Logo

More positive on the pope

Wednesday, March 18, 2009
ShareThis

For those who want a more positive spin about the pope's letter of explanation regarding the SSPX than my post (for which I feel I have been unjustly called a know-it-all responsible for all the problems in the church!), you might like former America magazine edtior Jesuit Tom Reese's commentary from Newsweek. Reese's piece is chock full of good points, and he cuts the pope a lot more slack than David Gibson of Beliefnet or I did, which is especially charitable since it was Joseph Ratzinger who got Tom fired from America! One especially important action that Reese highlights is the pope's decision to demote Ecclesia Dei, the commission charged with dealing with the SSPX and groups like it, from relative independence, subordinating it to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

I'd still like to draw attention to one of Reese's central points, which he shares with Gibson and me: "The one criticism that the pope does not answer in his letter is from those who feel he reaches out to dissenters on the right but not on the left. Could we take the same conciliatory language and apply it to those who reject the church's teaching on birth control, married clergy and women priests? Can there be another commission whose responsibility is to reach out and negotiate with these factions in the church? "Can we simply exclude them, as representatives of a radical fringe, from our pursuit of reconciliation and unity?"

To those issues, we might add the use of condoms to prevent the spead of HIV, about which the pope spoke on his current trip to Africa, which drew this response from a guest columnist at the Washington Post's On Faith blog. Not for the faint of heart! People think I'm bad...

Posted in: In preview mode

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

contraception is immoral

The comments you make on this subject and the columnist from the Washington Post both are wrong in the views on birth control because of the simple fact that sex is to be the ultimate form of conjugal love between a husband and his wife and not a form of fulfilling one's lustful tendencies. The use of condoms doesn't prevent AIDS, not having sex does. The use of condoms only promotes promiscuity and the lack of respect for the other person. This is to say that the person you are having sex with is treated as an object for sexual fulfillment and not as a person, who isn't to be used or abused as an object. Abstaining from sex prevents AIDS not the use of condoms.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
U.S. Catholic insists on a civil and respectful dialogue on our website, following our Comment policy. Comments should be charitable, on topic, and brief. U.S. Catholic reserves the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We encourage you to choose your words wisely.