The graveyard of empires
It is the quagmire-clock moving closer to midnight that worries me the most regarding our strategy in Afghanistan and Iraq. I find myself wondering sometimes if anyone in Washington still reads history books, or even Newsweek.
We seem determined to repeat the grossest of imperial errors, overstretching our resources and living beyond our means, madly determined to protect supply lines to an imperial capital that is already collapsing around us.
Here's a little wisdom related to our two-war strategy for subduing the Middle East, and one assumes preserving our oil trade routes, I picked up from Matin Meenagh, a UK historian:
<<Here is a list of all those major powers who have invaded Afghanistan at one time or another. I do not pretend that it is authoritatively exhaustive, but believe that it may be, and if you want to comment further I'd be happy to hear from you.
Alexander the Great
Arab Islam
Mahmud of Ghazni and the Ghaznavids
Genghis Khan
Tamerlaine
The Turks
The Moghuls
The British Empire
The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 1979-1989
NATO
Here is a list of those who managed to hold the place without any major massacres, corruption, devastation, or the ultimate collapse of their hold from exhaustion, bankruptcy or foreign invasion so far.
0.
Here is a list of those who ended up being accused of overstrech, brutality, the collapse of self confidence, and folie de grandeur (and that was those of the group not remembered by a species prone to psychosis as monsters).
All of them.
Young men and women (some of whom I know and all of whom I respect) are out there at the moment, and really, given that they are in the middle of a civil war that began after the deposition of Mohammad Daud Khan it is sensible to ask 'why?'.
Have a think about that question. Invading Afghanistan, however strategically important people think the act, has a tendency to lead to horror and exhaustion. It may be that the oil is slipping away, and that the security of the lines of trade and energy upon which we shall desperately spend ourselves in the coming years is worth it; I doubt it. It may be that the West will succeed in its aims. I'm not sure of that either. But what is obvious is that the Afghan War is not won, and whatever the strength of the weltvolksgemeinschaft it won't be>>
Comments (5)
I think the Iraq war was
By Anonymous (not verified) on Friday, July 31, 2009I think the Iraq war was considered a lost cause as well, but thats been turned around by coalition troops. I am going to deploy as a US MARINE in the spring of 2010.
Before you judge something, be sure to get the facts an oppinions from the ground guys. Times change, politics change, and people change. This war is a fight for hearts and minds, not with guns and ammo. There is good in everyone, and the bloodshed will end one way or another! Victory belongs to the one with the bigger stick, larger heart, and noblest cause.
Semper Fi.
Thankyou
By Martin Meenagh (not verified) on Tuesday, May 12, 2009Thanks for the endorsement, and I don't mind you quoting me at all. Sorry that it took me so long to turn up here--I don't google my name often!
Googling
By Kevin Clarke on Tuesday, May 12, 2009<<-I don't google my name often!>>
Martin,
You are a better man than me . . . I would google myself more often but it seems I most often land back here.
K
Re: PLAGIARISM Martin
By Joe (not verified) on Tuesday, November 25, 2008Re: PLAGIARISM
Martin Meenagh blog of Jan 2008 ... strangely, your very insightful commentary is found "word for word" in the Martin Meenagh blog. Should there not be a citation as behooves all authoritative literature. Remember poor Joe B in '88. (ha, ha: caught ya!!!... ah, the wonders of googling).
Plagiarism
By Kevin Clarke on Tuesday, November 25, 2008Dude:
Is close reading a dying art? Please see the paragraph immediately above my lengthy and clearly noted excerpt from MM's wonderful blog. Sheesh.
