Logo

Surprise, surprise! Rome rolls out the red carpet for unhappy Anglicans

Tuesday, October 20, 2009
ShareThis

Taking a page from arrangements in the U.S., U.K, and Australia, Rome is preparing a legal process for Anglicans unhappy over women's ordination and a more permissive approach to homosexuality to enter the Roman Catholic Church--while keeping their Anglicanism intact.

According to the Washington Post, Rome intends to create "personal ordinariates"--basically a loosely geographical diocese that serves Catholics who still want to use Anglican liturgies. This isn't unlike the "personal prelature" created by the late Pope John Paul for Opus Dei, which gave Opus Dei its own bishop with jurisdiction over its members.

The personal ordinariate will be governed either by a priest or bishop (I bet it will be the latter). Married Anglican priests will be ordained as Roman Catholic priests; married bishops will, however, not be able to function as bishops, given the long (though not consistent) tradition in Orthodox and Roman Catholic churhes of ordaining only unmarried priests to the order of bishop. The Anglicans-turned-Catholics will also be allowed their own houses of formation--seminaries--to preserve the "Anglican patrimony" in the Catholic church. In other words, this could be a permanent arrangement.

I find this an interesting move, especially since it further undermines the celibate clergy in the Roman rite. Why wouldn't a man who wanted to marry switch to the personal ordinariate to be ordained? Believe me, the day will come when these Anglo-Catholic priests are enlisted in regular Roman Catholic parishes, and married clergy will be a done deal.

P.S.: Expect the same arrangement for the Society of St. Pius X when the time comes. I fully expect the use of this novel "personal ordinariate" to accommodate other groups that want to go their own way liturgically and otherwise--so long as they are on the proper end of the political spectrum, which has been the Roman approach to ecumenism of late, as I argued in my September 2008 column.

Posted in: In preview mode

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Second comment about the red carpet article

By the way, in regards to the SSPX point, no one is taking into consideration that the premise of the SSPX is that there hasn't been a Pope in existence since Pius X. My question is this: How can a Pope allow a group back into the fold who says the seat of the Pope is vacant?

My first comment about the red carpet

In 1896, Pope Leo XIII declared Anglican Orders null and void with his Bull Apostolicae Curae. Does Pope Benedict's actions now wipe out this Papal Bull? When Leo XIII issued this Papal Bull, hopes of reuniting the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church were lost.

Why can't Vatican officials spend the same amount of time and energy coming up with a plan to welcome Catholics back into the fold who are no longer functioning as priests because they chose a vocation of marriage? If the issue is only in regards to the priest shortage, then why would the Pope allow a group in who has left one fold over a disagreement, when there are plenty of men who are already Catholic who could be functioning as sacramental priests.

The Vatican should also be spending time and energy on coming up with a plan to welcome back those Catholics who have left the Church because they don't feel that spiritually they can worship as full and active members of the Catholic Church. Perhaps it is time that the Church wake up and minister to those people who need the compassion that the Roman Catholic Church can offer. If too many people continue to leave the Church, then the discussion of married clergy will be a mute point. If there isn't a flock to minister to, then there won't be a need for a shepherd regardless of whether or not he is married.

Please explain.

As a woman, I have not always agreed with the church regarding not allowing clergy to marry. However, I do understand and highly respect how a man can choose to be celebate because of his love for God and his church. I am also underdstanding of and at peace with women not being able to be ordained a priest.

I have always understood that a Catholic Deacon could not marry if not already married when ordained. Am I correct?

Does this now mean that even though the church will accept a married priest (or Deacon) coming into the Catholic Church from outside the Roman Catholic faith, nothing will change for those who chose, from the beginning, to live a celebate life in order to serve in the Roman Catholic Church?

Perhaps I don't understand?

I wonder

I wonder what this potentially means for the Permanent Diaconate. All those guys that became deacons because they couldn't be married priests will petition Rome. The rest of us that became permanent deacons to be the Church in the world by modeling Christ the servant will have our hands full for sure.

There will be a lot of discernment over this. I know several of my brother deacons that will follow this closely.

Bryan Cones's picture

Great point

Not to mention all those priests who left active ministry only because they wanted to marry! I don't think the Vatican has thought this through completely. A smart-aleck like me might want to say it's the Spirit at work, but I do think this sets a precedent that's going to be hard to overcome. Even more conservative folks have begun to question the celibacy requirement now that, at least in the U.S., we are admitting not only married Episcopalians to orders but Lutherans, too. As a former coworker of mine complained, why wouldn't a RC man who wanted to marry and be a priest not become an Episcopal priest and then petition to be received back into the church?

And, as you say, the question of "true" diaconal ministry is bound to come up, once those who always felt called to priesthood start asking to be ordained as presbyters. And consider the sheer number of permanent deacons in the U.S. More than 10,000, no?

Bryan Cones

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.