A ridiculous mountain of red silk
I've been holding back all week for fear of stirring up a hornet's nest, but my only response to the Latin Mass celebrated last Saturday at the Basilica of the Immaculate Conception in Washington has to be: Really? Seriously? (You can read the fawning CNS coverage of "ancient chants and pomp, splendor and majesty" here.)
Who thought it was a good idea to dress up a bishop in a cappa magna and parade him around triumphantly in celebration of what Bishop Edward Slattery of Tulsa, Oklahoma referred to as "the fifth anniversary of the ascension of Joseph Ratzinger to the throne of Peter" while the church is in such a profound crisis of confidence in its leadership? Ascension to the throne, eh? Are we speaking of the "servant of the servants of God" here or the Emperor Augustus?
Now is not the time for the "church militant" to be trying to pass itself off as the "church triumphant," especially when so many princes of the church seem hell-bent on steering the Bark of Peter onto the rocks. (I don't know what the plans are for his throne.) Remember that the original presider for this "celebration" was supposed to be Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, the former head of the Congregation for Clergy, who had to withdraw because he wrote a repulsive letter to a French bishop congratulating him for shielding an abusive priest from the civil law.
And I have to ask: If we're going to get stuck on a particular period in church history and its liturgy, does it have to be the 16th century? It was hardly a time of--how to put it?--liturgical modesty, much less the "noble simplicity" that is, after all, the historical hallmark of the Roman rite. Unless His Excellency is going to wrap that cappa magna around his waist and start washing feet, as Jesus did in John's gospel.
It's one thing to seek the mystery presumably embodied in ancient forms, but I hardly see how frippery of this magnitude glorifies God, who has no need of such things. In fact, when sackcloth should be the defining couture, silk is a stumbling block and an obstacle to the proclamation of the gospel. If anything, the sex abuse crisis is a call to a renewed humility.
So I still think this question needs an answer: Without reference to the reformed liturgy, how did Saturday's "solemn high pontifical Mass in the extraordinary form" bear witness to the kingdom of God Jesus announced?
So, you admit you were wrong?
By Qualis Rex (not verified) on Tuesday, May 4, 2010You wrote "As for church history, I am comforted by the fact that so many of the great saints of the church railed against such displays in their own time."
But when challenged, didn't bother to respond to just WHICH saints you were referring to. Which means:
1. they don't exist, and you are wrong
2. they aren't Saints of the Catholic church, but heretics like Luther that you were referring to
Either way, you lose all credibility here. Have fun with that.
Frankly Mr. Cones, its rich
By CJM (not verified) on Tuesday, May 4, 2010Frankly Mr. Cones, its rich of you to complain about the 16th century when those of your ilk continue to subject the People of God to masses that seem permanently stuck in a 1970s time-warp. Where is your outrage over the travesty that occurred at the LA Religious Education Conference?
I'll gladly take a mountain of red silk any day over tie-dye and twirling deacons.
The cappa magna in the post-Vatican II world
By Jeffrey Pinyan (not verified) on Monday, May 3, 2010Even in our post-Vatican II world, the 'cappa magna' is still an approved vesture for bishops. From the Ceremonial of Bishops (like the GIRM, but for liturgies involving a bishop):
"The purple 'cappa magna', without ermine, may be worn only within the diocese and for the most solemn feasts." (CB 1200)
So while the regulations for its use have changed, it still exists!
Is this the record for most comments?
By Eminem Recovery June 22 in stores (not verified) on Monday, May 3, 2010At a current total of 168 comments, does this "Red Silk" post hold the record/trophy for "most comments on a US Catholic blog"?
It looks like you indeed stirred up a hornet's nest, Bryan. LOL.
Man uses words to convey an objective meaning.
By David L Alexander (not verified) on Monday, May 3, 2010It is all he really has ... http://bit.ly/btuqw5
Why do you hate Bryan, Jesus? :)
By KDaly (not verified) on Wednesday, May 5, 2010Ach, mein Himmel -- such faux sturm und drang over such fluff and oddities of bad kerfuffle theology and catholic kubuki. These posts are like bad edits for Ru Paul's Drag Show -- at least she had authentic drama [queens] instead of ol' hissy church ladies. Really, Bryan, was this article your editorial penance for missing some deadline?
If I can't beat KDaly's coo-cookubuki, then I guess I'll join it
By Eminem Recovery June 22 in stores (not verified) on Wednesday, May 5, 2010To quote the one and only RuPaul's one and only hit single:
YOU BETTER WORK (cover girl)
WORK IT GIRL (give a twirl)
DO YOUR THING ON THE RUNWAY
WORK, TURN TO THE LEFT
WORK, NOW TURN TO THE RIGHT
WORK, SASHAY SHANTE
LOL
Watch the video/ listen to the song....NOW lol
By Eminem Recovery June 22 in stores (not verified) on Wednesday, May 5, 2010- RuPaul "Supermodel", this is truly bizarre from back in the day:
IORR
By Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, May 5, 2010Ru Paul? Wow. I'm really praying for you man. Get the new Exile when it comes out quick.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. Links are not allowed and comments with them will be moderated or deleted. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.

