Debt ceiling falls on the poor?
There are congratulations all around tonight in Washington as President Obama, Senate leaders Reid and McConnell and House Speaker Boehner appear to have come to an agreement that could raise the national debt ceiling next week and avoid a perilous and unprecedented U.S. default. The deal in broad strokes cuts somewhere between $2.4 and $3 trillion from the federal budget over the next ten years without raising an additional nickel in revenue (remember it is federal revenue that has collapsed in recent years owing to slap-happy tax cuts on the top end during the Bush administration and the fiscal devastation of the recent recession.) The legislative devil, as always, is in the details. We will have to wait until tomorrow to see if G.O.P. tea partiers and liberal Democrats can hold their collective noses long enough to pass the agreement.
President Obama boasted tonight that the deal represents "the lowest level of domestic spending since Dwight Eisenhower was president." Without significant modifications to Social Security, Medicare and defense spending and stripped of provisions for new (or more accurately re-activated old) revenue streams, the historic cost cutting could prove devastating to domestic social service programs and overseas humanitarian aid.
The U.S. bishops have already flatly denounced proposed cuts in the nation's comparably tiny foreign aid budget. In a July 29 letter to the House Appropriations Committee, Bishop Howard J. Hubbard of Albany, chairman of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Committee on International Justice and Peace, and Ken Hackett, President of Catholic Relief Services (CRS), wrote that the foreign assistance appropriations bill proposed by a House subcommittee "makes morally unacceptable, even deadly, cuts to poverty-focused humanitarian and development assistance."
“These cuts will undermine integral human development, poverty reduction initiatives, and stability in the world’s poorest countries and communities....They could also weaken our long-term security, since poverty and hopelessness can provide a fertile ground for the growth of instability, conflict and terrorism.”
Speaking for the U.S. bishops, Hubbard and Hackett singled out as especially egregious cuts to funding for agricultural assistance for subsistence farmers, adaptation to climate change for vulnerable communities, medicines for people living with HIV/AIDS and vaccines for preventable diseases, assistance to orphans and vulnerable children, disaster assistance in places like Haiti, peacekeeping to protect innocent civilians in troubled areas such as Sudan and the Congo, and support to migrants and refugees fleeing conflict or persecution in nations such as Iraq.
Also casting a worried eye on the trade-offs for the debt ceiling hike will be the nation's hard-pressed state governors who can expect deep cuts in programs like job training, head start, nutrition support and Medicaid. They will either find a way to shoulder the burden on already overloaded state budgets or they may cut such programs out altogether. The fiscal shock treatment beginning in Washington may be coming at the worst possible time, beginning a vicious circle of government layoffs and spending reductions just as the nation teeters dangerously close to the edge of a double-dip recession or something much, much worse.
The far right are puppets for
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, August 3, 2011The far right are puppets for the richest 1%. The debt ceiling had to be raised and the Republicans chose to have it attached to the reduction of the deficit at a time of economic crisis when the businesses are hiring, people aren't buying and we need more money in the economy. So what did they decide to do? Take it from the poorest and most vulnerable, while leaving Jumbo Jet owners to keep there tax deductions. We have hit a point of cold heartlessness. One of the original commandments stated that a man could go on another's field and eat till his stomach was full, but could not put anything in his pockets. What happened to this fundamental truth of humanity? Why are we the only industrialized nation that refuses to provide what is needed for all? Instead we concentrate 70% of all the wealth in the top 2% and morons like the right wingers fight tooth and nail to try to get it to 80% while taking from those barely making it. Cutting unemployment, social security, medi-cal, medicare. It's easy to imagine that those suffering just are lazy or poor planners and deserve what they get, but one things this economic depression should show everyone is that no amount of planning in the world can prepare for every contingency. It's just too bad Obama sold out to the tea party for the last two years. He is a colossal failure. The only change I can believe in is that he will abandon those that supported him to try to capture the tea party vote by caving at every damn confrontation, sometimes never even trying to fight. He is as big a disappointment as George Bush.
The wind-up--predictable left-blame Bush and low taxes
By One who works on poverty (not verified) on Tuesday, August 2, 2011"(remember it is federal revenue that has collapsed in recent years owing to slap-happy tax cuts on the top end during the Bush administration and the fiscal devastation of the recent recession.)"--kev, I guess you forgot that O'Bama continued these cuts?? how convenient.
How many years/decades/generations of horrible failures and consequences will it take before the socialists realize that the federal government is not the solution---it is the problem??
God help you!
We're just getting what we deserve.
By Anonymous (not verified) on Tuesday, August 2, 2011"Legalized" abortion? "Legalized" same sex "marriage?" Rampant sex, adultery, debauchery throughout this culture of death?
Does anyone think God doesn't love us enough to chastise the living daylights out of us and straighten us out?!
Support Catholic charities
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, August 3, 2011Just think of how many real Catholic charities you could support if the government didn't want to squeeze every dime from you. Wouldn't you like to contribute more to those charities that don't keep more than half of what they receive for themselves (like the government does) and gives more to the poor who legitimately cannot feed themselves? God does not bless nations that turn their backs on Him (legalized abortion, same-sex marriage, all other manifestations of the Culture of Death). If you want to get political, reports show that Conservatives give more to charity than others do. The Tea Party may be America's hope.
What do lower taxes actually mean?
By Meghan Murphy-Gill on Wednesday, August 3, 2011You're right, if I paid lower taxes (and as a Chicago resident, I pay some of the highest in the nation), I might have more to donate to charity and organizations I see doing work to elevate the poor. However, the government could also be taking the money and investing it in social infrastructure rather than "defense spending" and I'd be happy.
Unfortunately, even when taxes are cut (usually for the wealthy--not so much to make an actual difference for the middle class; just look at the dollar amount you have to donate in order to get a deduction for charitable donations; it's a much larger percentage of my income than those in the higher income brackets), lawmakers encourage not investing in social infrastructure or charity, but rather buying things, under the ruse of stimulating the economy and being patriotic.
Do you recall what happened after 9/11 and the Bush tax cuts? I'll jog your memory: everyone, including those who couldn't afford it, was encouraged to buy a home and spend, spend, spend. They weren't encouraged to invest in organizations that promoted the common good. Who benefited from that? Here's a hint: it wasn't the poor and it certainly wasn't the charities. It was Wall Street and the heads of major corporations.
And then what happened? We reached a tipping point, the housing bubble burst and the government bailed out these companies on the backs of hardworking tax payers, who can't pay their own mortgages, let alone contribute to charities.
So I ask you, what does having lower taxes actually mean for American society?
Not what I've seen
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, August 3, 2011My right-wing Republican "orthodox" Catholic Rush Limbaugh/EWTN/FOX News in-laws don't think the government should do anything to help individuals. They think all charity should be voluntary but don't give a dime to charity. They think there's no excuse to be poor in America and giving to the poor only encourages their lazieness. I've heard that conservatives give more to charity than others but I haven't seen it personally. I've seen the opposite.
Charity
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, August 3, 2011I am not trying to attack your in-laws; they may simply not be aware of our duty as Catholics to help the less-fortunate. However, truly "orthodox" Catholics are mindful of the corporal works of mercy, which include feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, and harbouring the harbourless. Most of us don't have opportunities to do that on our own, so we give to charity. That also includes providing for the needs of the Church (which is one of the largest, if not the largest, charitable organizations in the world,) which is one of the Precepts of the Church.
Feel free to attack them
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, August 3, 2011and every other right-wing Republican Catholic who doesn't donate to charity. There are a ton of them. I'm a middle-aged lower middle class liberal and I've been donating to charity since I graduated from college. My wife and I regularly donate to several charities and to others as they come along including disaster relief. My in-laws and other conservative Catholics give squat including to Catholic Charities. I've watched them pass on the second collection basket. They probably think Catholic Charities is just another liberal organization. As I said, they don't think there's any excuse to be poor in America, if you're poor here it's your own fault. I don't know how they justify not giving to charities overseas. Maybe they think the poor are lazy there too. This is the attitude of many conservatives not just Retro Catholic ones. You're right, it goes against Church teaching but the priests and bishops almost never tell them. Conservative Retro Catholics are their base and most priests and bishops are conservative too. They'll go on about how other Catholics aren't following Church teaching but they say nothing about how conservative Catholics don't either.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. Links are not allowed and comments with them will be moderated or deleted. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.

