Incoming Missal
Get ready for changes to your Sunday Mass.
When Father Jeff Keyes arrived at St. Edward's Parish in the summer of 2004, he found a thriving, multiethnic parish of 5,400 families on the eastern side of the San Francisco Bay. Keyes' religious order, the Missionaries of the Precious Blood, had sent him to become pastor of one of the order's two remaining parishes in California.
While pleased with many aspects of his new assignment, there were certain things that bothered him. Passionate about the liturgy, Keyes felt that the parish's approach to the celebration of the Eucharist conveyed a somewhat casual attitude toward this central mystery of the Christian faith.
It was an accumulation of small things, notes Keyes, who recalls, for example, that the parish was using a loose-leaf lectionary rather than a bound copy. Keyes was troubled by the idea of having a "throwaway Word of God," as he puts it.
A trained musician with a number of published compositions to his credit, Keyes was particularly disturbed by the parish's musical repertoire. At his first Mass, for example, the choir sang "Gather Us In," whose third verse begins, "Not in the dark of buildings confining, not in some heaven light years away." Keyes was frustrated that a Catholic hymn would appear to dismiss our desire for heaven. "I said to people at the parish, ‘That's not what we believe!' " says Keyes.
In the months after he became pastor, Keyes set about making changes. Many were small, such as the decision to purchase real candles for Advent rather than the plastic oil lamp candles that had been used previously. "The point of an Advent wreath is to mark the passage of time," says Keyes. "You need real candles to do that." Keyes also found craftsmen within the parish who refurbished the ambo, baptismal font, and tabernacle.
It was Keyes' decision to radically reshape the parish's music program, however, that generated the most controversy. Keyes essentially banned the use of a number of popular contemporary hymns, particularly "praise and worship" songs with lyrics that sometimes reflect a Protestant theology. "They are not appropriate for a Catholic Mass," says Keyes.
His most striking innovation was to transform the parish's 10 a.m. service into a "sung Mass," with many parts being sung in Latin using Gregorian chant. Keyes favors using the chants from the Graduale Romanum and the Graduale Simplex-the two official chant books for the Mass-even though few parishes make use of them because of the complexity of the music.
The first few months were difficult. The original choir of almost 30 voices dwindled to a small handful. A number of families left the parish. Some parishioners accused him of wanting to return to a pre-Vatican II liturgy. The charge is ironic, says Keyes, because the Second Vatican Council's Sancrosanctum Concilium (Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy) specifically envisioned Catholics learning to sing the key parts of the Mass in Latin.
Not everyone was displeased with the new direction, however. After his first Christmas Mass at St. Edward's, one older parishioner came up and said, "Thank you for giving us our church back." A woman who now drives 20 miles to attend the 10 a.m. Mass every Sunday wrote Keyes a three-page letter thanking him for providing a "dignified, prayerful, and truly artistic celebration" of the Mass.
A visitor to St. Edward's 10 a.m. Mass finds an intriguing mix of old and new. Much of the "ordinary" of the Mass-the parts that recur from week to week, including the Kyrie, Gloria, Sanctus, and Agnus Dei-is chanted in Latin, as are the "propers," that is, the antiphons that are used for a particular Mass at the entrance, offertory, and Communion processions. The readings and homily and most (but not all) of the congregational responses are in English, as is the Eucharistic Prayer, which Keyes chants from beginning to end. Although Keyes has worked to teach parishioners the basics of chant, the congregation still tends to drop out on some of the more complex pieces.
Donalyn Deeds has been a parishioner at St. Edward's for more than 30 years and currently serves as the parish's director of religious education. She considers Keyes a friend as well as a boss and has not hesitated to challenge him on some of his changes. "I think we moved too abruptly," she says. "This parish had been doing contemporary music for such a long time. It's what people were used to."
Deeds concedes, though, that Keyes may have brought a much-needed sense of reverence back into the liturgy. "There is a lack of formality that is pervasive throughout our entire culture. People show up for Mass late and they leave early. They come in T-shirts and jeans. I think Father Jeff may have brought some needed discipline."
Although some of his parishioners see him as a conservative, Keyes resists the label. "When I preach about immigration, people think I'm a liberal. When I seek to do what the church asks when we celebrate the liturgy, people think I'm a conservative. All I seek to be is Roman Catholic," he says.
This article appeared in the August 2009 (Vol. 74, No 8, page 12) of U.S. Catholic.
Comments (89)
Liturgy
By MNS (not verified) on Sunday, November 22, 2009The word liturgy means: Work of the People. It seems as if the author of the article thinks the word should be translated instead as Clergy's Work.
This is a fundamental error. The People not the Clergy decide how to worship God. This means Laity select the book of prayer, music, architectural style, vestments, etc. The top down imposition of magic and mystery is an insult both to the faith and to followers by the Holy See. Tradition is not what faith in Christ is about. Let's have less of the lace, gold, incense and candles, and more honest charismatic prayer. Dump the Latin Mass! Let's have a Second Council of Constance and toss Ratzinger out.
Reply to MNS
By David Phillips on Monday, November 23, 2009If the Laity can select all of these things (book of prayer, vestments, etc), therefore selecting HOW they will worship God, then why not let them ALSO select WHAT they believe about the God they are worshipping? Why not let the laity in each parish determine which books they consider Scripture, which dogmas of the Faith they believe in, etc?
MNS, I say this not in a resentful tone: I cannot conceive of a more Protestant ethos than your comment. I honestly don't think that I belong to the same religion as you do.
Dump the Latin Mass? Such a notion was already explicitly condemned and anathemized by the Council of Trent. The future of the Church lies in its Tradition.
Tradition has EVERYTHING to do with what the Faith is about. All of the rites of the Catholic Church (Eastern and Western) originate in the Apostles and are part of the Tradition handed down.
"Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle." 2 Thess 2:14
Jesus did not speak Latin
By newtaste (not verified) on Tuesday, September 29, 2009Jesus did not speak Latin and He did not sing Gregorian chants. And, the Catholic Church really is going backwards by implementing prayers that are written in poorly constructed English. You don't translate word-for-word - that is not how translations work.
Jesus did speak Latin and still does
By Disciple (not verified) on Monday, January 25, 2010Actually Jesus spoke Latin, Greek, Aramaic and all other languages and still does...but this misses the point. In addition Jesus did not have anywhere to rest his head, so are you saying we should do things as Jesus did or only those things which he did do? The Holy Spirit leads the Church and those who love Him do as He leads, those who do not hear reject Him, and do not hear but reject the Father and the Son as well (cf. Luke 10:16)
A quick study and research of the history of Jewish Synagogue rites and Rabbi scholars discovers that Jesus, Mary and Joseph and all Jews did sing 'Gregorian" Chant, that is, what is the root and essence of this. The Holy Father, Gregory I, simply codified, etcetera, the sacred music chants ancient to the People of God - so, we can say Jesus sang "gregorian chant"...and the People of God are to be doing the same - just open up to what the Holy Spirit actually directed at Vatican II and following....
On whose and what authority do you speak on how translation is done? Certainly, the Holy Spirit has spoken on this - most recently Liturgiam authenticam. The Lord gave His Spouse, the Church, this divine authority.
check out this article:
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0540.html...
blessings in Jesus Christ
Agree
By certificate on Monday, November 9, 2009I agree, although this is the least of the problems with the Catholic church. They really need to open up preisthood to women and also allow them to marry. It has to be done.
Who is the Mass really for?
By Sarah (not verified) on Wednesday, September 9, 2009I worry that with the return of many pre-Vatican II ideas the only people left will be those who lean towards the old and want their relationship with God, through Liturgy, a personal rather than a communal celebration. Is it no wonder that the large Protestant churches with their incredible music and inspiring sermons are gaining the catholics and we are losing them. We need to remember that the Mass is NOT only for the priest, but shared with the people. What ever happened to the thought that Liturgy is for the people, by the people, with the people? Our Masses need to be places where all can feel comfortable - there should never be just one style and that style being only that which the priest likes. Unfortunately too many priests have no idea what people really need in their lives - protestant ministers seem to have gotten the message. We need reform - forward and not backwards. At 65 I love my Catholic faith but do not love the hierarchial decrees that seem to know what is best for my spiritual life. Allow me to worship in the way I am most comfortable - not in the conservative direction and not in the way some priest thinks is best for me. Let me have some say in the church I love.
WhoIS the Mass for?
By Ray (not verified) on Thursday, December 17, 2009Gezz, here I was taught the MAss was for Our expression of Faith to the Father...its not for the people. After all if no "people " show up and the Priest'Prelate or Pope say the Mass its VALID. if the Priest/Prelate or Pope DONT show there IS no Mass. Mass is to please God .As for the Latin Mass. The Holy father siad HE WANTS 1 in EVERY CHURCH. when will the "catholics' follow the Head of Christ church on Earth?
Liturgy is not of or by the people, but is for them (partially)
By David Phillips on Thursday, December 17, 2009Thank you Sarah and Ray for your comments. I think Ray is closer to the mark.
Sarah's comment above, and please take this in a charitable tone, expresses one of the major errors of our day. The truth is: Liturgy is NOT of the people or by the people. The Holy Mass is primarily Our Lord offering Himself to the Father; it is the sacrifice of Calvary made present in our midst. The Mass should NOT be about worshipping in the way WE feel comfortable. I
Ray is correct that the Mass is an act of thanksgiving, petitiion, praise, and propitiation offered by Christ to His Father. On the other hand, the Mass is also FOR the people in that Our Lord died so that we can be saved and we receive graces from each Mass. Although private Masses have their value, every Mass is communal in that the whole Church- in heaven, earth, and purgatory is involved.
It is true that at each Liturgy "we the people" do worship together- it should not be a private act for each person. It is also true that we each bring our own lives, prayers, pains, etc to each Mass to offer with the divine Victim. In a sense, we contribute to each Mass, but this needs to be correctly expressed and understood. Primarily, Mass is Our Lord offering Himself to the Father through the hands of his ordained priest.
Sarah, I think the point
By Fr. Jim (not verified) on Tuesday, September 15, 2009Sarah,
I think the point here is that worship is not meant to be what you or I like or are most comfortable with. The Mass belongs to the Church not to any one individual. Many "liberal" priests play games with the Mass and do not care what more traditional Catholics want. You certainly have the right to follow any legitimate Catholic spirituality, but we are not a Protestant church. We don't just worship for entertainment. Also I think your anti-priest views are most unfortunate and not uncommon among "progressive" Catholics. The priests job is not to make you comfortable. It is the "conservative" Catholics who are challenging you prophetically.
Mass is for God
By Jeffrey Pinyan (not verified) on Wednesday, September 9, 2009The Mass -- all of the Church's liturgy -- is an act of the WHOLE Christ, in his Head and his Body. The priest acts as the Head, the congregation as the Body. There is no such thing, Vatican II made clear, as a "private" Mass: every Mass is an action of the whole Church.
Mass is for God, first and foremost: adoration and thanksgiving. Then it is for us and all the world: contrition and supplication.
Mass is not ABOUT the community, it is about God. It is the community worshiping God, not acknowledging themselves. We must decrease, He must increase.
You said: "I love my Catholic faith but do not love the hierarchial decrees that seem to know what is best for my spiritual life."
What about the Catholics who said the same thing when the Mass was changed in the 1960's?
You said: "Allow me to worship in the way I am most comfortable..."
Plenty of Catholics already do that, staying home on Sundays. Worship is not about being comfortable; repentance isn't about being comfortable; metanoia isn't about being comfortable. The Christian life is not a "comfortable" one, by worldly standards.
