Logo

Parish counciling

Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Parish counciling
Lord knows these organizations need some help serving their communities.

OK, children, gather around. I'll tell you what life was like before parish councils, back when my hair was brown and my dreams were green.

The pastor pretty much ran things, and that was fine with most of us. First of all, we didn't have to go to a lot of boring meetings. Second, we were free to complain to one another (and sometimes to him) about what was wrong with the parish without feeling one iota of guilt or responsibility. Finally, we didn't have to go to a lot of boring meetings.

Then along came Vatican II and we realized that:

  • The church is "the people of God."
  • We laypeople have a lot of talent and knowledge parishes desperately need.
  • Priests and other parish staff people aren't especially trained or sometimes even very good at a lot of the things that go into running a parish.
  • If we laypeople were more involved in decisions about the parish, we would be more likely to accept them.

So God said, "Let there be parish councils," and there were parish councils. And God saw that it was good.

Well, actually, as far as we know God has not expressed a definitive position one way or another on parish councils, but the Pope thinks they're a good idea, and that should be enough for most of us.

Now, I come to praise parish councils, not bury them, though I'm not a big fan of them as presently constituted. It seems to me that most fall into one of three categories:

  • Rubber stamps for the pastor and staff.
  • A soapbox for complainers and obfuscators of all things parish.
  • A particularly cruel and unusual form of punishment for certain well-intentioned parishioners.

In all of the above cases, serving on a parish council seems like a waste of a good layperson's precious time. But that doesn't mean we should bury them. It means we should figure out how to make them operate better-that is, more in our interests.

This is not just a matter of changing the structure. At one parish I know, for example, the parish council was clearly not working, so the staff and lay leaders spent a year discerning what was wrong and how to fix it.

After considerable study and consultation they decided that since the parish council wasn't working, what was needed was to get the key people on every single one of the 70 or so parish ministries involved in the working of the council. The parish developed four "commissions," made up of representatives of all of the ministries, which were each to meet four times a year and report their activities to the council.

This meant that all the busiest people in the parish (including the parish staff, who were to attend each of the commission meetings) would now be required to go to at least four additional meetings per year.

Sure enough, after a couple of years the quarterly commission meetings have pretty much turned into poorly attended times for exchanging information and working out scheduling conflicts between and among ministries-nothing more. And the parish council still doesn't work.

As a businessman and former community organizer, I've tried to convince various parish councils that one of the problems they have is that they waste people's time. As in most good businesses and organizations:

  • Meetings should start on time.
  • A printed agenda should be sent out ahead of time.
  • People should be prepared to present and speak to the issues on the agenda.
  • Issues should be discussed and decided by majority vote.
  • The meeting should end on time or early-never late.

Everyone thinks these are good ideas-in theory. In practice, however, parish council meetings usually start late, waiting for stragglers to arrive, and then continue on until all hours of the night, trying to come to something called "consensus" on every issue.

This makes it difficult for members to explain to their spouses why they are home so late or to their bosses why they are sleepy the next day at work. It also makes it difficult to recruit people to serve on the council.

So why do I say that I have come to praise parish councils? I have come to praise the idea of parish councils-that is, a group of laypeople who can advise the pastor and parish staff on the key mission and function of the church.

Gregory F. Augustine Pierce, the author of The Mass Is Never Ended: Rediscovering Our Mission to Transform the World (Ave Maria Press, 2007) and Spirituality at Work: Twelve Ways to Balance Our Lives On-the-Job (ACTA, 2001). This article appeared in the June 2009 (Vol. 74, num. 6; pages 35-36) issue of U.S. Catholic.

Comments (2)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I agree that spirituality is

I agree that spirituality is an extrememly integral part of the process. The other integral part is a pastor who actually listens to the consensus decisions arrived at by the council. My experience? One pastor who did and the council was successful and the parish community thrived. And several pastors who did NOT and the council disintegrated into squabbles and infights by council members struggling to 'get the pastor's ear' on issues instead of arriving at a consensual agreement--and the parish community suffered.

Parish councils

They should not be run like a business. They should waste some time -- in prayer and prayerful consideration. Efficiency often rules out prayer and allowing the Holy Spirit into deliberations.

A few years back when I was on our council, we operated this way. No Robert's Rules of Order. Instead, consensus after prayful consideration. If no consensus, more prayerful consideration. The process was as important as the content, the issue at hand. And our pastor was just one more member -- even when giving our reactions to the scripture reading (chosen by a lay member on a rotating basis) to start the meeting. His was not the last word.

The church mortgage got paid off early, the roof fixed, we attended to parishoner's concerns -- and we all grew spiritually. People wanted on to the council for the spiritual experience. Shouldn't spiritual growth come first and be a part of all church activities? Otherwise, I agree, why have meetings.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comments are limited to a maximum of 1500 characters.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Answer this question to prove you are a human visitor and prevent automated spam submissions.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.