Jewish-Catholic relationship gets rocky
A leading Italian rabbi has pulled out of an annual Vatican celebration of Judaism, according to the U.K. Times. In a strongly worded article in an Italian Jesuit publication, the chief rabbi of Venice, Elia Enrico Richetti, cited a more robust Vatican insistence on the superiority of Christian faith and the restoration of prayers for the conversion of the Jews in the newly restored Latin liturgy as the cause of the boycott: "The interruption of cooperation between Italian Judaism and the Church is the logical consequence of the position of the Church as expressed by its highest authorities," he wrote.
It is terribly unfortunate that one of the greatest legacies of Pope John Paul II, his commitment to interreligious dialogue, especially with Judaism, is being diminished by the current Vatican regime. Pope Benedict has made some major missteps from the beginning of his pontificate on this matter, first by dissolving (though eventually restoring) the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, then with an infelicitous reference to Islam in a speech in Germany, and last year with an unnecessary defense of the World War II pope, Pius XII. (You can read my February 2009 The Examined Life column on that controversy here.)
Let us hope for a new, more positive overture from Rome.
God's franchise is exclusive?
By Joe Walker (not verified) on Tuesday, January 20, 2009The Hebrew and the Christian Scriptures seem to indicate that all humans were created by our Creator , and that all of the Creator's creations are very good. I'm puzzled as to why certain of the Creator's human creations believe that the Creator gave their institutional religions an exclusive franchise? Please pardon my naivete; I jam ust another rather ordinary pew warmer.
Greetings, Well, the
By Timothy (not verified) on Tuesday, January 20, 2009Greetings,
Well, the “franchise” idea comes from the same Scriptures that you write about, sir. Moreover, if you are Catholic, it comes from the Creed that you profess while you are not warming your pew. If you are not Catholic and would be saved, not to worry. It will be because of the Church that Christ established with his blood,the Catholic Church, that you could be saved.
Timothy+
God's franchisees
By Bryan Cones on Tuesday, January 20, 2009Actually, Timothy, I think using those same scriptures could be used to argue that the Jews have the original franchise. As Jesus says in John's gospel to the Samaritan woman, "Salvation is from the Jews. !!!
I think the church's official teaching on this matter is quite complex, especially as embodied in the teachings of Vatican II. Lumen gentium, the Dogmatic Constituion on the Church, includes those who do not even believe in God among those for whom salvation is possible. Nostra Aetate, the Declaration on the Relationship of the Church to Non-Christian Religions, affirms that God's covenant with the Jewish people endures--it has not been superceded by the covenant in Christ.
The dispute now in Catholic circles, at least to my mind, is whether all are saved through the work of the historical person, Jesus of Nazareth, and whether religions other than Judaism and Christianity can be understood as properly "revealed."
Bryan Cones
I agree
By Timothy (not verified) on Tuesday, January 20, 2009Greetings,
Well, yes. I agree. Salvation is certainly from the Jews. Our entire liturgy is dependent on that fact, not withstanding that the historical Jesus was in fact a Jew, in fulfillment of many, many prophecies.
God denies no one the grace to obtain salvation, and if salvation is wrought, it is so because of the altar that Christ, in the Flesh, established in the Holy Catholic Church, His Body, by his final sacrifice for all of us.
The beloved Cardinal Dulles wrote of this. Father Neuhaus maintained this, as well. Cardinal de Lubac, following a return to the Fathers, some of whom argued for the restoration of all things, was nonetheless purely Christocentric in his humanism, as was JPII and our current Holy Father.
I suppose I could go on. Even Chardin kept his speculation of the Omega Point within the parameters of the hypostatic union. So, no, other religions’ texts cannot be considered revealed as they would deny the One who is Revelation Himself, "I am the truth, etc., etc., etc." I cannot wrap my mind around any other possibility. What Christian scholars maintain that other religions’ texts, excluding the canon, are Divinely Revealed?
Thanks,
Timothy+
Backing
By Timothy (not verified) on Saturday, January 17, 2009Greetings,
More importantly, let us hope for a full-Bodied support of the papacy by Americans who are Catholics.
Timothy+


