Catholic and feminist: You got a problem with that?
Catholics ought to be loud and proud in the fight for women’s rights, argues a young feminist.
I wasn’t burning my training bras or hating men (they weren’t yet on my radar screen, anyway), but my feminism was ardently liberal and a huge reason I struggled with my faith.
Over the past few years, I have become more immersed in the Catholic world, and I’ve learned that I’m not the only one who struggles with faith and feminism. There are, of course, many who reject Catholicism outright because of the lack of women in top leadership, and a few who courageously fight to change the 2,000-year-old patriarchal institution.
On the other hand, it seems that many vocal Catholics are saying, “I’m not a feminist.” For whatever reason—it’s too radical, man-hating, or pro-choice—a number of Catholic men and women deny or qualify feminism. By doing so, though, they are only hurting themselves and their sisters.
It’s time more Catholics, both men and women, opened up the conversation between these two points of view. I will always hope the church will treat women in its ranks more equally, but in opening this conversation, I also have come to see a positive relationship between Catholicism and an active feminism that aims to protect the rights of the most vulnerable. Because women, and consequently their children, still suffer the effects of poverty and other injustices more than men do, Catholics must fight for them.
Realizing this has allowed me to be as proud of being a Catholic as I am of being a feminist. For other Catholics, I hope reflecting on faith and feminism moves them to declare themselves proud to be feminists as well.
Apopular Catholic alternative to feminism these days is “new feminism,” Pope John Paul II’s idea that women should embrace their “feminine genius,” or capacity for physical and spiritual motherhood. New feminists defend the dignity of women who choose to stay home, a personal decision I admire, though I would not agree that all women are blessed with feminine genius simply based on gender.
My mother stayed home for nearly 20 years raising my brother and me, but she taught me that feminism extended beyond home life. Feminism is activism—protecting the rights of women in both the public and private sphere. As a feminist I raise women’s issues with friends and at work; I lobby for legislation and vote (knowing women have had this right for less than 90 years and currently hold only 16 percent of congressional seats); and I give to organizations that support women in the United States and abroad.
My greatest qualm with “new feminism” is that I think it is more about a personal decision than activism. Moreover it is not concerned with the “least of these” among us but instead with families that can afford to live off one income while one parent stays home.
An authentically Catholic feminism is not only about vocation or glass ceilings. It is about simply keeping the floor under women, respecting their dignity and rights as people.
Third World feminists challenge Western and predominantly white feminists to struggle not only with issues of gender but also those of race, culture, and class. This is essentially what Catholic feminism does. Catholic teachings on solidarity demand that we listen to the marginalized and oppressed. In this sense Catholic social teaching and feminism go hand-in-hand on many issues.
Catholics, for instance, take a feminist stance on workers’ rights. Issues like fair pay, family leave, and flexible scheduling allow women more equitable treatment at work, but they also promote the good of the family. This isn’t just about the do-it-all mom in upper management; it’s about families struggling to maintain a middle-class lifestyle with two salaries and single moms earning the minimum wage.
We need to fight for the likes of Lilly M. Ledbetter, who sued Goodyear when she learned she was paid less than the lowest-paid man at her level. Women, who still earn 78 cents for every $1 earned by men, were handed a setback when the Supreme Court ruled last May that complaints must be filed within 180 days of the first discriminatory pay decision, even if the employee only learns of the discrimination much later.
The ruling also violated Catholic principles about the rights of workers, which include the just wage. The decision was hailed for protecting businesses, but from a Catholic perspective the economy must serve people, not the other way around.
Catholics are also feminists in our preferential option for the poor and concern for human rights such as health care, education, food, shelter, and protection from violence. Feminists must take Catholic social teaching seriously because women are especially hurt by poverty and the violation of their rights and dignity as human beings.
The U.S. Census Bureau found that the poverty rate of female-headed households was about 30 percent in 2005. Catholic feminists should support an adequate social safety net to protect the health and welfare of women and their children in this country.
Cardinal Renato Martino, the president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, recently pointed out that this is an issue worldwide as well: “It must not be forgotten that today extreme poverty has, above all, the face of women and children, especially in Africa,” he said last August.
The United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), aimed at reducing global poverty, identify gender equality (goal #3) and women’s access to employment, education, and health care as economic problems. For those who live on less than a dollar a day—the majority of whom are female—putting food on the table is a women’s issue.
Catholic feminists can act in solidarity with these women by supporting development efforts. Microloans for women, co-ops, and education programs have become key strategies for development because it is now widely accepted that economies grow where women’s conditions improve.
Still, women seeking a better life elsewhere are now half of all migrants worldwide, according to Caritas Internationalis, the Catholic Church’s umbrella humanitarian organization. Caritas focuses on women and migration because women are more vulnerable to exploitation and trafficking than their male counterparts.
Violence affects female migrants, women in war-torn countries, rape victims shunned in their cultures, as well as American women facing domestic abuse and sexual assault. Preventing this violence, in my opinion, is one of the most important causes for feminists. Because each man and woman is made in God’s image, Catholics are called to confront and prevent violence against women wherever it may be.
But what about the elephant in the living room: How are human dignity and respect for the lives of women and unborn children best upheld in the hotly debated area that feminists call “reproductive rights”?
Certainly Catholics and feminists take a variety of stances on the many issues covered by the term reproductive rights: abortion, birth control, sex education, condoms in AIDS-ravaged countries, incest, and rape and its use as a tool of war.
There is some good news on the prickliest of these issues, abortion: A study by Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good found that from 1982 to 2000 benefits for pregnant women, including employment policies, economic assistance, and child care, reduced abortions. These are all women’s issues Catholic feminists can fight for while protecting the unborn.
Being Catholic and feminist isn’t easy, but the important part is that Catholics bring their faith to bear on their feminism, ask tough questions, and act on their beliefs.
When I got angry at my junior high friend for distancing herself from feminism, I’m not sure I could define feminism. In fact, it remains a flexible term covering a large and diverse movement.
But the statement “I’m not a feminist” still irks me. Women and men must look critically at the world, take into account their values, and figure out what it means for them to support the dignity and rights of their mothers, sisters, and daughters.
If Catholics did so, I think everyone would be as proud as I am to say, “I am a feminist.”
| And the Survey Says... | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | Disagree | Other | |
| I am a feminist: |
34%
|
44%
|
22%
|
| Pope John Paul II’s view of the “feminine genius” is more appealing to me than secular feminism. |
26%
|
32%
|
42%
|
| The Catholic Church has a good record on women’s rights. |
21%
|
67%
|
12%
|
| The abortion issue prevents me from calling myself a feminist. |
18%
|
66%
|
16%
|
| While poverty is an important issue, it shouldn’t be the main focus of feminists. |
48%
|
44%
|
8%
|
| Women have achieved equal rights and don’t need to fight for them anymore. |
5%
|
92%
|
3%
|
|
Results are based on survey responses from 101 U.S. Catholic readers and website visitors. Advance copies of Sounding Board are mailed to a sample of U.S. Catholic subscribers. A representative selection of their comments follow in Feedback.
|
|||
| The top causes for Catholic feminists should be: | |
|---|---|
| Poverty reduction. |
16%
|
| Reproductive rights. |
15%
|
| Health care. |
15%
|
| Pro-life. |
14%
|
| Violence prevention. |
12%
|
| Workplace equality. |
8%
|
| Upholding the value of motherhood. |
6%
|
| Women’s ordination. |
3%
|
| Other. |
11%
|
Megan Sweas is an assistant editor at U.S. Catholic. This article appeared in the January 2009 (Volume 74, Number 1; pages 23-25) issue of U.S. Catholic.
Yes, I Do Have a Problem with Feminism
By Anonymous (not verified) on Tuesday, June 28, 2011Yes, I do have a problem with Feminism in general and especially when people try to drag it into the Catholic Church. I am all for equality between man and women and have always supported the issue. However, while God created men and women equal He did not create them the same. That difference must be respected, to disrepect it is to disrepect God. Regardless of its stated goals Feminism is little more than "Man Hate". How many times have we hear feminists say things like "maleness is in conflict with the feminine"? Such concepts are inhuman and inmoral! God created man and women to be joined as partners in holy marriage. When there is conflict it has to do with the individuals, not their gender.
No, I Do Not Have A Problem With Feminism
By Jessica (not verified) on Friday, July 29, 2011I'm curious to know what "equality between men and women" looks like to you. What does "that difference must be respected" mean? I'd say there is definitely more than one difference between men and women. However, I think it's prudent to acknowledge that many differences are not innate, but are socially constructed. So, yes, there are some differences that are certainly to be respected because they are part of God's design. But other differences I would be hesitant to qualify as things we should simply accept without questioning. Especially when those differences discriminate against and marginalize women.
I also have to disagree with your statement that feminism is little more than man hate. I think that perspective is far too limited and based somewhat on ignorance. Feminism is about striving to recognize and combat the oppression of women. If we lived a society where men were making 70 cents to every dollar a woman made, where the majority of sexual harassment and assault was practiced by women more than men, and where women were in most positions of power while men were in the minority, then I would want to call myself a masculinist and fight for the rights of men and for gender equality. Since the opposite is true in our society, I think feminism is the most apt term. I suppose if you prefer the word equalism, that might work. Although having one universal name tends to create more solidarity.
As someone who considers herself to be a female identified, Catholic feminist, I completely agree with you that "Man Hate" is immoral and goes against God. God encourages us to love all people regardless of gender!
Lastly, "conflict has to do with individuals, not their gender"? If you choose not to recognize discrimination on the basis of gender, you will not be able to combat sexism. Let's all work together, men and women, feminists and those who prefer to not use that label, to create equality for all people.
I am not the anonymous who
By Anonymous (not verified) on Saturday, July 30, 2011I am not the anonymous who wrote the comment you are responding to, but I would like to respond. Let me first identify myself as "a woman of a certain age." I was born and raised before the Feminist Movement took force in the 1970s. So, I am aquainted with both the good and evil of that movement.
To answer your question: What does "equality between Men and Women" mean to me? It means that the gender of the person is not any impediment to what he/she is called to do or be by God.
To answer your question: What does "that difference must be respected" mean? That means that males and females must be respected as males and females in spite of, and because of, those differences. There is only one really big difference between males and females: females are mothers, males are fathers. God ordained this, not humans. And that must be respected. God did not exclude women from the political world, the economic world, the social world. Humans did that. But God did create women, not men, capable of giving birth, and men, not women, called to be priests in his church.
My question is: Who got the better part? If there is a better part.
Feminist in Church
By Michelle Lee (not verified) on Monday, September 20, 2010I believe that if you truly have faith in God, the act of being feminist shouldn't even come to mind. I've been a devoted Christian since High School and I was taught to never disrespect women and any way. Growing up my mother always told me to always respect others the same way I want to get treated. My mother didn't have that during her time. She grew up thinking women should stay up and take care of children but she went her own way. She is now a respected and successful Port Washington dentist that surpassed men that were trying to become a dentist in her class. So I believe that there is no reason to doubt women at all because they're capable of doing anything
I do not call myself a
By Anonymous (not verified) on Sunday, December 13, 2009I do not call myself a feminist, but on this issue, I must speak. Jesus never outright said a woman cannot be ordained. That he chose 12-men may very well have been because he knew human nature. At that time, people did not listen to women because their hearts were hardened. Similarly, a law allowing divorce was written in the Old Testiment because man's heart was hardened, but then Jesus came down and said it was incorrect. A law allowing a certificate of divorce is written in the Old Testament, but it was an incorrect, sinful law written by man according to Jesus. Similarly, Jesus did not write a law barring women from ministry. Check out Titus 2:3, where it says "the older women likewise, that they may be reverent in behavior, not slanderous, not given to much wine, teachers of good things-". Teachers of good things...isn't that what a priest is? And when Jesus rose, the first people he appeared to were women! It was Mary Magdalene he told to spread word that he had risen. Does that sound like he didn't want women preaching or spreading his word? It was man who outright banned women from ministry, not Jesus. If he did not want women teaching, he would have said so. I don't see any evidence that Jesus intended to bar women from being ordained. Any law barring women from anything was created by men after Jesus ascended into heaven. And when you look at the law regarding divorce, well, let's face it. Humans are not always correct, are they?
Viva la Papist Feminists!
By Anonymous (not verified) on Monday, May 11, 2009I hope to see this discussion expanded upon in the future. Looks to me like many in the "feminine genius" camp (a concept I agree with in its literal meaning) cite the idea as a way to end further discussion of women's role, duties, rights, risks in the world outside the home, and also of the realities of single women (who are not women Religious). Pretending everybody's a) married and b) can afford to be a one-income family just isn't going to work.
I'm in the middle of an e-fight as we speak over the whole Prejean and gay marriage business. I'm arguing that setting up Prejean as a hero makes it impossible for many Christians, and especially many Christian women, to have any place in that fight. It's as if, to fight for traditional marriage, we must accept immoral behavior on Prejean-the-hero's part. It's as if the controversies over sexism, objectification, dehumanization, increasingly bizarre bodies created by "cosmetic" surgeries, eating disorders, near-nudity in front of "judges", etc. etc. don't even exist; they're not issues for (most?) Christian men, therefore Christian women don't have the right to bring them up?
I truly feel that, right now, I have no home -- that, in addition to going against the mainstream culture because of ubiquitious sin, exploitation and immorality, I also don't fit in with most Catholics, for the same, albeit, slightly less frequent, reasons. John Paul II identified the hatred and exploitation of women as an integral aspect of Original Sin, but I've never met a single Catholic man outide of the priesthood who gets it. It's great (as in downright incredible!) that Catholic clergy are really starting to understand the particulars of the oppression of women, but when are the Catholic laity going to get a clue (not to mention Protestants)?
Feminism and Faith
By Sister Sharon (not verified) on Friday, January 16, 2009I always find it a bit ironic to hear men speak about feminism. I believe it to be an intellectual exercise. I often think the word Feminism was and is a word created to keep at arms length the truth of the blatant sexism that exists not only within our Church but in our world. Sexism, racism,ageism, etc are all considered to be evils within any system and are named as such. They cause division. I would suggest that one read the deeper content of the article and know that as women, we struggle to continue to live out our faith, within a Church that continues to rationalize its treatment of women through what I call "bible beatings." I have committed my life to the Church, not because of its blatant sexism, but because of the belief that God is present in each of us, and that our Church, this human institution, at some level does value each person. Unfortunately, the implementation of this truth has not yet been realized in current Church practices but I believe was present in the time of Christ. Until the argument/s end about who can do what because of gender, we will continue to miss out on the greater truth, that we each exist because we are a mere breath of a loving God.
I do admit that I long for a day when our Church will simply acknowledge that the current treatment of women is not upheld by the Gospels, but by tradition(gone astray!)...and that traditions can change! In the meantime, I will continue to live out my faith in a broken church, and I cling to my belief that with my Beloved, gender is an arbitrary thing we humans use for division.
Dear Sister Sharon to
By George Calleja (not verified) on Monday, February 16, 2009Dear Sister Sharon to believe sincerely what you so clearly and eloquently expressed and to have the spiritual strength to continue in your way of life is simply marverlious, simply heroic.
Catholic and feminist
By Jim Lein (not verified) on Tuesday, January 13, 2009Praying the Liturgy of the Hours (printed in 1976) almost every morning, I cringe when the reading seems to indicate that "men" are forgiven, that Christ came to save all "men."
My shorter, traveling version of the Liturgy from the Benedictines (1997) has more inclusive language and is virtually cringe-free, is fully open to all persons.
When reading the bishop's guidelines on forming our consciences before voting, my lectio divina habits led me to this focus: "troubled pregnant women." How can we show concern for the unborn without showing concern for the women carrying them? For all women? Labels -- such as pro-life, pro-choice, feminist, anti-feminist -- get in the way of our following Christ. Our language can limit our faith.
Collaboration
By gsk (not verified) on Saturday, January 10, 2009Excellent essay, Megan. I think you've covered all the pressing topics, which are part of a larger picture -- namely how to live holiness in a fallen world. That said, the reason I don't use "feminism" to describe my work of twenty years (as a writer on this topic) is 1. one has to constantly define it to make clear what exactly is meant by the term; and 2. I've come to the conclusion that any "-ism" devolves into a zero-sum game. Women often see the need to protect themselves -- even at the expense of babies or men. Only when we realise that solidarity has to bring everyone forward will it be effective.
Now for the other essential point: activism, I find it's short-sighted to think that one can change things in this way, in fact such a notion runs counter to our faith. We know that prayer and sacrifice are very effective tools -- a woman who loves souls can do great things while sitting in her apartment, offering up her chronic illness, offering up her busy day chasing toddlers, offering up the gentle nursing of an ailing relative, offering up her insomnia for the sanctity of her parish priest. It's a common foil to fall for the world's criteria of "activism" when quiet acts of charity will often do quite well.
This, I submit, is a crucial element of the "feminine genius" that collaboratively builds the entire Body of Christ without devolving into a worldly model or a "me-first" mentality.


