Logo

Abortion facts in health care reform

Thursday, March 11, 2010
ShareThis

Should health care reform pass, it seems, from what some are saying, that pregnant women across the country will be running out to get abortions. It will be as if abortion became legal all over again!

While there's been a lot of speculation about the effect of health care reform on abortion, until now, I've had no idea what the Senate bill actually says about it. Take it with a grain of salt if you will--it comes from Catholics who support reform because in this country the best (and most cost effective) way to access the human right to health care is through having insurance--but here are the abortion-related provisions in the Senate-approved health care reform bill: (Here's the full letter to Senate leaders from Catholic and Evangelical leaders.)

  • Prohibits the Secretary of HHS from requiring the coverage of any abortion services as part of the essential health benefits for any qualified health plan offered in a state insurance Exchange (pg. 2070);
  • Allows the insurance company to decide whether or not to include coverage of abortion services, including the Hyde abortion exceptions, in a qualified health insurance plan offered in a state insurance Exchange (pg. 2070);
  • Prohibits insurance companies from using federal funds, including federal tax credits and cost-sharing assistance, to pay for abortion services except for those services allowable under the Hyde amendment (pg. 2071);
  • Requires an insurance company that chooses to offer a plan in a State Exchange with abortion coverage, beyond the Hyde abortion exceptions, to collect a separate second premium payment from each enrollee for the cost of the abortion coverage (pgs. 2071-2072 & 2074-2075);
  • Requires the insurance company to deposit all separate payments into a separate account that consists solely of abortion premium payments and that it is used exclusively to pay for such services (pgs. 2072-2074);
  • Requires the state health insurance commissioners to ensure that insurance companies comply with these requirements in accordance with guidance and accounting standards set by the Office of Management and Budget and the Government Accountability Office (pg. 2075)
  • Requires insurance companies that offer general abortion coverage as part of a qualified health plan to provide a notice of coverage in the summary of benefits and coverage explanation (pg. 2076);
  • Allows states to pass a law prohibiting the inclusion of abortion coverage in plans offered in a state health insurance Exchange (pg. 2069);
  • Requires the director of the Office of Public Management to ensure that there is at least one private, multi-state qualified health plan offered in each state insurance Exchange that does not provide coverage of abortion services beyond the Hyde exceptions (pgs. 2087-2088);
  • Prohibits insurance companies offering qualified health plans from discriminating against any individual health care provider or health care facility because of its unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions (pg. 2076);
  • Prohibits the preemption of state laws regarding abortion (pg. 2077); 
  • Maintains current Federal laws relative to conscience protection; willingness or refusal to provide abortion; and discrimination on the basis of the willingness or refusal to provide, pay for, cover, or refer for abortion or to provide or participate in training to provide abortion (pg. 2077); 
  • Establishes and provides $250 million for programs to support vulnerable pregnant women (pgs. 2170-2173); and
  • Increases the adoption tax credit and makes it refundable so that lower income families can access the tax credit (pgs 2400-2407).

From what I see, I don't understand why this doesn't match the scrutiny of the requirements to uphold the Hyde Amendment (which the bishops support though it does make exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother).

In fact, one element--the requirement for insurance companies to provide notice of coverage for abortion--would help all who want to avoid "complicity" with abortion out. I bet most, unless you have insurance through a Catholic organization, pay for insurance that includes abortion coverage. Having the option to buy insurance that doesn't have abortion coverage is a plus to this plan.

Despite our best efforts to keep federal funds away from abortion, the fact remains that we live in a country where abortion is legal. Until it becomes illegal (and as a pragmatist I doubt it will), having insurance in which pregnancy isn't a pre-existing condition and having $250 million in programs to support vulnerable pregnant women will do a lot of good for the unborn.

Posted in: In preview mode

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bogus abortion facts in health care

It baffles me why the democratic leadership would provide so much red tape for abortion funding and, at the same time, ardently oppose the Stupak amendment to block federal funding of abortion. Couldn't they have saved themselves a lot of time and effort by simply accepting the original House version with the Stupak amendment? If Pres. Obama was committed to keeping tax dollars from funding abortion why did he deem the House bill with Stupak's amendment "unacceptable in its current form". It's all very fishy and points toward some "cooking of the books" instead of a true separation of federal funds. If anyone has questions about how federal funds CAN be used to fund abortion through community health centers, they should consult the Bishops' Conference document on the subject. A president who has fought hard to expand and support the right to abortion CANNOT be trusted to protect innocent unborn lives. Also, since when in Catholic Doctrine to the "ends justify the means". Does the Church really allow us to "do harm" in order to bring about some other "good". The answer clearly is NO.

Megan, are you surprised that the Bishops disagree with you?

Dear Megan,
Today I read the statement from the Bishops--stating their disagreement with the current bill--and with your view. Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer do not agree with your view.
1. It is likely that the House will pass the Senate version which does not preclude abortion funding to the extent that you describe.
2. The Bishops point out that the overall set of bills is so expensive as to be detrimental to the Nation---and, in my view, therefore detrimental to our ability to support the poor.
3. The Pesident and the Speaker have been very clear that this approach to healthcare is the first step towards other legislation which will increase expensive gov involvement in our lives.

abortion coverage in health care bill

It seems to me that the bill as it exists sufficiently covers the necessity of preventing government funding of abortion. It does not prevent private funding of abortion as Catholics might hope, but in this pluralistic nation we have to live with the reality that abortion is still legal. I can see no justification for being against the health care bill because we cannot get everything we want. What we would get is essential health care that is the human right of the uninsured.

I'm sorry but health care is

I'm sorry but health care is not a human right. Health care is an individual responsibility and where there are some who sincerely cannot afford it or not get access then that is where we as a society step in to lend a helping hand but that does not mean that it has to be an excuse to expand the role of government. This is a role for private charities, especially catholic charities to step up to the bar and help those in need get access to basic health care. I think there are too many of us with generous hearts and compassion who get misdirected into thinking that a government response is always the preferred response. Jesus didn't tell the Jews to turn to Rome for their needs but to turn to each other.

Health care is a human right in the US

Not sure where you live? But in the US, we decided long ago that health care is a human right.

You may argue that physicians should refuse care to the indigent, that hospital emergency rooms should refuse admittance to those who can't pay, and that Medicare for seniors and Medicaid for the low income is a bad idea. However, it's unreasonable to deny that all of those are reality.

Do you think anyone should have health care? You? Your family? Your friends?

Healthcare is a right???

WHO PAYS

we all pay

Everyone who has a job. Look at your w-2. Medicare takes 1.45% of all of your wages come out of your paychech and your employer matches it.

Of course, we don't all qualify for Medicare. What's wrong with that picture? We all pay in, and only 65+ get coverage. Where's my Tea Party?

We all Pay????

Just to clarify: low income earners who receive the earned income tax credit do not pay for medicare. If their wages are low enough, they get free Medicare and a welfare check from the IRS (a refundable credit)

JerryD-if you had a job, you'd know

Employee and employer (that's the owner of the company) both pay 1.45% for medicare on each and every dollar a regular wage employee earns. From the first dollar to the last. We wage earners see it on our paychecks.

The EIC calculation is unrelated to social security and medicare taxes, with the exception of a single person making less than $13,400 per year. Then it's used to calculate the plateau of $457 and then the phase out. There is no other relationship.

The age for Medicare eligibility is 65. A person is automatically enrolled if they're collecting social security.

You want to complain about welfare checks, look at farm subsidies, welfare ranchers, halliburton, general dynamics, the massive bailout of AIG, et al...welfare for the low income are rounding errors in comparison.

I'm not sure where your "facts" are coming from?

We all Pay????

Just to clarify: low income earners who receive the earned income tax credit do not pay for medicare. If their wages are low enough, they get free Medicare and a welfare check from the IRS (a refundable credit)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.