Logo

Massive demonstration in Washington for immigration reform

Friday, March 19, 2010

Many immigrants and friends will gather this Sunday on the Washington Mall to demonstrate and put pressure on President Barack Obama to get moving on comprehensive immigration reform. Among the ordinary citizens, the advocates, the unionists, and the clergy, there are expected to be a substantial number of undocumented. Some will be there anonymously, hiding in the crowd. But some of the younger undocumented, brought here as young children and educated in our schools, will be there with an “in-your-face” attitude. They will not be hiding (see Los Angeles Times ).

The demonstration is not going unnoticed. President Obama has met with Senators and immigration advocates only this week. Sheriff Joe Arpaio is planning one of his “crime sweeps” in Phoenix as his own “in-your-face” response (Arizona Republic). But more significantly Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsay  Graham (R-SC), who have been working on legislation for months, co-wrote an op-ed piece in the Washington Post outlining their approach to immigration reform. Schumer is chair of the immigration subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Graham the ranking minority member.

They admit the current immigration system is “broken” and they propose to replace it with something more “rational” set on “four pillars":

  • The first would be a biometric Social Security card that all seeking to work in the U.S. must present in seeking employment. This already has brought howls from the civil libertarians, since it smacks of an “internal passport.” Employers who hire the undocumented will suffer penalties.
  • The second is a step up in border and interior security. This comes at a moment when Secretary Janet Napolitano of Homeland Security has stopped work on the “virtual fence” being erected in Arizona by Boeing (see New York Times article ).
  • The third pillar is a temporary worker program. This will be vigorously opposed by labor unions, since it’s framed to encourage a creaming of overseas talent at the expense of home-grown talent. One thing it does propose is a green card (permanent residence) for low-skill workers after successive years picking our crops and digging our ditches.
  • The last pillar is “a tough and fair path to legalization” for the 11 million undocumented already here.

It’s quite clear that there will be differences on all four pillars – maybe even equaling the course of health care reform.. So far there has been no Republican who has joined Lindsey Graham, and, since the GOP is infatuated with Tea Partiers and the New Patriots, few are likely to come forward. The unions are insisting on a commission to keep any guest worker program honest. The U.S. bishops are likely to fault the Schumer-Graham approach because it is not organized around the real need in reform – family unification. But at least there is some movement. Let’s hope its progress does not experience the agony of health care reform.


The mess in immigration court gets worse
A non-governmental study of immigration courts finds that 228,421 immigrants are waiting to have their cases heard. The delays average 439 days and are as high as 713 days in Los Angeles and 612 days in Boston. An axiom of American law is “justice delayed is justice denied.” These delays wreak havoc on immigrant families and weigh heavily by those held in detention (see Washington Post article ).

Posted in: In preview mode

Comments (7)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

US Immigration Reform

The administrator grants immigration to strangers entering to become members of what they call “in-demand employee”. Is that really the case? Or ministry are just take part as heroes for aliens whose own native land cannot feed its own people. What about us who get displaced. Is this not also the same as the battle in Afghanistan where the administrator risks our own soldiers for interior problems of other land?

Immigration demonstration

The corporate media has controlled the agenda for over 50 years but now it's worse than ever. I was trying to get news coverage of the immigration demonstration on Capitol Hill.

It seems that the over 200,000 strong attendants were ignored by the news. They will cover 5,000 Tea Party demonstrators with Hitler signs for days but genuine grassroots events are ignored.

Just more taxes for the American people

I agree with a system to import highly skilled workers, scientists, engineers and real PH.d. But we cannot afford to bring in to this country, those who end up on the bread line, expecting American taxpayers to cover their economic problems? The majority that have intentionally slipped through our laughable border defense, through airport control are here to take unfair advantage of Taxpayers. This is displayed negatively in states like New York, Arizona and the refuge illegal alien state of California. California has become a welcoming government welfare state for illegal single females with their infants and millions of others, have sponged off the citizens and legal residents for decades.

Why should only highly

Why should only highly skilled workers be the ones we accept? What about poor Pablo who lives in a cardboard box in his barrio? He gets the shaft because of where he was born?

From the New Colossus inside the Statue of Liberty:

Give me your tired, your poor
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

That is what America is all about... a beacon of hope for the downtrodden, not an elitist hotel.

The realities are that unless you a direct descendent of an indigenous people of the Americas, then your own family lineage were immigrants. Thus, for you not to afford that exact same opportunity to another immigrant who wants it is rather hypocritical, is it not?

Re Illegal immigrants: If we got rid of every single illegal immigrant tomorrow, our entire economy would collapse. They keep prices down which in turn puts more money back in your pocket. In fact a large percentage of economists (if not the majority) believe that the gains of having illegal immigrants outweigh the costs.

I live in California and have had personal experience with many illegal immigrants. They work harder than many/most American citizens. Here's a prime example of why the poor need to be let in as well:

20/20 Article Here

Peace!

Eminem-Recovery in stores now's picture

Reply to Brittanicus

A lot of hostility is being directed toward the average immigrant.  The commenter says they are taking unfair advantage of taxpayers. 

But why don't I hear any shouts of anger towards the corporate elite, who stole jobs away from hard-working Americans, and, without hesitation, sent those jobs to other countries- just because they could get the labor at a much lower cost (and often treat the workers as slaves, I might add).

These unpatriotic, conscience-less, inhuman, greedy thieves are the ones who deserve the wrath of God.    The rich can have their "global economy" and their "world without borders" - but the poor must remain within the assigned borders.  (We have to contain "the rabble" somehow, right?)  

Both mainstream parties pushed for globalization and free trade and got it.  Clinton signed NAFTA, to those naive who think the Democrats are somehow out for the working class.

I wish the "tea party" would direct the bulk of its hostility toward the powerful elite, not  toward the average joe or the poor mexican.  But then again, in warped Republican thinking, the rich are the "winners"... and we should all be good "waterboys for the rich."   I say to them:  Hogwash.

Insourcing jobs

Corporations support mass immigration to reduce the cost of labor. Not all jobs can be outsourced to foreign lands. Jobs than can not be outsourced can have labor cost reduced by bringing in cheap foreign labor and driving labor costs down.

This is not new. Corporate farmers encouraged mass legal and illegal immigration which Cesar Chavez fought against as leader of the United Farm Workers.

While I don't share your hatred of corporations and faith in big government, corporations are not saints. Many would gladly sell products that would stregnthen the position of dictators and jeopardize national security. Unlike the state, they do not have the power of the police.

Eminem-Recovery in stores now's picture

Precisely Jerry D....

Corporations are not saints, and would often gladly do whatever it takes to make more profit, ignoring human values.    You are correct on this point.

I don't have "faith" in "big government" .... and I also do not hate corporations.

Corporations can be used for good, and probably are even necessary.  However, they need to be strictly regulated - and government is the only one who can do it.  Further, corporations should not be considered "persons"....they should serve real persons instead.  Insourcing, outsourcing, and any other abuses that compromise human dignity should be against the law.   Perhaps international laws need to be written to help reduce these kinds of abuses across the globe.  Those who benefit from the abuses are not going to do it on their own;  only a mass movement of "the people" can make it remotely possible.

This is not utopia.  I acknowledge that both corporations and government can be, and are, abused.  But why do conservatives tend to hate government so much and put so much faith in corporations?  We all need to find a more balanced perspective here.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comments are limited to a maximum of 1500 characters.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Answer this question to prove you are a human visitor and prevent automated spam submissions.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.