keyes chants from beginning to end. Although Keyes has worked to teach parishioners the basics of chant, the congregation still tends to drop out on some of the more complex pieces.
Donalyn Deeds has been a parishioner at St. Edward's for more than 30 years and currently serves as the parish's director of religious education. She considers Keyes a friend as well as a boss and has not hesitated to challenge him on some of his changes. "I think we moved too abruptly," she says. "This parish had been doing contemporary music for such a long time. It's what people were used to."
Deeds concedes, though, that Keyes may have brought a much-needed sense of reverence back into the liturgy. "There is a lack of formality that is pervasive throughout our entire culture. People show up for Mass late and they leave early. They come in T-shirts and jeans. I think Father Jeff may have brought some needed discipline."
Although some of his parishioners see him as a conservative, Keyes resists the label. "When I preach about immigration, people think I'm a liberal. When I seek to do what the church asks when we celebrate the liturgy, people think I'm a conservative. All I seek to be is Roman Catholic," he says.
This article appeared in the August 2009 (Vol. 74, No 8, page 12) of U.S. Catholic.
Comments (96)
Beauty and reverence
By Exasperated (not verified) on Thursday, March 11, 2010A cradle Catholic who received 16 years of Catholic education, including four years of Latin, and three years in a parish boys choir, singing Latin, I was overjoyed when the Mass was changed to the vernacular. I also enjoyed singing in English. I can remember watching President Kennedy's funeral Mass on a B&W TV and feeling sorry for Cardinal Cushing who shouldn't have been singing the Mass.
Remember one Latin phrase: de gustibus non est diputandum. "Matters of taste are not disputable." Remember, like beauty, reverence is in the eye or the ear of the beholder.
The early Church celebrated
By Anonymous (not verified) on Sunday, February 14, 2010The early Church celebrated their liturgy in the vernacular. Latin was chosen as the language of the liturgy not because it was a more holy language than other languages but because Latin was the vernacular of the general people in the western part of the Roman Empire in the first few centuries AD. How can one say amen to things uttered in a language that one does not understand? If we say amen to things that we do not understand, we are either lying or turning the mass into an insincere pure ritual.
The native tongue of Jesus was Aramaic. The lingua franca of the eastern part of the Roman Empire including Palestine during Jesus' time was Greek and not Latin. There was no reason for Jesus to speak Latin.
Latin / reply to Anonymous
By Eminem Relapse ... on Monday, February 15, 2010The Protestant opinion expressed by Anonymous in the comment above has been explicitly condemned, infallibly, by the Council of Trent... (and this teaching of the Magisterium has also been repeated by numerous popes.... and even by Vatican Council II !)
This Protestant notion (that Latin should be entirely dropped from the Roman Rite Liturgy) is a grave error that cannot be reconciled with Catholicism.
What is beyond disturbing is that a large number, if not the majority, of those today who consider themselves "Catholics" actually profess this Protestant error.
PLEASE NOTE: This is not a matter of David Phillips' (or anyone else's) thoughts or opinions vs. someone else's thoughts or opinion. This is not a matter of whether a Latin Mass appeals or relates to one person and not to another. This is a matter of the Church's sacred teaching.
"The day the Church abandons her universal tongue is the day before she returns to the catacombs." - Pope Pius XII
Liturgy
By MNS (not verified) on Sunday, November 22, 2009The word liturgy means: Work of the People. It seems as if the author of the article thinks the word should be translated instead as Clergy's Work.
This is a fundamental error. The People not the Clergy decide how to worship God. This means Laity select the book of prayer, music, architectural style, vestments, etc. The top down imposition of magic and mystery is an insult both to the faith and to followers by the Holy See. Tradition is not what faith in Christ is about. Let's have less of the lace, gold, incense and candles, and more honest charismatic prayer. Dump the Latin Mass! Let's have a Second Council of Constance and toss Ratzinger out.
Another reply to MNS
By Anonymous (not verified) on Monday, February 15, 2010I am a Protestant going through RCIA. MNS sounds like s/he would be more comfortable in Protestant worship. May I humbly (with no sarcasm intended or meant) suggest you worship at a protestant church instead of trying to change the RCC worship style.
Dump the lace, gold, incense and Latin and you have Calvinism! You may not fully appreciate the richness and history of the RCC if you grew up in it, but to me whenever I hear the few latin phrases used in Mass at my church I am reminded of the link back through the centuries. The gold, incense & candles remind me of who I am truly worshipping: the King of the universe who is worthy of of being glorified and honored.
Magic and mystery? I agree with you that there is mystery, but no magic. Hoc est corpus meum but not hocus pocus. Protestantism is watered down Catholicism.
I hope you will find the Protestant style worship you seek, but outside of the RCC.
Reply to MNS
By Eminem Relapse ... on Monday, November 23, 2009If the Laity can select all of these things (book of prayer, vestments, etc), therefore selecting HOW they will worship God, then why not let them ALSO select WHAT they believe about the God they are worshipping? Why not let the laity in each parish determine which books they consider Scripture, which dogmas of the Faith they believe in, etc?
MNS, I say this not in a resentful tone: I cannot conceive of a more Protestant ethos than your comment. I honestly don't think that I belong to the same religion as you do.
Dump the Latin Mass? Such a notion was already explicitly condemned and anathemized by the Council of Trent. The future of the Church lies in its Tradition.
Tradition has EVERYTHING to do with what the Faith is about. All of the rites of the Catholic Church (Eastern and Western) originate in the Apostles and are part of the Tradition handed down.
"Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle." 2 Thess 2:14
Jesus did not speak Latin
By newtaste (not verified) on Tuesday, September 29, 2009Jesus did not speak Latin and He did not sing Gregorian chants. And, the Catholic Church really is going backwards by implementing prayers that are written in poorly constructed English. You don't translate word-for-word - that is not how translations work.
Jesus did speak Latin and still does
By Disciple (not verified) on Monday, January 25, 2010Actually Jesus spoke Latin, Greek, Aramaic and all other languages and still does...but this misses the point. In addition Jesus did not have anywhere to rest his head, so are you saying we should do things as Jesus did or only those things which he did do? The Holy Spirit leads the Church and those who love Him do as He leads, those who do not hear reject Him, and do not hear but reject the Father and the Son as well (cf. Luke 10:16)
A quick study and research of the history of Jewish Synagogue rites and Rabbi scholars discovers that Jesus, Mary and Joseph and all Jews did sing 'Gregorian" Chant, that is, what is the root and essence of this. The Holy Father, Gregory I, simply codified, etcetera, the sacred music chants ancient to the People of God - so, we can say Jesus sang "gregorian chant"...and the People of God are to be doing the same - just open up to what the Holy Spirit actually directed at Vatican II and following....
On whose and what authority do you speak on how translation is done? Certainly, the Holy Spirit has spoken on this - most recently Liturgiam authenticam. The Lord gave His Spouse, the Church, this divine authority.
check out this article:
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0540.html...
blessings in Jesus Christ
Agree
By certificate on Monday, November 9, 2009I agree, although this is the least of the problems with the Catholic church. They really need to open up preisthood to women and also allow them to marry. It has to be done.
